Alice's pregnancy


Am I mistaken, or is the pregnancy never mentioned after Alice was dead? Nothing about "murdering this innocent girl and her unborn baby?" George's lawyer doesn't mention it, with DNA testing decades away he might have been able to make a case about the baby being fathered by someone else and Alice was trying to force George into accepting responsibility. Just a thought. I imagine the movie was shocking in its day, being about an unwed mother.

reply

It was mentioned...the doctor whom Alice consulted was brought to the stand, it's just that only a brief portion of his testimony is shown.

with DNA testing decades away he might have been able to make a case about the baby being fathered by someone else and Alice was trying to force George into accepting responsibility.

If I understand this correctly, you're saying that George's defense should have pled guilty, in that case arguing that murder was a reasonable solution?

Bloody hell mate, DNA testing may have been decades away, but pure logic wasn't that distant.

"...if that was off, I'd be whoopin' your ass up and down this street." ~ an irate Tarantino

reply

Read it again, mate.

reply

I just watched this movie and there was no mention that Alice had been pregnant. Maybe an autopsy wasn't done or she wasn't far enough along to tell although she looked like about 4 months to me. Or perhaps she wasn't really pregnant at all.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"Let's not ask for the moon, we have the stars".

reply

That is the part i don't get either, no DNA testing, the laws at that time were more in favor of the guys when the two people weren't married. George could have been "that is not my baby Alice, you are on your own, if you bother me again I'll call the cops on you for harassment." The police would side with him too, he is an upper crust, they would take her away and tell her not to mess with him and his family.

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

reply


About the only test they could've done back then was a blood test; but of course, you'd have to wait for the baby to be born.
"May I bone your kipper, Mademoiselle?"

reply

Well he was working towards being an upper crust. He might or might not have had back up.

reply

[deleted]

Is is possible the state didn't want to mention it because it would have made Alice less sympathetic to the jury?


This is an interesting point, actually. In those days an unmarried mother was looked down upon (that's not to say that she deserved her fate as a result of her pregnancy).

However, the doctor was on the stand and being questioned. Although we don't see Raymond Burr ask the doctor pointed questions in front of the jury, I think we are meant to surmise that the issue of Alice's 'condition' was brought up, otherwise, why have the doctor at the trial?


Do the P-I-G-E-O-N

reply

I was left wondering if there was any proof of the pregnancy at all. When they are in the boat and she's talking about the future. She mentions that they can both get jobs and make it work, with no mention of the baby. I was wondering if she just made it all up?

I guess I'll have to read the play.

reply

No she didn't make it up, it was confirmed by the doctor who examined her. It was hinted that she was hoping he would perform an abortion but in a round about way it was made clear he wouldn't.

Siri
Don't Make Me Have to Release the Flying Monkeys!


reply

This whole plot line was iffy. The code of "ethics" from the Hayes office could pull the plug on any film that didn't live up to their strange standards. Unwed pregnancy was at the top of that list. My guess is the screenwriters didn't want to push it.

reply

Not to mention hinting at a woman wanting an abortion.

reply