Why Robert Cummings?


If you're a Robert Cummings fan, don't bother reading this.

I thought he was horrible, unable to convey anything other than dorkiness. He seemed like an amateur among professionals. While I don't think Grace Kelly is a great actress, she certainly had screen presence. Even Anthony Dawson as Swann was better. Ray Milland, of course, stole the show. When Cummings whispers "What's he doing?" it sounds like something from a 60s Disney movie or "Leave it to Beaver."

From his first moment on screen, looking smugly left and right as he arrives in England, he is distractingly annoying. There are several moments in this film when his face should display some type of emotion, but his is blank, like Howdy Doody. In his first scene with Grace Kelly, he is very unconvincing in the manner he holds his glass and cigarette.

Phony smoking is a pet peeve of mine. Like fake Southern accents, I hate watching non-smokers pretend to smoke. Watch Bogart. He smokes naturally. (That may be a bad example, because everything he does looks natural.) The cigarette is an extension of a smoker's hand. In non-smokers' hands, it's a foreign object, a prop, something that seems to be their primary, conscious focus. Why was he smoking anyway? There was no need for this character to smoke.

While I can understand a non-smoker being an unconvincing smoker, there's no excuse for someone not to be able to look natural holding a drinking glass! Everyone holds a drinking glass or cup at some point in their lives. And they drink out of them. In Dial M for Murder, between the glass and cigarette, Cummings looks like he's holding two live animals in his hands that he doesn't know what to do with.

Finally, why Robert Cummings anyway? THIS is who GRACE KELLY'S character would have an affair with? Why this dweeb? She could get anybody. Was it Hitchcock's way of not having "competition" for his leading lady? Robert Cummings seems much more suited for bland sitcom dads or a game show host, not someone Grace Kelly(!) is having a torrid affair with.

I still enjoy this movie, and by no means is Cummings the worst ever, but he does make me cringe at times.

reply

Well, yeah... Unfortunately you're right on all accounts. It's strange how this Cummings guy became a Hollywood leading man, considering that he don't have the acting chops nor any recognizeable charisma. Even Keanu bloody Reeves is less wooden and awkward than this doofus.




"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan

reply

Robert Cummings never achieved major leading man status. After this film he starred mostly in TV shows. He was cast mostly as an amiable, likeable lady's man.
Here he serves as the dweeb versus the conniving jerk of a husband. Poor Margo is caught between a rock and a hard place! Maybe Hitchcock's quiet commentary on that era, pre-women's liberation, when women were trapped in the social order of the time.
RSGRE

reply

In his address to the 1988 Republican National Convention, Ronald Reagan introduced a section of his speech with the words:

"Before we came to Washington, Americans had just suffered the two worst back-to-back years of inflation in 60 years. Those are the facts, and as John Adams said, ‘Facts are stubborn things.’"

This paragraph, and the following four paragraphs, finished with Adams’s words. However, at the end of the third paragraph, Reagan made a verbal slip, which he immediately corrected. A transcript of the speech reads,

"Facts are stupid things – stubborn things, should I say. [Laughter]."

However, despite its origin as a slip of the tongue, "Facts are stupid things" has taken on a life of its own in the world of quotations by those ignorant of... the facts.

"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence."

-- John Adams

reply

^ I don't quite see the point of the Reagan anecdote?

Pauline Kael unkindly referred to Cummings as "unengaging" in Saboteur and "unattractively untalented" in Dial M For Murder, and wondered why Hitchcock persisted in using him.

http://www.geocities.ws/paulinekaelreviews/index.html

Hitchcock obviously thought highly enough of him to use him twice, although they never worked together again after this film.

reply

The Reagan anecdote was in response to Franzkabuki quoting Reagan out of context.

reply

Is that a ... fact? LOL.

reply

bart-229 you're right about the Reagan quote, and I've presented the evidence on these threads just like you have here. But people like this guy are too dim to get it and they keep repeating the myth.

reply

[deleted]

I liked him, He reminded me of "Duck Phillips" from "Mad Men". He's got that old timey look to him.

reply

I can only imagine that that he was meant to be a background character that no one really cared about. The main focus of the movie was the murder and whether the husband would get away with it. I was held in suspense the entire time.

reply

[deleted]

Hitchcock wanted you to be "attracted" to his villain. This was a recurring occurrence in his films. Cummings WAS a leading man for awhile in Hollywood . he was the star of KING'S ROW, THE LOST MOMENT etc, etc. He was also Hitchcock's leading man in 1942's SABOTEUR, where he was quite good. However all criticisms of him in DIAL M are spot on. He is so annoying he becomes laugh-out-loud funny (esp. in the bit where he tries to pull the bank statements from the Inspector's grip). You think, Grace Kelly is cheating on suave Ray Milland with this guy?! Me thinks Hitchcock is largely responsible for this and we are reacting to this character exactly the way Hitchcock wants us to.

reply

Maybe thats why Ray Millands character decides to have her killed. He's probably thinking "She's cheating on me with THIS guy?"

reply

Hat-tip!

reply

Robert Cummings' performance is what keeps "Dial M for Murder" OFF my top 10 list of Hitchcock films. He's simply terrible.


1.Shadow of a Doubt
2.Strangers on a Train
3.Rear Window
4.Vertigo
5.North by Northwest
6.Psycho
7.To Catch a Thief
8.The Birds
9.Notorious
10.Rebecca

~Come to my room in a half hour and bring some rye bread~

reply

Maybe it's because I'm a woman, but I love Robert Cummings. He played more of an ordinary guy. He also didn't have any great dialogue like Milland did, so he had to make do with what he had

reply

[deleted]

Wow! No To Catch A Thief? 39 Steps?

