MovieChat Forums > Strangers on a Train (1951) Discussion > Guy should have tanked the match

Guy should have tanked the match


Did it not occur to Guy to tank the tennis match? He's looking at his watch the entire time trying to win in 3 sets... in the end he's locked at 10 all in the fourth set before winning. If he'd just played underwhelming he'd have easily finished the match a good 90 minutes to 2 hours quicker and he would have got to the fairground in plenty of time.

Apart from that and the fact a couple of cops thought it was a smart idea to fire shots into a carousel on which children were riding (what were they thinking, seriously) this was quite a good film.

I'm writing this signature in bold so people know it's a signature

reply

In his own words: "I may have unwittingly entered into an agreement to commit murder, but I would NEVER stoop to deliberately losing a tennis match."

"Worthington, we're being attacked by giant bats!"

reply

Before the match, when talking to Anne (I think), they discuss whether he should just forfeit the match, but conclude that the watching detectives would then know something was up. So he has to go ahead with the match and, what's more, make it seem authentic. Initially the match seems to be going easy, and, of course, Guy ultimately wins the match. So perhaps he felt the quickest way to end the match was to win. If you're 2 sets to love up, is it not easier to close out the last set than to let your opponent win 3 sets? I can't remember the exact score in the game, but I'm pretty sure Guy eventually wins by more than one set - if the match was level and evenly balanced, then throwing the game might make sense. But the fact that he's well on top, and then falters as nerves get to him - it makes sense to me that the easiest thing would be to try to win out, as the quickest way to finish the match.

reply

It did require a rather large suspension of disbelief, especially with the rapid back and forth of Bruno fishing around for the lighter and the same time Guy struggling to finish out a match that he could have ended at any time by simply faking an injury or saying he had a bad stomach ache and couldn't play on. Of course in real life you'd have to be as nutty as Bruno to let a sense of honor potentially foil your only chance of clearing yourself of a murder rap. And it's not like he was playing at Wimbledon...heck, it wasn't even a professional tournament! lol

Still, most movies have scenes or situations that you just have to play along with. But for me the carousel scene was especially jarring and not so easy to go along with. For it's not like Guy was waving a gun around and thus seen as an immediate threat to both the police and the public. There you could more easily swallow a cop losing his cool and shooting into a crowd. Here, though, so what if he started running? Just run after him.

I understand why it was included in the film (to get the carousel careening out of control), but it ended up distracting me from the scene and even soured me to it somewhat.

I really didn't think i could come up with a good signature, but happily i thought of this one.

reply

And it's not like he was playing at Wimbledon...heck, it wasn't even a professional tournament!
------------------------------------

I don't think there were any pro tennis players back then, it was an amateur sport. And this was supposed to be the US Open, a very big deal.

reply

Ah okay thanks. I didn't realize it was the US Open. That does make it somewhat more plausible (though i still don't buy that in real life he wouldn't have faked an injury once things started going longer than he was counting on, US Open or not, considering what was at stake for him).

I really didn't think i could come up with a good signature, but happily i thought of this one.

reply

I always wondered about throwing the match 3 sets to love. But then Edam cheese without the holes just ain't edam cheese. Most of Hitch's films can be taken apart, but they're great and this was one of the best.

reply