MovieChat Forums > Strangers on a Train (1951) Discussion > purpose of scene with blind old man xing...

purpose of scene with blind old man xing the street


I just saw the movie again after a decade (or two) I saw it first time.

I just remembered the main plot but I only had a vague idea of what scenes actually happen during the movie.

Then there came the scene when the villain helped a blind old man to cross the street and I immediately said to myself that this nicety is going to break the neck of him because the old man will be the one who is going to testify that it was him who was at the amusement park, not guy.

well, I remembered wrong, I must have mingled another movie's story into this one.

but to me the question remains: why did hitchcock let the villain do this? it is a short sequenz that is - finally - leading to nowhere and therefore unnecessary to the main story and what happens at the amusement park, while on the other hand is carried out meticulously in a quite lengthy way.

what was the purpose of this scene?

reply

IMO the blind man was introduced to show the contrasts in Hugos thought patterns.

Almost right after murdering a young lady, he helps a blind man to cross the street, which doesn't seem to make much sense. Should the blind man been involved in the 'criss cross' senario, he would have murdered the blind man, and helped the young lady across the street. Hugo steps out of the real world for a moment, but can step right back into it, as if nothing had happened....but

....I'm not doing a great job on this so wait for someone else to come along :)

Vesele Vianoce!!!! http://www.iarelative.com/czech/xmas/index.html

reply

i'm pretty sure helping the blind man cross the street was a successful attempt to blend in and not look suspicious. instead of looking like he's fleeing the scene (he had already been spotted), he looks like he's just a good samaritan.

reply

[deleted]

^^precisely

reply


I thought the scene was done to add an extra dimension to Bruno. So often, bad guys are just EVIL who have no shred of decency to them. But by doing a good deed, we can see that Bruno is a bad guy, but he's not a complete monster, which in real life is how most criminals are. They do bad things, but it is not as if they will ONLY do bad things.

To me the scene showed that Bruno is evil, but he is still human.

reply

It was an irony in Bruno's character. One minute he murders, the next he helps a blind man across the road.

Strangers on a Train exhibits a very dark sense of humour (as all Hitchcock's films did, to one degree or another).

- - - - - - - -
www.davidlrattigan.blogspot.com
www.dictionaryofhammer.com

reply

I see it as yet another way to show us just how truly creepy and amoral Bruno is. Treating Guy to lunch, proposing the criss-cross murders, getting a manicure from Mom, popping a child's balloon, killing Miriam, helping a blind man across the street, stalking Guy to insist that he kill his father, making slightly-too-enthusiastic small talk . . . it's all the same to him.

Except when he's freaking out -- in a rage or transfixed by the similarity of Barbara's glasses to Miriam's. :::shudder:::

reply

I have always thought that it was Bruno telling himself what a nice person he is - thus justifying the murders (in his own warped mind)... He can say that his father "needed killing," and if that is the case, then Guy's wife must "need killing," too. However - he is a person who goes out he goes out of his way to help blind men cross the street. Therefore he must be nice.

This rationalization is used by Hitchcock elsewhere - it is not unlike Norman Bates' "mother." (See? I wouldn't even hurt a fly.)

reply

I kinda thought the blind man would testify or something, too. For another movie with a blind man testifying against a serial killer, check out "M".

reply

To get to the other side.

reply

that would have been an ingenious shout-out to M if that had happened - or if the blind man just sorta said aloud that he recognised that guy's voice or touch or scent when Bruno returned to the scene, which in turn alerted the authorities

reply

It seems to me that he chose the old blind man to deflect attention from himself. The murder has just been committed and all around are looking for a murderer fleeing the scene, not a good samaritan helping an old blind man accross the street. Yes Bruno was very clever, but ultimately not quite clever enough. He was after all a psychopath who let his emotions get the better of him.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

I tend to think that Bruno helped the old man cross the street more out of self-interest than out of kindness. As a few posters have mentioned, he probably just wanted to blend in and not look suspicious. He also could have figured that performing such a kind act in public would help him on the off chance that somebody recognized him from the crime scene and alerted the police. He probably thought that the police would never think that a man kind enough to help a blind man cross the street could commit cold blooded murder.

reply

I personally think the only reason he did it was just to help get away from the scene.. notice that he held his hand up to traffic to get him across.. The blind man was there at the right time, a good excuse.. just so he himself could get across more quickly.

reply

Good point there. I initially thought it was the other reasons mentioned previously - he wanted to blend in as to not appear guilty or he's just that psychotic, being able to murder then appear to be somewhat normal seamlessly

reply


"well, I remembered wrong, I must have mingled another movie's story into this one."

You might be thinking of the Peter Lorre movie "M" which has an old blind man testifying against an evil child predator.

reply


Also, in THE INFORMER, Gypo Nolan tells the black-and-tans the whereabouts of his old colleague and receives 20 pounds reward. He goes out the back door of the stationhouse and runs into a man in the fog and begins strangling him. He stops when he realizes the guy is blind and places a coin in his hand. Much later, at the IRA inquiry,as Gypo blusters and accuses an innocent tailor of being the informer, the blind man is brought in as one of the witnesses and produces the coin Gypo gave him.
"We're fighting for this woman's honor, which is more than she ever did."

reply

I believe it was Hitchcock's homage to fellow director Fritz Lang, who -- in his 1931 movie "M" -- had a blind character identify a criminal by the tune he whistled after committing a crime.
Hitchcock probably hoped that the moviegoers would remember that plot idea and assume that the blind man in "Strangers" would eventually identify Bruno as the criminal. That brief scene was Hitchcock's throw-away "red herring."
Another cinephile has pointed out a similar situation in John Ford's 1935 movie "The Informer."

reply

It just adds to the complexity of Bruno’s character, an ironic touch and another reference to eyeglasses ("the murder on the fairground island, reflected in Miriam's glasses").


------- __@
----- _`\<,_
---- (*)/ (*)------- ----__@
--------------------- _`\<,_
---- -----------------(*)/ (*)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:*•.. ¤°.¸¸.•´¯`»nec spe,nec metu :*•.. ¤°.¸¸.•´¯`»

reply