MovieChat Forums > The Day the Earth Stood Still (1951) Discussion > Klaatu aka a certain "Mister Carpenter".

Klaatu aka a certain "Mister Carpenter".


What could I possibly add that hasn't already been written about this expertly crafted sci-fi classic that 158 film critics (presumably of considerable scholarship coming from the position of being a respected authority either nationally or internationally on the subject of film critique) to say nothing of the 375 user reviews because let's face it, everyone thinks he or she is critic, myself, as limited and meager an offing as mine might be, included. Let's recap a few interesting tidbits of trivia most of us know about the film. Oscar winning director Robert Wise ("West Side Story", "The Sound of Music") and Oscar winning screenwriter Edmund H. North (Co-writer: "Patton") claim that the allegorical Christ-referent in alluding to Klaatu's alias while on earth of a certain "Mr. Carpenter" was purely coincidental and unintentional as astonishing as that confession by both men might be 63 years after the film's premiere. Still audiences simply can't resist drawing parallels. Klaatu is other-worldly. Christ demonstrated time and again to his many followers His other-worldliness (transmuting water molecules into wine, defying gravity by walking on water, resuscitating life in one who was pronounced dead by means of an electro-chemical discharge, etc.). Christ delivered a sermon on the mount. Klaatu delivered a message of warning from his interstellar spacecraft to several representatives of the scientific community representing the favored nations of the Earth, technically, not a mount but close enough. Christ was crucified. Klaatu was shot (twice in fairly close succession during the course of the film). Christ rose again from the dead after lying in a tomb for three days. Klaatu was revived with the personal assist of his traveling companion and intergalactic constable on patrol Gort. Christ then ascended into heaven and after Klaatu had conveyed his warning completing his mission on earth, does likewise. The parallels are not only irresistible, they're unavoidable. And, perhaps for this reason, more than any other any film critic or critic cum movie-lover (first), may have for commenting on this film, this is what resonates most with us who have loved and cherished this film over these many years. Because now, in the new millennium, more so than ever, we need a Christ/Klaatu to come around just to remind us to shape up and fly right...or else!

If you the reader and avid movie lover have any thoughts you'd care to share concerning this topic, the forum is open, by all means, let's hear from you. It's still a free country and your opinions matter everyone.

reply

Why do so many always have to bring Christianity into this conversation? I'm personally willing to give Wise and North the benefit of the doubt regarding their "coincidental and unintentional" comments, especially when considering that it's the message delivered by the movie that is most important, and not the source (just as it's the message delivered by the various religions/belief-systems around the world, and not the religion/belief-system itself).

For the sake of argument though, let's say that the name Carpenter WAS intentional and NOT coincidental. That begs the question of why Wise and North would suggest otherwise. Perhaps to take the focus off the name and direct it back towards the message delivered by the movie itself?

As far as the name Carpenter goes, that could just as easily be chalked up to the time period this movie was made. The name Carpenter at that time was likely just a popular/common name anyone could relate to same as Smith or Jones would be considered nowadays. People sometimes just see what they want to see though.

reply

Why do so many always have to bring Christianity into this conversation?


Which conversation are you talking about? The one the OP started?

He is drawing parallels between the message of mythical figures like Christ, and the message given by Klaatu. So you unwittingly just regurgitated the OP's point in a brusque, offhand manner.

~ I've been very lonely in my isolated tower of indecipherable speech.

reply

by Degree7 » Which conversation are you talking about? The one the OP started?

He is drawing parallels between the message of mythical figures like Christ, and the message given by Klaatu. So you unwittingly just regurgitated the OP's point in a brusque, offhand manner.

Actually, I didn't, because I was referring to all of the people the OP was referring to who try to assert the parallels the OP was drawing.

So no, I didn't unwittingly regurgitate anything, especially in the manner you asserted.

reply

In any case, the Christ references were purposeful.

The scriptwriter, Edmund North, referring to the Christian motifs, later commented: "...it was my private little joke. I never discussed this angle with Blaustein or Wise because I didn't want it expressed. I hoped the Christ comparisons would be subliminal."

There you are, straight from the horse's mouth.

reply

Gee...thanks. You make an accusation like that about me, and when you're the person proven unwitting and regurtatively brusque, your response is to offhandedly continue trying to make your own point.

No very Carpenter-like I must say.

reply

Sorry then. I just assumed you were being belligerent, but it seems I was the belligerent one. My apologies.

reply

Two things:

People actually think the references where coincidental, and, people think that the person Christ didn't exits?


Only those with no valid argument pick holes in people's spelling and grammar. 

reply