Love Shadow Of A Doubt at #1 though.

reply

I could remove The Lady Vanishes and replace it with To Catch A Thief, that seems reasonable. In fact I think I'll edit my post. I'm not a huge fan of 39 Steps so that stays off the list. Thanks for the thumbs up on Shadow of a Doubt.

~Come to my room in a half hour and bring some rye bread~

reply

Who would have been a better actor for the part?

reply

I would liked to see Farley Grainger in the Bob Cummings roll.

~Come to my room in a half hour and bring some rye bread~
Bango (Jimmy Durante) to Miss Preen (Mary Wickes) in The Man Who Came to Dinner 1942.

reply

Yes to the nth degree. I don't like this movie anyway. So patly done and clumsily overplotted. But Cummings is the worst thing in it by a mile. For example (and this is especially apparent in "Dial M for Murder"), he never has a clue how to react credibly when other characters are speaking. Just sticks out like a sore thumb with those amateurish facial expressions of his. The man had a mild facility for light comedy, which he managed to exploit to some degree on his long-running 50's sitcom. But in anything close to drama, Cummings was hopeless. Smug as hell. With that smirk you yearned to wipe off his face. He ruined "Kings Row" singlehandedly. If only the makers had been able to get their first choice, Tyrone Power. Cummings was always laughable (in a bad way) in period films. Just couldn't shake that 20th century vibe. Check out the French revolutionary adventure "The Black Book" aka Reign of Terror. His idea of portraying sophistication was to over enunciate everything and look condescending. And the guy was in some terrific films but almost never emerged as any kind of asset. Was on sufficiently good behavior in excellent pieces like "Saboteur"and "The Chase" that he didn't do serious damage. Probably his best work is in the wonderful comedy "The Devil and Miss Jones". And - even in that - he's just okay, but luckily he's surrounded by a large and inspired cast led by Jean Arthur and Charles Coburn. "The Accused" from '48 is an otherwise terrific noir but I wince every time I remember that - in it - Loretta Young falls for him and not Wendell Corey.
And in "Dial M" we're to believe that another world class beauty, Grace Kelly, is panting over him. He must have been doing something right though - the man enjoyed decades of fame and I assume had fans. But that's a fan club I've never been tempted to join.

reply

I thought he was horrible, unable to convey anything other than dorkiness. He seemed like an amateur among professionals. While I don't think Grace Kelly is a great actress, she certainly had screen presence. Even Anthony Dawson as Swann was better. Ray Milland, of course, stole the show. When Cummings whispers "What's he doing?" it sounds like something from a 60s Disney movie or "Leave it to Beaver."

From his first moment on screen, looking smugly left and right as he arrives in England, he is distractingly annoying. There are several moments in this film when his face should display some type of emotion, but his is blank, like Howdy Doody. In his first scene with Grace Kelly, he is very unconvincing in the manner he holds his glass and cigarette.

Phony smoking is a pet peeve of mine.

---

Alfred Hitchcock got to work with a lot of major stars in his time -- on the male side, principally Cary Grant and James Stewart, but also Gregory Peck, Monty Clift, Henry Fonda, Laurence Oliver, and, late in the game, Sean Connery and Paul Newman.

But he rather crippled many of his films by working with BAD or mediocre actors. And with Robert Cummings, he did it twice.

Cummings in Dial M for Murder was bad enough -- but the villain really had the lead in this one(Ray Milland, mighty fine -- so polite, so cruel, so evil -- in a role first sought by CARY GRANT! Negotiations fell apart and Grant never got to play this horrible man.)

Meanwhile, Hitchcock was pretty much forced to give Robert Cummings the LEAD in Saboteur(1942), which forever renders that quite good WWII action movie into a ...B movie. Gary Cooper and Henry Fonda turned Saboteur down, Cary Grant was evidently not even asked(not All-American enough)...Hitchcock threw in the towel and went with a second tier star(the pretty Priscilla Lane was top-billed, in a role turned down by Barbara Stanwyck.)

--
CONT

reply

And in "Dial M" we're to believe that another world class beauty, Grace Kelly, is panting over him.

---

Inexplicable...PERHAPS more acceptable in 1954. Though they do make the point that Milland is venal as they come(Margot sensed this, along with HIS infidelity). I think giving Grace Kelly over to Robert Cummings at the end of Dial M is rather a quiet kind of "Hays Code" censorship -- cheat on your husband, the best you're going to get is...Robert Cummings.

Keep in mind that in his movies where "the villain has the real lead," the hero was cast with a lesser star:

Shadow of a Doubt: Villain is Joseph Cotton; hero is MacDonald Carey
Strangers on a Train: Villain is Robert Walker; hero is Farley Granger
Dial M: Villain is Ray Milland(Best Actor Oscar winner for The Lost Weekend); hero is Robert Cummings
Psycho: Villain is Anthony Perkins; hero is MCA contract player and Rock Hudson clone John Gavin

and even in the "no star" Frenzy, the guy playing the villain(Barry Foster) is more interesting than the guy playing the hero(Jon Finch.)

With big stars like Cary Grant and James Stewart, THEIR villains were played by supporting players(Claude Rains, John Dall, Farley Granger, Raymond Burr, Bernard Miles, Tom Helmore). Only James Mason vs Grant in NXNW was really evenly matched.


reply