he was so much different as a younger man than when he got older. In AOAM he looks much leaner, boyish and smooth. Ten years later he would gain about 50 pounds, added a few wrinkles, some gray hair and a more gruff voice.
I prefer the older George. He had more character and grew into his persona later in life.
I first saw George C. Scott in "Patton" as a fifteen-year-old and didn't take to him at all because of his gruffness and foul mouth.
I saw "Anatomy of a Murder" in my early 20s and was blown away by how different and charismatic Scott was as Claude Dancer. I hadn't imagined that Scott had it in him to be so urbane and self-possessed and speak so smoothly. Watching "Anatomy" got me started on a spree of Scott's movies, and I have been a fan ever since.
One of the best things about Scott's performance in "Anatomy" was how he managed to make his character so memorable despite the fact that the audience only sees Dancer in a professional capacity. Normally, actors need some scope for human moments to make a character stand out. Scott needed none.
The only other performance I can think of where an actor delivered such a charismatic performance when portraying a character in a strictly professional capacity is Tommy Lee-Jones in "The Fugitive". Like Scott in "Anatomy", he was nominated for the Best Supporting Actor Oscar, but unlike Scott, he actually won.
reply
share