50's Realism
I love the way the wife is in full make up and high heels at 7 in the morning! Even in 1958 I doubt if many of them bothered.
shareI love the way the wife is in full make up and high heels at 7 in the morning! Even in 1958 I doubt if many of them bothered.
shareI just watched this on Film 4 and one thing that looked so phoney is that the view out of Gideon's office window is a cardboard bridge over the River Thames complete with a flat cardboard bus and a flat cardboard lorry being pulled across the bridge on a piece of string. When they get to the end of the bridge, they are pulled back again, hopefully to give the impression of traffic moving across the bridge, but failing miserably to do so. Obviously, the budget didn't run to a bit of back projection of a real bridge and real traffic. And John Ford was supposedly revered as a great director? Not on the strength of this, he wasn't.
sharejust watched it and liked that copper giving a parking ticket to the inspector ..and then later to the judge LOL
Yes, it's quite funny really. One of the bits of 'special effect' that makes me cringe is the water bursting upwards in 'The Dambusters'. But I guess they had to work with what they had. And I guess John Ford didn't have much of a budget for this film.
shareYes, the bursting dam in "The Dam Busters" was very poorly done, compared with the rest of the film, which was excellent. It's not just that it looks bad now, nearly 60 years later, because I went to see it as a boy in the 1950s and I thought the bursting dam effect was bad even then. It seemed to be a shot of some river rapids filmed from above, then superimposed on the model sky background over the dam. If I had been a special effects technician on the film, I would have told the director that the only way we could make it look real was to blow up a real dam somewhere, or, failing that, don't show the bursting dam at all and have it all happen off screen. Conversely, whoever it was that worked on the special effects for Rank's "Campbell's Kingdom" only three years later, did a superb job of making the bursting dam in that film look very impressive and real.
shareI liked the technicolour aspect, a very colourful London.
Its that man again!!
Yes you can also see that in '23 Paces to Baker Street' and 'Lost'
shareI know 23 Paces to Baker Street,but what LOST do you refer to?
shareThis one:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0048315/?ref_=nm_flmg_act_71
Also called Tears for Simon (for the US probably). It's a brilliant hardly ever seen film with shots of Kensington and the south coast.
thanks so much for the reply.
A couple of years after your comment I did not really expect a reply.
I have seen loads of old British films but I am not sure I have ever seen this one.
I will look out for it on tv or dvd.
I found a copy on ebay
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Lost-1956-David-Farrar-Julia-Arnall-David-Knight-Thora-Hird-DVD-/111873965367?hash=item1a0c353d37:m:mPOJUnXY6ID1GudK5J3xphg
I have a feeling it's probably copied off TV so quality might not be wonderful, but as far as I know this is not available on commercial DVD. I know my DVD is copied off the telly!
I found a copy on ebay
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Lost-1956-David-Farrar-Julia-Arnall-David-Knight-Thora-Hird-DVD-/111873965367?hash=item1a0c353d37:m:mPOJUnXY6ID1GudK5J3xphg
I have a feeling it's probably copied off TV so quality might not be wonderful, but as far as I know this is not available on commercial DVD. I know my DVD is copied off the telly!
I just love this film. It's a bit of a mystery why John Ford found himself in London doing this! Everything about the film is wonderful, the clothes, the old cars, (some of which I can recognise!) and the hilarious lack of traffic in London! Jack Hawkins played a very similar character two years earlier, in the 1956 film 'The Long Arm,' but because it was shot in black and white, it's sadly faded into relative obscurity, despite being every bit as good. It's the fact this movie was shot in colour that makes it so memorable. Yes, it's dated, yes, it's a bit twee.. but I love it!
shareOne scene did seem unrealistic, even for 1950's police procedure. It transpires that nobody had thought to check the corrupt cop's locker. The man was under investigation and suspended and the place most likely to contain evidence, also being Scotland Yard's own property, has not been opened at the earliest opportunity?
shareYes it was definitely a silly slip-up. And another thing that struck me as odd is that one of the detectives clearly sound like an American. That'd be highly unlikely now, never mind in the 1950's! I've looked at the cast list and can't place him, a very minor role, but will watch it again to see if I can pick up who it is!
shareIt was John Loder who is NOT American! So why he sounded it I have no idea.