MovieChat Forums > Quo Vadis (1951) Discussion > I think this film should be remade.

I think this film should be remade.


I think a remake would do very well. Perhaps the actor Vin Diesel could have a role in it. He could do well in any number of roles. Do you agree or disagree? Why or why not?

Learn a new language, explore a new world.

GOD LOVES PEOPLE!!!

reply

It was remade, twice:

(1) a two-part TV movie, a European co-production starring Klaus-Maria Brandauer as Nero in 1985, (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0089870/) which wasn't terribly well received

(2) a Polish version which appeared as both a theatrical feature film in 2001 and a longer TV series in 2003 (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0282108/) which didn't get very much attention in the US or UK.


Call me Ishmael...

reply

[deleted]

Vin has a sag card so he does qualify as an actor.

Chris Hansen NBC Dateline my hero.


reply

I have a good friend in the US Army who spends his spare time in group shots in films. He and all the others with whom he does this all have SAG cards too. Trust me they are not actors in any way. They laugh about this all the time. I would bet many "Actors" like Vin D would actually fall more in this category. They may have their cards but that does not mean they can act. I certainly would not ever pay to see Vin again! I made that mistake only once.

reply

[deleted]

It was remade, twice:

(1) a two-part TV movie, a European co-production starring Klaus-Maria Brandauer as Nero in 1985, (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0089870/) which wasn't terribly well received

(2) a Polish version which appeared as both a theatrical feature film in 2001 and a longer TV series in 2003 (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0282108/) which didn't get very much attention in the US or UK.

None of them became as well-known as this version though, did they? What we need is a new version, that becomes well-known all over the world and is more true to the original novel.

Yes, it's true! IMDB has reached Sweden!

reply

This is an Adaptation of an 18th Century Novel which I wouldn't be to intrested in as much as I loved this film.

I'd rather they just follow the History of Nero and the Early Church.

http://www.RonPaul2008.com/
Our only Hope for a Decent President.

reply

It's actually a 19th Century novel, published in 1895.


Call me Ishmael...

reply

I would like a remake too, a version more true to the novel.

Yes, it's true! IMDB has reached Sweden!

reply

I'd prefer more true to History, which Novel it's elf really isn't.

Nero was actualy a Very competent Ruler despite his Vices and also very Popular with Most of the Roman population, only the Upper classes who had to deal wiht him first hand saw him for who he was, and ironically they themselves weren't much better, possibly worse.

And Making Poppea the little evil Voice in Nero's ear is a very tiered cliche of this genre, According to Josephus Poppea was actualy a very Moral person, and he knew her Personally.

http://www.RonPaul2008.com/
Our only Hope for a Decent President.

reply

The common people have usually not been able to tell whether a ruler is good or not. They are all the same to them, rich people far away from them, living in luxury. But just because they didn't bother the commoners, it doesn't mean that Nero and Poppaea deserve a different portraital than this. Nero was after all Caligula's nephew. Madness ran in the family. And when Poppaea married this man, you have to wonder about her too. She obviously became the wife of a madman just because of the power she could get as an empress. I also believe that Henryk Sienkiewicz did as much research before writing his novel as one could do in the late 19th century. He actually describes an ancient Rome, which is very close to today's view of it.

Yes, it's true! IMDB has reached Sweden!

reply

I wasn't trying to defend Nero, he was Mad but he wasn't an incompetent Idiot, unlike Caligula he had been trained since his Youth to be Emperor.

Poppaea was very friendly to the Jews, and I tend to believe what Josephus said being the only person to write abut her who actually knew her, if she contributed to the decision to Persecute Christianity at all, it was probably cause of unkind things she heard about them from her Jewish friends.

http://www.RonPaul2008.com/
Our only Hope for a Decent President.

reply

[deleted]

I don't think anyone could do better than Peter Ustinov as the emperor Nero.

reply

Okay, that's true. He was great.

Yes, it's true! IMDB has reached Sweden!

reply

[deleted]

There was a mini-series in 1985. I don't particularly recommend it.

reply

[deleted]

I would like a remake too, a version more true to the novel.


So would I.
I loved the novel, but Deborah Kerr's Lygia was just so insipid and one dimensional. In the book she had feelings and turmoils like any human Christian.
Likewise Vinicius was all wrong. He was never jealous of Lygia's Christianity. It was something that he thought added to her appeal.


Love is never having to say you're sober.

reply

See I'd prefer something that isn't mostly about made up characters, but people who where involved, funny how every Movie abut Nero's Persecution shows only Peter or Paul's death, not Both.

Actually a little known fact is the Apocryphal acts of Peter has Paul coming to Rome after Peter's dead and convincing Nero to stop the Persecution.

BTW Paul's epistles imply Paul was in fact initially acquitted in the trial before Nero Acts set up for but never showed, the Persecution came latter.

I'd also like to see how the Events in Judea leading to the Jewish revolt tied into these events.

Baldwin08.com
The next best thing to Ron Paul!

reply

So would I.
I loved the novel, but Deborah Kerr's Lygia was just so insipid and one dimensional. In the book she had feelings and turmoils like any human Christian.
Likewise Vinicius was all wrong. He was never jealous of Lygia's Christianity. It was something that he thought added to her appeal.

Actually, I have more understanding for Lygia in this movie than for Lygia in the book. In the book, I found Lygia very stupid. As I've said in many other threads on this board, Marcus Vinicius was much more sympathetic in the book than in this movie. So I just don't get why Lygia didn't just tell him about her Christian faith in the book. She just decided to run away from him, without telling him why. Well, okay, even in the book, Lygia had been forced to leave her pious foster home for the decadent imperial palace, and MV managed to get drunk in front of her, which completely turned her off. But I still think she should have explained things to him, since he basically was a good guy. Nero's former mistress Acte understood her Christian faith, but she couldn't understand how she could want to run away from a young handsome rich man like Marcus Vinicius. But in this movie, I sure can understand why Lygia ran away from him, because MV was a pompous jerk in that version. One can even wonder what she had seen in him in the first place.

Yes, it's true! IMDB has reached Sweden!

reply

I believe that much of your puzzlement is due to Sienkiewicz's 19th century-perspective on how people should or should not behave, his Christian values etc.

They differ a lot from modern views - and understandably so.

reply

by linguist1967 (Thu Mar 8 2007 05:04:49) Ignore this User | Report Abuse


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think a remake would do very well. Perhaps the actor Vin Diesel could have a role in it. He could do well in any number of roles. Do you agree or disagree? Why or why not?

Learn a new language, explore a new world.

GOD LOVES PEOPLE!!!

You're kidding.... right?

reply

This film needs a remake!!

reply