Great response jeremy3. I'd also be apprehensive of Mickey's concern over his character's criminality in this movie. He was enjoying years of that Andy Hardy clean-cut reputation and now that the war was over 1950 was a pivotal time period in virtually all culture as we entered a promising second half of the 20th Century which held so much promise after the mistakes of the previous 50 years. I would expect Mickey was hungering for a post-war persona that could make use of the all-American image he had honed so masterfully. Patriotism was still very much in the air and I would expect Mickey Rooney (as opposed to Humphrey Bogart and others that had also honed their noir-esque, underworld and criminal characters) would have preferred to develop more noble characters, although the psychological underpinnings of this role made it a very propitious opportunity to go head to head with a master such as James Cagney and come out the more interesting character. I thought it was a great departure from his clean-cut image. Thank God for roles like Army in Requiem for a Heavyweight (1962. WHen I think of Mickey I like to remember him in that role rather than Andy Hardy. Of course, I think Ed Wynn was the quintessential Army (the character that cow-tows to Maish Rennick), especially when Keenan Wynn played together with his son Keenan who portrayed the Maish character in that original Rod Serling Playhouse 90 production. But when Mickey Rooney took the role. he gave it such an incredibly powerful and originality that it's senseless to compare. They're both masterpieces. But all in all, it's a shame Mick didn't dig playing Dan Brady since this is a very cool movie.
reply
share