MovieChat Forums > The Caine Mutiny (1954) Discussion > Would they have really hung him?

Would they have really hung him?


Had it not gone the way it did, had he not broken down on the stand, what would have been Maryk's sentence? It's not as if he took over the ship so that he could then go make war on Mexico. He did it to save the ship - which he deemed necessary in a situation where 3 out of 197 ships were lost, so the risk is not non-existent.

I think they would have taken this into consideration, and given him a very light sentence, maybe a few months.





I want the doctor to take your picture so I can look at you from inside as well.

reply

What does the MCOJ say about a conviction (and sentencing)? I doubt they would care much abnout motivation these are inflexable people when it comes to chain of command.

Kisskiss, Bangbang

reply

I doubt he would've hanged . . . maybe?

reply

And what about Keith, who was the OOD at the time? I doubt he would have been hanged in any event, but I would think he would have been sentenced to 6 months or so.

reply

Very possible. It was wartime. Eddie Slovik was executed for desertion in 1945 though he was only one executed for desertion in over twenty thousand cases. I would think a mutiny would be treated even harsher because it essentially put not just the ship but many men in danger. At the minimum the sentence would be prison with hard labor.

reply

I don't think the maximum sentence for the official charge against Maryk was death. In the novel (don't remember about the movie), Maryk was not officially charged with mutiny, but with a lesser offense called "conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline." In the book, the maximum penalty for what Maryk was charged with was dismissal (being cashiered as an officer) and 15 years in prison.

reply

Interesting. Thanks!

By the way, how's the book?




I want the doctor to take your picture so I can look at you from inside as well.

reply

You're welcome.

(The book's great.)

reply

Well, if it's any indication, I am re-reading the book for the fourth time.

--
If I cannot smoke cigars in heaven, I shall not go!

reply


I's my favorite book. I've read it at least once or twice a year for the last twenty-two years. :-)


I'm new, please be kind!

reply

That's awesome. Have you, by chance, read The Caine Mutiny Court Martial?

--
If I cannot smoke cigars in heaven, I shall not go!

reply

The maximum penalty for mutiny was at the time, I believe, death by hanging.

In the book though, Maryk is not charged with mutiny at all.

When Greenwald is assigned the case by Captain Breakstone -the presiding Judge Advocate of the local district- he's asked his assessment of the case. Greenwald says that the charge of mutiny is absurd. Maryk used an Article in Naval Regulations to relieve Queeg -he may have misapplied it to commit a mutinous act, but the Article IS there. There was never a hint of violence or even disrespect. Etc. He sums it up by saying that Maryk was very careful to stay within the legal grounds covered by the Article. He says that the strongest charge that could apply is conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline. Captain Breakstone -who'd previously been irked by Greenwald's shambling demeanor and quiet self-assurance he could get Maryk acquitted- had a sharp increase in his opinion of Greenwald, as those were points he'd noted himself. He tells Greenwald that a charge of mutiny was just the recommendation by the Board of Inquiry (a one man board; an old captain from the mine force who'd never even looked at Courts & Boards -the book on legal matter- before being sent to the Caine). He -Breakstone- is drawing up the formal charge, and it in fact would be conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline.

The charge is described in the book as a catch-all charge for such incidents that fall between the cracks of standard charges.

reply