How old is Peter Pan supposed to be?

Peter's age was always left open to interpretation, Barrie never goes into detail about what Peter actually looks like or how old he might actually be, as Peter himself really has no idea how old he is. But he has appeared at many ages, the statue in Kensington Gardens shows someone who I would put at about seven or eight, though the films show someone in about late childhood and the book is just complete vague saying that he's as tall as Wendy, but Wendy is only said to be a girl of not yet 13 and he still has all his baby teeth.

If I had to make a guess I would say physically he's about 12 years old, though mentally I think he's probably about seven years old, maybe younger. I think an irony about Peter is that being in Kensington Gardens w/fairies so long he probably thinks he's a lot younger then he actually is.

[deleted]

Yeah I figured Wendy as 12 going on 13. And Peter being about the same age, maybe 14 at the most, but no younger then 12.

I got ADHD and I don't take meds, yet I still got through college.

I end up picturing a non-cartoon Disney Peter as Bobby Driscoll, whose voice had already changed (he was 14-15 during production and turned 16 right after it came out)... So, he's actually one of the older Peters. I'm pretty sure that the voice recording was done when Bobby was 14 (again, I mention the voice change), but a lot of the drawings were based on Bobby from 14 to 15 (and it does show--Walt wasn't particularly happy with the fact that the artists were copying Bobby so closely and thought the drawings looked too old). Honestly, the best frames of the film's animation are the ones that look the most like young teenage Bobby.

Kathryn Beaumont was 13-14 during production.

I wouldn't put Disney's Wendy or Peter below 12, largely because Bobby's voice did not belong to a little kid and he made no attempt to sound like one. Bobby's young teenage Peter was also a lot more sympathetic and heroic than the one in the book. Peter in the book is more of a tragically-flawed character (him being incomplete and like a dead child is what comes off as tragic), whereas Bobby's is portrayed as a wonderful, heroic magical being that inspires the young and old alike to have childlike wonder. They are very different.

Yep Mary Darling heard the Peter Pan legend when she was a young girl herself. What she heard was that Peter Pan was a character that lived among fairies and escorted children who had died part of way to the afterlife so they wouldn't be scared.

From now on I speak my mind and I bow down to no one.

Yeah I love the story but always thought it was a little WEIRD that Tinkerbell had a crush on Peter, he was just a young boy, she Tinkerbell always had the appearance of a grown adult WOMAN.

Just because we lose today's battle doesn't mean we've lost tommorow's war.

Hook is wearing the clothes of a 17th century pirate (and classical pirates were largely wiped out by the very early 18th century). Captain Hook traditionally both looks and dresses a lot like Louis XIV or Charles II. He's no later than the early 18th century (full-backed periwigs and the long-skirted jackets were still in use for the first few decades, though really looks more late 17th century). Baroque, certainly. Looks very Restoration-era, in particular.

Also, Peter Pan's grave is mentioned in the book (the grave reads "P.P."). It is extremely old and worn.

And if we're talking about the Disney version, its vaguely Robin Hood-esque fashion suggests Medieval times. Hook's flashback, of course, suggests an Edwardian background (but that's more Wendy's background--and he's already ancient by her time). Hook's age is clearly a big hint that they've all been stuck in Neverland for a really, really long time and Peter most certainly predates Hook's arrival in the land. He's undoubtedly many hundreds of years old, simply because Hook is, too.