MovieChat Forums > Rebel Without a Cause (1955) Discussion > Rebel Without A Cause or The Breakfast C...

Rebel Without A Cause or The Breakfast Club


Your pick

Me: Rebel Without a Cause

Reason: James Dean

I wake up from dreams and go "Wow, put this down on paper."

reply

Rebel Without a Cause, definitely.

reply

Breakfast Club.

There's actually good acting in it, and a decent story.

Rebel Without a Casue had neither. It simply had a legend for the lead role, and even still, his acting was shocking.

reply

James Dean's acting was shocking? How? And by what standards?

reply

Because he was classified as "a legend" in 1955 when he had only done TV shows for 4 years. Why don't you try again.

I'm going to open a cross dressing store and name it "Susan B. Anthony"

reply

And that qualifies his acting as being shocking?

reply

Hard question! Both portray teens in a certain decade, but still deal with rebellion and social stereotypes.

My pick...

The Breakfast Club

Why...

John Hughes.

But what a hard choice!!!


Love and Other Drugs
The Romantics
Somewhere
Black Swan
Never Let Go
127 Hours

reply

Rebel Without A Cause

reply

Rebel Without a Cause
Reasons:
1 - I love old movies.
2 - IMO, better acting
3 - More relatable (at least for me)
4 - James Dean had some inexplicable magnetism and charisma that made it hard to take your eyes off him, or not empathise with him.
5 - I'm a huge Natalie Wood fan :)
6 - I find it to be the superior movie. Never understood the appeal of Breakfast Club.

reply

Rebel Without a Breakfast Club.

reply

Rebel Without A Cause most definitely. It was more realistic and easier to relate.

http://twitter.com/#!/hippiegoddess54
http://cmtothemc94.tumblr.com/

reply

Great topic because each one attempted to speak for a generation, or rather, each generation kind of adopted it as their own reflection. My guess is that not every teen in the 50's got into knife fights and played chicken with cars driving off cliffs - but the conversations with Mineo, Wood and Dean alone were just as relevant as anything John Hughes ever wrote.

The biggest difference between Rebel and Breakfast is that with Breakfast Club, you had a whole movie where teenagers talked about their problems - you could only guess at what their lives were like outside of detention, but that was also a big part of its allure. Rebel showed everything - there was nothing left to chance, with a few scenes where people talked about their feelings, etc. I think the diversity of the character types in Breakfast Club makes it more relatable to more teenagers, but the themes in both movies are the same as any teen psyche would have.

I don't know - I think Rebel was a more complete movie but Breakfast Club was better for taking one element and running with it for an entire movie. Actually the two movies compliment each other very well.

reply

[deleted]

Rebel without a Cause. I took those characters seriously.


The Breakfast Club was a kiddie show, whiny little characters with trivial problems, who were just annoying.






"Joey, have you ever been in a Turkish prison?"

reply

Rebel without a Cause. Teen angst without all the riff-raff of the 80s.

reply

"Rebel Without a Cause," without it, there would be no "Breakfast Club"

"Forget reality, give me a picture"-Remington Steele

reply