MovieChat Forums > A Place in the Sun (1951) Discussion > Clift pulled the wool over our eyes

Clift pulled the wool over our eyes


One of the most calculated villains in movie history. Clift is mesmerizing as George Eastman. Evil. Cold. Elusive. Murderous. A charmer gifted with excellent good looks. Acted dumb, and continued to do so all the way to the electric chair as to not betray his intent. George Eastman is so much more than a single character...he is the American ideal of making it to the top by any means necessary. And as we have come to realize by proof, many American people of high stature wind up as self destructed fools of avarice . Cheers to Montgomery Clift and his amazing performance of ideology and greed. Does no one else see this perfect performance of selfishness?

reply

I'm going to have to agree and disagree. Yes he did act extremely selfish but I think if any man with a will to live a happy life was put in that situation they would think/do the same. Alice was also being extremely selfish though, and I'm even going to go further by saying more selfish than George. He was literally being blackmailed, Alice's happiness or his, but he had no choice. "Oh you'll see, we'll live a happy life together." "If you don't marry me I'll tell all the world then kill myself." See what I mean? I'd give it a 70/30 split for Alice being more selfish than George.

reply

Yeah, but George was the one who impregnated Alice. He owed her something. She was only demanding her rights. And even if that doesn't make sense to a modern worldview, it totally would have been expected in 1951.

reply

What you say was, I imagine, even more true in 1949, the year this completed filming.

Please excuse typos/funny wording; I use speech-recognition that doesn't always recognize!

reply

Alice was one depressing woman. The marriage would have never lasted as George did not love her. She did blackmail him to marry her. He should have never touched her to start with. George really made his own bed. I agree she was more selfish than George.

reply

but I think if any man with a will to live a happy life was put in that situation they would think/do the same.


Yep, all it takes is one little push for any man to sit there and watch a pregnant woman (with his own baby, no less) drown........

reply

How was she selfish? No he shouldn't have been messing with her but, he ruined her life. Things weren't as easy for unwed women back then.

reply

"I think if any man with a will to live a happy life was put in that situation they would think/do the same."

Really? So all us men who want to break up with some woman are just murderers plotting an opportunity so we can kill them and get away with it? Okay.

reply

Clift's performance is among the greatest in the medium, but not for those reasons.

His George isn't a devious architect or manipulative opportunist; he's a tragic, pitiable victim of circumstance who IS innocent of the crime he's convicted for.

"...if that was off, I'd be whoopin' your ass up and down this street." ~ an irate Tarantino

reply

That's how he wanted you to feel! George was not an upstanding man...and the only conscience he had was the one telling him to run. No remorse for Alice...no love for Angela...just himself.

reply

I agree. I don't think he was as calculating as you make him out to be, but he definitely wasn't upstanding....

reply

That's how he wanted you to feel!

Yeah, because he was playing all of this out in front of a movie camera, for an audience.

"...if that was off, I'd be whoopin' your ass up and down this street." ~ an irate Tarantino

reply

He has elements of both:

a tragic, pitiable victim of circumstance who IS innocent of the crime he's convicted for.


but also:

not an upstanding man...and the only conscience he had was the one telling him to run. No remorse for Alice...no love for Angela...just himself.


He was pitiable initially and he didn't actually follow through with his crazy idea of killing her but where he fails as a decent man is in what he does after Alice drowns. Instead of reporting the accident to the authorities, he runs and tries to cover his tracks.

Do the P-I-G-E-O-N

reply

I think you have a better assessment of the character than most do here. Many see him and this film in the modern American lens as compared as to how he was meant to be seen then. Funny, I think many classic american films can be better understood by either Asians or Africans than the modern westerner who is either a chauvinist or an antimale feminist.

reply

OK, I totally agree! Although it was late in the evening, he could have shouted for help.

reply

[deleted]

Theodore Dreisser would be proud.

reply

Theodore Dreisser would be proud.

reply

Let's keep it in perspective: Clift killed the other girl in order to marry Elizabeth Taylor(!). It may be evil, but it strikes me as a perfectly reasonable thing to do.

reply

Good point, and who can blame him? Everybody's gotta go sometime, and Shelley Winters and Liz Taylor are both gone now anyway. Ironically, Monty went first. I miss them all.

reply

He didn't *kill* her. At worst, he didn't save her. This made me think of Camus and The Stranger.

