silly original post, refuted by many good replies...
along the lines of the post that said the filmmakers were trying to equate the head-shaving with rape, there's the scene after Benton fires Harper because of the haircut, and the 2 bureucrats meet with Benton to defend Harper's behavior. One of them basically says a haircut is no big deal, but Benton states, in effect, that a man can never, ever understand what doing that to a woman actually means to that woman...seems to me she's absolutey equating it with rape. (It's like when Bobby Knight said that if a woman is being raped, and she can't get away from her attacker, she should just lay back and enjoy it...truly one of the stupidest statements ever uttered since the beginning of time! It's something a man can never truly fathom, so his comments and opinions on the subject mean less than zero).
But I also believe the haircut can be taken at face value as well. Again, as one poster stated, it could've been the last straw. But it is also a gesture of dehumanization. After the haircut, Eleanor Parker's character looked not unlike an inmate at Dachau or Auschwitz...which would have been very fresh in the minds of 1950 filmmakers and audiences.
"Love has got to stop some place short of suicide."
reply
share