Hi, MrPie7...if I may refer back a couple of posts to your Hugh Marlowe inquiry.
I also wondered why he didn't maintain a stronger career than he'd started out with. He made a couple of stabs at Hollywood in the late 30s and again the mid-40s but mainly concentrated on stage and particularly radio. He finally settled in films in 1949 when he made Twelve O'Clock High and several other distinguished films at 20th Century Fox, to which he was under contract for five years. (All About Eve, The Day the Earth Stood Still, and a number of other quality films.) But he was seldom a leading man and while I always liked him his range was a bit limited. I think he always did better on those rare occasions when he was the star, and not in support of major leading men. Even so, I'm surprised his movie career declined so precipitously. By the 60s, he was alternating between abysmal films in which he wasn't even the lead (Thirteen Frightened Girls, Castle of Evil, etc.) and very small parts in top films (Elmer Gantry, Birdman of Alcatraz, Seven Days in May). Maybe he was a friend of Burt Lancaster, the lead in all three of those films.
He made his last movie (in the lead) in England in 1969, a weak but okay mystery called The Last Shot You Hear, then took the nominal leading role in the daytime TV soap opera Another World, in which he starred until his sudden death of a heart attack in 1982. I am good friends with the man who originated and wrote Another World for its first 20 years or more, and he liked Hugh Marlowe, but even he said to me once, "He's really not a very good actor." I thought he was a competent, serviceable actor who could be quite good under the best circumstances but even otherwise was certainly convincing and solid, and he certainly didn't quite have the career he deserved...although he did manage to make a lifelong living at it, something a lot of actors don't manage.
As to World Without End, I'm with my friend gary -- I think it's a great, fun film, one of my very favorites. Obviously it's not on a par with The Best Years of Our lives (in my opinion, the finest American film ever made), but then it's not supposed to be. For what it was, and what it tried to do, and with its budget and the cinematic limitations of 1956, I think it was very good indeed. Well-written and -acted, and generally very well made.
Oh, the name of the other sci-fi film Hugh M. made that year was Earth Vs. the Flying Saucers, with effects by Ray Harryhausen. Definitely NOT Invasion of the Saucermen, which was indeed laughably awful! Marlowe was exceptionally good in the above-average EVTFS too -- proof of what he was capable of.
reply
share