At any rate, Clift obviously loved Taylor AND her world of wealth and family. He loved all of that and wanted to be rid of his old life of being destitute and miserable.

Theoretically we don't even know if Alice really was pregnant. Them's the breaks, right? I'm a guy, so I think Clift could have taken responsibility WITHOUT being blackmailed into marriage and a life with a selfish, horrible, screeching woman.

reply

I totally agree with your post, as opposed to the original whereby Clift's character was "one of the most calculated villains in movie history". George Eastman was offered an opportunity to live and work in an environment polar opposite from his former existence. I don't believe he had an evil agenda before embarking on his new life. If anything, George was a victim of bad timing, and had he just waited one more night, the pregnancy probably wouldn't have been an issue (as we all well know, every woman got pregnant the first time back then).
One thing I've noticed throughout this thread is that nobody brought up George's change of heart during the boat ride, which took place shortly before Shelley stood up in the boat. He warned her not to stand up in the boat, but it was to no avail. And, yes, he did make an attempt to find and save her, rather than just swim away; however, he didn't swim directly toward where she fell in.
I didn't see Clift's character as one of a calculated killer or devoid of love for another besides himself. Quite the contrary. Sure, Shelley was really becoming a deterrent to Clift's plans with Liz, and given the opportunity I might consider doing away with her, as she was becoming an out of control shrew. But he definitely was in love with Angela (Liz). She also seemed to be the only one who wanted to interact with him at the swanky party.
One character I thought was funny was Raymond Burr as the DA - hell-bent on frying poor Georgie. The boat sequence in court was hilarious and so over the top. Every time I watch this movie, I can't help but laugh my ass off when Mr. Burr starts in with his theatrics.

reply

Was he in love in Angela? He seemed in love with Alice till someone rich came along.

reply

What do you mean he didn't "kill" her?

You missed a key part of the movie. It was murder because he 1) Set it up, 2) Didn't try to save her, and 3) Tried to cover it up and escape. One needs all three parts to convict.

What was debatable for a lesser charge was whether he was able to save her, but the jury and the audience believed he would have been able to. If he was unconscious or danger of drowning himself, then it would have been different. If he was not physically able to save her, then it would not be murder. The movie clarified his state of mind at the end.

A better strategy would have been to not put George on the stand. Then the prosecution would have had to show the means or how it happened since there were no other witnesses.

I wondered about the pregnancy, too, since it was not brought into the trial.

reply

It was strange to watch the movie unfold - Clift was handsome & seemed nice in the beginning, but we soon learn how cold & calculating he could be; living his "double life". How he lied and went from Alice to Angela and back & forth as easily as a change of clothes. I agree w/ the above poster - he plotted the murder & set it up, he made ZERO effort to save her - he even admitted he was thinking of Angela as Alice slipped helplessly into the water, he never went for help or anything - only made every effort to cover it all up as if nothing had happened, and went back to Angela's arms again. To me, George Eastman was more of a monster than Norman Bates. I say that b/c George was of sound mind - he was not crazy and he knew full well what he was doing. He impregnated Alice and then discarded her & their unborn child as if they were nothing more than garbage, and he did it in cold blood and w/o any kind of remorse. He never thought of poor Alice again or the baby - all he can do is feel sorry for himself and imagine Angela's kiss over & over again right up till the end. He was a very unsympathetic character to me.

"Are you going to your grave with unlived lives in your veins?" ~ The Good Girl

reply

Reminds me of Teddy Kennedy.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"Let's not ask for the moon, we have the stars".

reply

Exactly, jasonbourneagain. In NY two people were convicted of murder when they picked up a drunk in their car and just dropped him off alone on a highway, where he was struck by a car and killed. I think it was called a "depraved indifference" murder.
George knew Alice couldnt swim. It was pretty clear what he had in mind. Just like Gene Tierney's character in "Leave Her to Heaven."






Get me a bromide! And put some gin in it!

reply

Crazy America where a burglar who slips on a puddle in the housr he planned to rob wins his case against them.

reply

Exactly, jasonbourneagain. In NY two people were convicted of murder when they picked up a drunk in their car and just dropped him off alone on a highway, where he was struck by a car and killed. I think it was called a "depraved indifference" murder.
George knew Alice couldnt swim. It was pretty clear what he had in mind. Just like Gene Tierney's character in "Leave Her to Heaven."






