SPOILERS
That's an interesting take, I thought the exact opposite! The characters and plot were mundane, the love story ridiculous (I skipped ahead during most of that), and the refreshing approach was how the Indians attacked with the arrows in the final big fight. Of course it was overblown but it was a novel (for a western) and entertaining way the Indians attacked. Besides the arrow attack at the end how did the Indians (and Whites for that matter) behave differently than in a million other westerns? Throughout the film the Indians rode by the pinned-down "good guys" (outnumbering them 10 to 1) like ducks in a shooting range just yards away, the Indians were lousy shots (or always missed a vital part of the body) and the whites couldn't miss. A ludicrous scene was one where the Indians on horseback were circling a small party of whites and shooting at them in the middle of the circle while undoubtedly shooting their own at the same time! That was cringe-worthy and insulting to Indians or anybody else! LOL
Borrowing your line you could have said that most anything that occurred in the picture would have never happened like that! But I did like the locations and cinematography- some very nice compositions. The soundtrack was pretty forgettable. The film gets a basic DVD treatment (a preview & scene selections) with a decent mastering but not a clean restoration. This isn't a classic film by any means.
reply
share