Why did the Mexican Goverment not Like It?

He was aided by the Catholic church to get out of the misery. Made him a civilized person. Taught him to eat in the table, with spoons and forks. To dress in a proper manner. Juárez's payback was with ingratitude and treason to that church which had taken him out of the misery. Years later he became rich by selling church's properties. To this day,150 years later, his descendants still live happily because of the product of all that stealing. He came to power not much because of his capacities, but because of his appereance. Facing a crisis, they chose him because of his underdog image. His contemporaries define him as "a closed person" "of mediocre intelligence" and "not a very good speaker/orator". "He barely spoke or laugh". When he became the governor of Oaxaca he was a good parishioner, he urged his workers to pay tithe, confess , and commune to ask for divine help. This demonstrates his dual personality, his acommodative trailing character, always subordinate to the dominant forces of each moment. Contrary to what many think, Juárez didn't make the reform. He came to power after the Reform War, when everything had already been made by others. In reality, these laws were given to the then also Francmason Valentín Gómez Farías by the United States in 1835. Also, Juárez did not defeat the French either. They left because the United States(which supported Juárez)had already ended their civil war and could now confront the French army. This is the truth, Juárez's liberals never could defeat the French. The battle of fifth of may was just an inconsequential skirmish, the French remained invincible.

"Juárez the democrat" is another lie. In the presidential elections of 1871, Benito Juárez, Sebastián Lerdo De Tejada, and Porfirio Díaz presented themselves as candidates, resulting in Juárez as being the apparent winner, although with evident electoral frauds. So he never was the constitutional president, nor was he chosen by the people. In response, Porfirio Díaz raise up in arms with the Noria Plan to remove Juárez from power but he failed.

Juárez posed himself as president for 15 years without any respect of the existing laws. Because of this, Juárez was a dictator. Also, he killed many people. He got rid of his political enemies outside any constitutional order and murdered with impunity.

In 5 years, from 1867 to 1872, he shed more blood than the general Porfirio Díaz in 30 years. To his enemies, his phrase "respect the rights of others is peace" was never true.

Juárez, the "example of his indigenous race".

Juárez never showed to be proud of his indigenous origin. On the contrary, apparently he seemed ashamed of it. He himself married a Creole woman. And he married all of his offspring with people of caucasian origin. In an effort to get farther and farther away from his indigenous origin.

He never did anything for the indigenous people.

Juárez, "the great patriot".
The above defines him as a not very trustworthy man, ungrateful, accommodative, racist, a thief, a murderer, with an inferiority complex...But this is nothing compared to his worst aspect.....
A traitor to the fatherland.

Juárez was a Francmason, member of those American lodges, whose ultimate end was to take United States' hegemony over the world.

Ever since Juárez was the governor of Oaxaca he showed his submission or admiration for the americans. In 1847, while all of the country was fighting against them deffending the Mexican sovereignty, Juárez didn't do anything, he didn't say a word against the americans, he didn't send any soldiers to support the national defense against the worst invasion México has ever suffered which ultimately cost it to lose half its territory.

All of the Mexican Francmasons, or Hispanoamericans, where puppets either consciously or unconsciously of the United States. From Hidalgo, Bolívar, or even the liberals or Juárez himself.

All of the Masons served the american objective. First, to destroy the enormous Spanish empire by independizing its colonies. Second, to increase the United States territory at the expense of México, stealing as much territory as possible.

Juárez got tired of selling the territory to the United States with the pretext that they would recognize him as president.
He signed treaties with the United States so they could have access from the Mazatlan (steps?, only translation I could come up with) to Matamoros, Nogales to Guaymas, and all the Tehuantepec isthmus(from Tabasco to Chiapas) giving those roads to the sovereignty of the americans with permission to kill, arrest and possess lands, in the disastrous MAC LANE-OCAMPO TREATY.

If you still don't believe me, I'll show you a part of that shameful treaty, and you can verify it in any library or the internet.


Mac Lane-Ocampo treaty, an authentic jewel of the treason to the fatherland in all the history of any place.

"Treaty of transit and commerce between México and the United States underwritten by Robert Mac Lane, minister of the United States in México, and Melchor Ocampos, minister of foreign affairs of México, in Veracruz, december 14 of 1859"

Art 1.:

"To deliver the Mexican Republic to the United States and its citizens and property, in perpetuity, the right of transit across the Isthmus of Tehuantepec sea to sea, by any route that currently exists or hereafter exists"

Art. 5:
"In the exceptional case of unforeseen or imminent danger to the life or property of citizens of the United States, authorized are the forces of said republic to work in the protection of those within the Mexican territory without having obtained prior consent"

Art 7:
"The Mexican Republic grants to the United States the simple transit of its troops, military stores and munitions of war by the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, and by the transit or route of communication referred to in this Convention from the city of Guaymas, on the Gulf of California, to the Rancho de Nogales, or some suitable point on the boundary line between the Republic of Mexico and the United States"

Juárez also asked money to the United States government in support of the reforma laws, build concentration camps with the purpose of interning servicemen, ecclesiasticals and conservatives.

Fortunately for México, this shameful treaty was not carried out, thanks to the United States senate, which rejected it.....BECAUSE THEY WANTED THE COMPLETE SLICE...
For which they made a counter proposal, of the definitive purchase of Sonora, Baja California and Chihuahua for 15 million pesos.

When this proposal arrived to México, Juárez was not in power anymore, but his conservative enemies were. Who were MORE PATRIOTIC and downright rejected it.

Juárez, at that time was hiding in San Juan de Ulúa where he made another even more abject proposal. He sent Lerdo de Tejada as a liberal representative to the ambassador of the United States, telling him about the desire of Juárez to:
INVADE MÉXICO, IMPOSE ENGLISH AS THE OFFICIAL LANGUAGE AND BAN THE CATHOLIC RELIGION. AND THE "AMERICANIZATION" WITH MASSIVE IMMIGRATION OF AMERICANS, AND TO IMPORT OFFICIALS TO TEACH THE MEXICAN ARMY MILITARY DISCIPLINE.

All this treason and abjection of Juárez that proposed the destruction of the Mexican Nation, was not mentioned during its era. All the liberal governments that followed him did the opposite. They tried to exalt him as "the great patriot" (the masons from South América just played along with the charade) and hemicycles and statues of marble were made out of him. Many roads, streets and sub-divisions were named after him, glorifying the worst traitor in Mexican history.

All of this was the cause of the Mexican Revolution.

PRI(a political party)heir of the "liberal" period of Juárez, would continue with its glorification of the traitor Benito Juárez through SEP. Through the 70-year dictatorship of this party, they would put into the heads of the millions of kids the myth of Juárez.

Down to the manufacture of false idols
Down with demagoguery

¡Viva México!

I have lived in Mexico and I live now in Los Angeles but I never heard any Mexican with your point of view. Benito Juarez is considered in Mexico one of the greatest heros of its independence as it is written in all Mexican history books. That said, you have the right to your own opinion. However, this blog has nothing to do with the subject of Juarez or if he was good or bad. Please take your outlandish opinions to some historical blog.