Get me a bromide! And put some gin in it!

reply

Alice did not die because of his actions. She died because of her actions. She stood up in a row boat in the middle of a lake, capsized it, and was hit in the head by it. She caused her own death.

reply

And he left her to die and tried to cover it up. Though I don't know if that deserved the chair.

reply

Maybe and maybe not. It would matter if the rich guys cared to back him up. You are rather bitter. Makes me wonder about your history. It does take two to make a child.

reply

Reasonable to gain high social status. Which doesn't make it right.

reply

Yes! One of the most depressing novels I have ever read-- and one of the best film adaptations I have ever seen. Chilling, and cuts out all Dreiser's, shall we say, verbosity.

reply

it was a perfect performance on so many levels.

watching the movie can be chilling at times, with clifts acting, he is so real that i felt like i was watching a piece of real life unfold in front of me.

reply

That's an interesting angle, I suppose he could be read this way. However, that's not how I saw him. Sure that not everybody thinks of murder when they are annoyed by one person, but we all have angels and demons inside us. In fact, that's what Southern Gothic was based of - exposing the demons behind the wholesome surfaces. But George's demons were not particularly more vile or more deliberate than the typical demons. He was a simple man, with very little education and social know-how, guided by the usual ambitions - marry a beautiful woman and getting a good social position with a well-paid job. He bedded Alice because that's what boys do, we have to keep in mind that during the first Alice phase he had no real hope of getting into the high society and anywhere close to Angela.

Then, unexpectedly, the Heavens opened (he hadn't even planned to seduce Angela, she pretty much fell into his lap!). And Hell too, at the same time, when Alice turned our to be pregnant. I kept wanting to yell at the screen - did you two not know that making love leads to pregnancy?? - but this is modern awareness, what with all our means of contraception and sexual education; uneducated people did, and still do breed like rabbits, even when they have no real means of supporting large families...

And yes, a noble character in a Jane Austen novel would have given up Angela + good social position and married Alice without more than a sigh, but this movie is not a Jane Austen story, and how realistic were the lady's novels to begin with...

Sure that George's case in trial was ridiculous - "I thought to kill her, but then she died by herself!". But we had been there, had seen him, and we know that he is telling the truth. I believe that he was really much more passive than how you see him, most of what happened to him was fate toying with him. I am definitely not excusing his behavior towards Alice, I am merely trying to understand him - and again, I don't see in him more than the typical, human streak of egoism and meanness. But then, I don't believe in literal angels and demons.

there's a highway that is curling up like smoke above her shoulder

reply

Sure! We see them fall into the water and the boat capsize...but THEN we see a slow dissolve of what apparently is several minutes before he exits Loon Lake. We are never afforded the opportunity to see events unfolding once they are in the water to George scrambling extremely agitated and wild-eyed from Loon Lake. Yes, this angle is set-up for us to draw our own conclusions. My conclusion is he found the perfect chance to murder Alice. And he did...unseen to the audience. And he gambled on his boyish and dimwit mask to get him off on insufficient evidence. He gambled incorrectly, for as over-the-top Raymond Burr was as the prosecution, he saw right through Eastman's game. And Eastman was too proud to go to the chair confessing his guilt. He stuck like a sociopath right up to the end. Through Angela Vickers, he wanted prominence and wealth and success...he wanted his place in the sun. He didn't love her. He wanted her merely for sexual gratification while he clawed to own the Eastman company and beyond. I draw this conclusion because he would sleep with anything, anytime, as he presents by immediately breaking the company rule and bedding the easiest conquest possible right off the bat; Alice Tripp. Clift is so shrewd with his performance he succeeded in, as I will stick to, pulling off one of the screens greatest villains! Of course...its my opinion.

reply

I don't know...as a previous poster said, we're bringing modern sensibility into this. This film is set in the 40s (and the novel, I believe, is set around the turn of the 20th century), when the situation George was in essentially meant his life was over. Which is not to say what he did with Alice was right, just that the time frame the story was set in, along with the fact that George could finally see daylight in his search for the life he'd always wanted, at the very least brings pathos into the story, and does indeed make him a victim of circumstance (to an extent), and, IMHO, makes him less of the cunning, cold hearted criminal the OP described.

