The last thing in the world we should do is to put any serious thought or feeling into the IMDb Top whatever. Just think about the people you encounter on many of these message boards, the level of literacy is 19th Century Ozarkian. No, wait, people were much more literate in that century, and that would include the people who lived in the Ozarks. So of course they give a lot of awful pictures 10's because they have no sense of proportion and no taste. They would see Red River as a boring old-fashioned black and white movie where no one gets their head cut off, there are no boob shots, and nothing blows up. I don't put much faith in any Top whatever list including the one from AFI. That one is top heavy with baby-boomer and film school picks. People's own favorites are the best because we can each explain why we like them. Films are very personal things, after all. It depends on when we saw them, under what circumstances, with whom we saw them and what was going on in our lives at the time. It's harder to be objective about movies than many people think. I was raised in the film industry; my father was a contract player at MGM during the so-called Golden Years of Hollywood, so I was filled with a good deal of his opinions and those of fellow actors. It has taken me years to sort out what is mine and what was his. I sometimes teach screenwriting at a large San Francisco university and I try to keep from force-feeding my opinions to my students. I encourage them in their own but I do try to get them to explain their picks. So bugger the IMDb or any other Top 100 or 250 movies. They are fun to look at, but they need to be put into perspective.
reply
share
ungerreese
18 years ago
It's all politics. The Duke is the most famous conservitive movie star of all time (Unless you want to count Ronald Reagan). How many times in Triva of Wayne's films is concern over Wayne and his many liberal co-stars getting along or not is mentioned, including Red River?
reply
share