The epilogue to Fort Apache (1948) happens several years after the main action, since Lt. O'Rourke and Philadelphia Thursday have married and have at least one child, Michael Thursday York O'Rourke, who looks like he is a few years old. And York has been promoted at least one step.
If there are any shots of York in the epilogue clear enough to show his shoulder strap insignia, two leaves on each shoulder strap would make him a major or a lieutenant colonel, while one eagle on each shoulder strap would make him a colonel. York is addressed as "colonel" in the epilogue, so viewers should look for two items or one item in a shoulder strap to tell his rank. Anyway, years must have passed between the main action in Fort Apache and the epilogue.
So if York and Yorke are the same character, Lieutenant Colonel Yorke in Rio Grande (1950) should look older than Captain York in Fort Apache (1948). But then the question would be whether York in the epilogue to Fort Apache (1948) looks older than Yorke in Rio Grande (1950) and what their ranks are. We can hope that the one who looks older will have same rank or higher rank than the one who looks younger.
The ranks and apparent ages of York in the epilogue of Fort Apache and Yorke in Rio Grande should determine which comes first, the epilogue of Fort Apache or Rio Grande. Since Rio Grande should happen in 1879 or 1880, if the epilogue of Fort Apache could happen a few years later that would put it in the 1880s, and the main action of Fort Apache could be in the early or middle 1870s. But if the epilogue of Fort Apache happens before Rio Grande it could happen in the mid 1870s and the main action could happen in the early 1870s or late 1860s.
But if York and Yorke are two different characters comparing their apparent ages gives no clue to the fictional date of Fort Apache.
reply
share