"You will not hear me scream!" "I Will.
But it is not your screams I want.
Only your life."

reply

I agree with you that George was a villain and Montgomery Clift pulled him off incredibly -- almost as incredible a job as he did with Morris Townsend in The Heiress. And of course... that's my opinion. :-)

reply

We are never afforded the opportunity to see events unfolding once they are in the water


Precisely! What we do see just moments before the boat turns over, is George pleading with Alice to sit down - because what she was doing was dangerous. We see his change of heart.

The boat goes over and then we see him dragging himself out of the water. Alice drowned by accident - do you think George swam to the other side of the boat and held her under the water? He never once came across to me as being so violent.

No, he didn't kill her, but what he did next was what sealed his fate. And that was to not raise the alarm. He signed his own death warrant by not reporting the accident to the authorities.

Through Angela Vickers, he wanted prominence and wealth and success...he wanted his place in the sun. He didn't love her. He wanted her merely for sexual gratification while he clawed to own the Eastman company and beyond.


Oh I disagree with you here. I believe he really did love Angela - sure he wanted to climb the ladder too and he was not unaware of Angela's 'connections' but from the minute he sees her on his first evening (and remember, he doesn't know who she is at this point) at his uncle's house, he's in love! It's written on his face every time he looks at her. Hell, even Alice sees it. The director labours this point by having George 'remember' his time with her whenever he's feeling low - the repeated images of them kissing, her beautiful face - that's what he's seeing in his mind's eye as he walks to the electric chair.

Do the P-I-G-E-O-N

reply

You think he didn't know sex led to a baby? He knew but, as you say. He got on top of her cause that's what guys do.

reply

Let's see...I can spend my life with a pregnant Shelly Winters, or I can marry a 19-year-old Elizabeth Taylor...hmmm. I don't think many people realize that George did NOT commit murder; it was accidental, or maybe at worst manslaughter.

For who would bear the whips and scorns of Hollywood... (;-p)

reply

Oh you cards! You crazy kids with your "Alice or Angela? Shelley Winters or Liz Taylor? Know who I'd choose! *wink wink, nudge nudge* Know worra mean? Eh!" etc. OK. We get the point. If you have a plain girl and you meet a beautiful one, just bump off the former. Beauty is its own justification.

Anyway, I jest. But besides this, there seems to be a tendency to defend George on the grounds that he's a simple, uneducated, poor, working-class boy who suddenly finds the Good Life almost - almost - within his grasp and is *astonished* by this fact. Because of this, it's understandable, so some of you say, that he conceives and plans the murder of a young woman who he's gotten up the duff.

No, he didn't go through with it, but he watched her die. She was carrying his son or daughter, and he watched her drown. (People questioning whether Alice *is*, in fact, pregnant, seem to forget the scene where she's alone at home and goes out to her mailbox - and she's noticeably in the early stages of pregnancy and walking accordingly. She's alone. Why would she be faking weight gain and a waddling walk as well as wearing a maternity smock when she's all alone?)

And what is Alice? She too, is simple, uneducated, poor and working-class. But she's a woman. Do the dreams and desires of the Good Life for a working-class girl, as opposed to boy, matter less, somehow? Alice's dreams were smaller than George's, admittedly, but they were her dreams. And what did she get for wanting 'a little house' and to do 'all the things that married couples do'? For caring for this man even though she knew he loved someone richer, someone more beautiful than she could ever hope to be ('Poor George' she says, holding out her arms to him)? She gets a watery grave, that's what.

reply

Well Said.

reply

How do you know he watched her die? He said the boat turned over and hit him over the head. With such a concussion, we don't know how strong and aware he was to just thread and watch her sink to the bottom. If anything, what he did after, pretending nothing happened was what did him in and made him look guilty.

reply

Sorry, what?
Movies (and movie characters) by definition do not have an ulterior reality beyond what is shown (either explicitly or implicitly). If there is any room for doubt, that will be shown accordingly.

I think the judge's final words sum up the reality in this case rather well.







reply

[deleted]