MovieChat Forums > Murder by Contract (1958) Discussion > What did you rate ''Murder by Contract''...

What did you rate ''Murder by Contract'' (1958)?


Claude (Vince Edwards) is a young man with a regular job, no history of trouble with the law and no chance of making any real money. He also has the brains and emotional detachment to make the big bucks as a hit man, and that becomes his new job title. A string of successful hits gets him sent to Los Angeles for his latest job. There he is accompanied by two goons: one who is perpetually nervous and the other who quickly worships the young man as a hero. The cold, ruthless hit man finally becomes unglued when he finds out that his latest target is a woman. She's a witness, set to testify against his boss, and guarded day and night by the police. It's her femininity that worries Claude: women are unpredictable, they don't do what you expect. Claude eventually proves that he is the unpredictable one and his own worst enemy.

This quirky crime film has the usual symptoms of a low budget and a tight shooting schedule: some poorly written scenes, poorly acted scenes and plot holes. But much of it works very well, especially the opening sequences depicting Claude's unusual job interview and his initial series of hits. I especially liked how the barber shop murder was handled. Vince Edwards is good in the lead, though he's better when he's not forced to mouth pretentious monologues that lay on the irony a bit too thick. (At one point I was reminded of Charlie Chaplin's fatuous comments about murderers versus soldiers in "Monsieur Verdoux.") The spare electric guitar score is effective. It's worth watching, especially since Martin Scorsese has acknowledged it as an influence on his films, notably "Taxi Driver."

imdb.com/title/tt0051959/ratings

I rated this film 6/10 for the database. What did you rate it? What do you think of it?


...Justin

reply

5/10, only because I found some of the lines in the film to be inane. With better lines, it could have been a 8/10.




We're not fighting! We're in complete agreement! We hate each other!

reply

not even the lines will save it. what kind of logic does this film operate under? so many lengthy departures into fantasy land it annoys me that martin scorcese would give this film any plaudits. it's like escher or dali praising a fridge drawing.

reply


Saw it today. I did not like it much. The main story (hit men, contracts) had been done before and in a much better way, specially in Raoul Walsh's The Enforcer. The players looked and acted like other, more famous actors (the blonde maid was a strange combination of Bette Davis and Judy Holliday). The lead actor was ok, but his meditative monologues grow more and more tiresome as the film goes. It has been appraised for his "sparse" style but I see it more as a lack of financial means. Many scenes include the three killers chatting around in the same room, the same car...and nothing going on. The attempts to kill the girl are a bit ridiculous: why do it with so many complications, if "a stranger killing a stranger" is never suspected ? The ending is a bit of a mess. After so many lines to etablish the main character as complex and mysterious, it just shuts up and we're left not knowing what has happened in his brain...and what we can guess is not particuarly interesting.


" You ain't running this place, Bert, WILLIAMS is!" Sgt Harris

reply