first of all, it's not even in color.
and where's the widescreen, huh?
but more importantly, where's the CGI and 1,206 cuts-per-minute, shaky-cam cool stuff? and believe it or not, the audio is low-fidelity *mono* -- are you kidding me?
where's matt damon or ben affleck in the writing credits? and how come it's not narrated by morgan freeman?
like i said, this movie is absolutely terrible... and it wasn't even post-converted into 3D.
https://sp.yimg.com/ib/th?id=JN.OR7SPVFfrP2aPA51vd3DYQ&pid=15.1&P=0
"Did you make coffee? Make it!"--Cheyenne.
Yea yea, ok, I understand your humor, but no need to preach to the choir. We know that old movies are good.
That said, simply bashing the chi movies and Matt Damon is not right either because they can be very good as well. Not saying I am a Matt Damon fan, because I am not. As in the past, there are many bad movies. Let's not pretend they were all good.
And not one single car blew up like a 500 pound incendiary bomb because it went over a speed bump. Not one!
And they wasted so much time on dialog! I heard Prohibition might be coming back so the gangs can make money again, as if Weed Prohibition weren't already going. OMG I shot an innocent man blah blah blah. All that time wasted being human when they could have been busy blowing away the whole Indian population. Who owns the politicians? Who cares?
Who needs some of the world's best actors, dialog, direction? Just get Sly in there to mumble a few incoherent phrases and blow $#!+ up!