James Dean's Performance +/-


I'm a very big James Dean fan. He's inspired me in ways no other actor has, and i believe He's just a rare breed of character. But one thing i don't get is the praise over his performance in Rebel Without a Cause. I love the movie, i really do, its interesting and speaks on more levels than whats apparent. But i find JD's performance lacking, mostly compared to his other two performances (East of Eden, Giant). Perhaps i'm not looking at it right, but i've seen the movie several times, the last time just a few days ago. I'm open to discussion, and i truly want to understand his performance, and the praise for it. Why was it such an important performance/etc? Please answe! lol

reply



I'd agree with alot of that post, he was an incredible charactor, an incredibly cool persona but I didn't get what was so great about this performance. Alot of this film, I thought, was down to good script writing. In fact one scene I didn't like was when he burst out laughing after his father dropped the mothers dishes. It just seemed weird or something, I didn't think it felt realistic. But like the OP I'm totally open to "sensible" discussion because I too would like to understand why this performance is so highly praised.

reply

[deleted]



I can understand the rawness etc, but surely the showing families aren't happy 24/7 was more to do with the writer than the actors?

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

I think he was really good in "Eden", almost as good as he was in this one. But I didn't care for him that much in "Giant." He really had it going in the early parts but he went too far at the end. I think his acting in "Rebel" is really sensitive, he manages to make the other actors look better than they would with other co-stars.

Did I not love him, Cooch? MY OWN FLESH I DIDN'T LOVE BETTER!!! But he had to say 'Nooooooooo'

reply

I like James Dean's acting in East of Eden,sometimes his face was heart breaking...

reply

[deleted]

James Dean is a shameless Brando impersonator...unfortunately. If you've seen A Streetcar Named Desire (1951) and know it by heart you'll never look at James Dean the same because it is so painfully obvious he's trying to imitate Marlon Brando! I have nothing against Dean, he was ok I guess...but he's much more of a symbol than an actor. Maybe if he hadn't died so young he would have developed a style of his own (wearing jeans and squinting is NOT a style!) but as it is now I just can't help but cringe at his obvious Brando mannerisms.

Brando even said in his biography (Songs That Mother Taught Me) that Dean was infatuated with him and that he was acting real tough and being a total dick in real life that Brando at one point had to physically and verbally shake him out of it. I believe it took place at some Hollywood party where Dean made a fool of himself by being all "method". Still, Brando says he has fond memories of Dean... but this little story stuck in my head because I've always thought Dean was something of a phony. Not a bad actor, just an actor who havn't really found himself at that point.

reply

I think it's depressing that someone would call Dean a phony and merely a Brando impersonator. He is PERCEIVED today, wrongly, as more of a symbol. He WAS much more of an actor. His legend is also grossly misunderstood, and I feel that it is his misunderstood persona that people relate so much to Brando.

I know the story from Brando's book. Jim wasn't being all "method." To tell it more accurately, Dean went in with an attitude and threw his jacket down on the floor instead of hanging it up. Marlon told him to hang his coat up, that he didn't have to do things like that to impress people. He told him to just act like a normal person, life is much easier that way.

Dean in real life did like to imitate Marlon's character in The Wild One because he was moved by that film. However, Dean's performances on film are honest portrayals and revelations of his true self: He was a lost child. This is what I see in all three of the characters he portrayed on screen, and I feel like this is where his legend gets confused because people think of him as this tough guy, macho rebel. Anyone who pays stiff attention to his on screen performances will know who Dean's characters really were. Marlon's style in his earlier characters were so much more masculine and in-your-face than what Dean was doing. Jim DID have a style, and it was different than Brando's. Their techniques might have been similar because they were both method actors to an extent. In my eye, Dean was expressing something different on a personal level than what Brando was at the time.

Regarding Dean's performance in Rebel, it is my least favorite. It's overacted as are the performances of Wood and Mineo. I blame this on the director. I've read somewhere that he had them overact to an extent on purpose, but I can't exactly remember why he wanted these theatrical performances. I think it's really unfortunate because as effective and relevant as the themes are in this movie, as well as the dialogue, I find that the performances make the movie feel slightly dated.

Anyway, in my opinion Jim was the most talented actor of his time after Brando. His performance in Giant is his best, I think. It is amazing how he makes the transition from young, lovable, and troubled to old, arrogant, and broken. I feel like had Jim lived on, he might have even become more influential than Brando. I really resent Brando's attitude about acting and movies later on in his career. He cared more about politics and said acting was a "bum's" job. He walked through roles. Who knows what Dean could have done.

reply

*Small East of Eden spoilers*
It's been a long time since I last saw Giant, so I can't really comment on that, but I prefer his Rebel performance to East of Eden. I think he was much more understated and subtle in Rebel. I think some people view it as his weakest role because he doesn't have dramatic monologues or hysterical crying scenes (like the party scene in Eden) etc. There's no definitive moment where you go "Wow! That was great acting!", which I think happened a few times in East of Eden. I think he did really well at different areas of drama. In Eden, I think he did really well in his darker moments, such as when he reads the Bible and insists on saying the numbers to irritate his father, "Say hello to your mother, Aron" etc.

reply

I thought James did a great job in this film. You can see the genuine pain that he had inside of him. I think he wanted to be loved. What I will say for the Brando thing is yes he was a fan, but I don't think James imitated THAT much like people are saying.

reply

he had a quality of "unedited" about him. brando had the same quality, this made their characters look so real to the point you forget they are acting, and that in my opinion is what separates them from so many other good actors out there.

plus for james dean he had this little lost boy look about him, that made female fans fall in love with him, women say they feel like they need to mother and take care of him. which in turn makes them care about his character and take a journey with him.

he had this quality most in East of eden. i think the reason rebel without a cause is not his best is because he saw "rebel" in the title and instead of being himself, he somehow ended up playing an idea of what a rebel "should be" and not really what his character was feeling and going through at the time. still a good performance but not as good as Giant.

reply

I need to rewatch his other two films, but I liked Dean in Rebel Without a Cause. Sure, it's overcooked at times (then again, teens tend to be melodramatic by nature, which might have been why those decisions were made), but overall, the performance is sensitive and touching. Having watched a lot of older movies, I can tell you Dean's performance feels so different from how teenagers tended to be portrayed before that point. He feels more real and he evokes adolescent frustrations with brilliance.

Also don't get the "he's a Brando rip-off" accusations? Brando was a big deal-- why wouldn't a young actor working in the 1950s be influenced by him? That influence does not make someone a thief.

reply