its not too easy to see how exactly these guys are "Rebels." half the hell that was raised wasnt even raised by Johnny, and he's the head honcho of the gang. the most trouble he's caused is revving his bike too loudly and just stealing that trophy. nothing more.
someone gonna bash me? cuz i know i must be stupid if i can't appreciate this film for what it is.
My point in regarding them as rebels was their attitude towards the "bourgeois", righteous way of life that was considered normal these days. They don't give a s*it about having an ordinary work and finding their appropriate place in society. They represent a new species of youth who doesn't just develop they way they were intended to and that was deemed right by social guidelines. Riding motorbikes, drinking and not minding about tomorrow depicted rebelhood. You have to watch the movie with its historic background in mind.
The petty crimes they committed were only a consequence of them being rebels and not what eventually made them rebels.
No need to bash anybody! Nobody is going to tell you that you must like the film because it's considered a classic.
Yes, they were "rebels". But one thing to realize is that back then society wasn't as litigious & paranoid as it is now. In other words, raising hell and driving around in circles wasn't really a crime. (Try it today, though, and you'll probably get 20 years for "terrorism".)
In that context, we see that this film is not a clearcut case of "good vs. bad", but rather it's "fear vs. fear" on both sides. Johnny gets caught in the middle, persecuted because he happens to dress a certain way and associate with certain people. But--aside from accepting stolen goods (the trophy)--he doesn't break any laws.
If a huge gang of bikers came driving around my house and started drinking heavily and doing all that stuff...I think I would be pretty upset and scared as well...
Their sense of rebellion was not in riding their noisy bikes, their leather jackets or even their drunkenness, but in their continuous sense of humor. The austere townspeople never show a sense of humor at all, personifying the the prevailing mood of the Eisenhower era.
I remember the Eisenhower era. There was a lot of humor, and for the most part it wasn't as restricted, censored, frowned upon as humor has become today.
it´s the 50´s era. And the world was divded into black and white. No other chance. If you wore a leather jacket and jeans in civil places you were a "rebel". Oh, as for the movie... it´s just another concotion for young people in the audience. abel posadas
You have to watch the movie with its historic background in mind.
Totally true. Remember as well, that this was a time in America right after WWII, where prosperity was at an all time high, jobs were plentiful, the baby boom was in full swing and the country was in a state of jubilation and at peace. Yet, not everyone was happy with that staid style of life. A lot of guys returning from war had seen and done things on and off the battlefield that didn't jive with settling down. They wanted to get out, have fun, burn off the adrenaline, etc.
Then you had a group of younger guys coming up that didn't make it overseas, but still had that desire to be "grown up" and to "prove they were men" and the motorcycle clubs presented an opportunity.
The film itself did the right thing (IMO) in staying closely to the truth of the actual events in Hollister in 1947. While the crowds were large, the "violence" was more of a petty variety (compared with today)drinking, fighting, racing, brodie's, property damage and yes, as someone else posted, the citizens of the town were scared and panicked.
As for Johnny, he was the symbol of what the town was truly afraid of, a danger they could sense, but didn't know how to fight. The petty violence, drinking (they profited from that, even), insolence, fighting, etc. was something they could handle. Knew it would ride off in the same cloud of dust which had blown it in. But, Johnny? It was his potential to DO something really bad, that had everyone on edge.
How do you fight something you can sense, but doesn't quite happen? With a word, he could have set off the whole group. With a word, the town's figurehead "good girl" would have run off with him. He even had the town's top cop, her pop, on his side. He evidenced a dangerous charm for which they were unprepared.
reply share
I found this film really hard to watch (for various reasons, including some of the campier moments and bad dialogue), especially the intimidation/vandalism scenes - I can't believe more people don't find it disturbing but am glad to see I'm not the only one.