We love lists these days and for my money, Bogart stands atop the list of the greatest movie stars ever. Not the best actors, for there was a lot Bogey could not do. Stage trained before he came to Hollywood, Bogey could handle dialogue just fine, but was not the best at another staple of filmmaking, the reaction shot. When the script said for the camera to move in on Bogey to catch his reacton to something, it was often not the best part of the picture. This is evident in Key Largo in the scene where the sheriff announces he has just killed the Oceloa Brothers, thinking they'd murdered Sawyer. The camera closes in on Bogey and rather than being offended, he looks like he's about to be sick, which I don't think was the intention.
But that, and his inept lovemaking aside, I list him as the movies' greatest star, actually atop Cary Grant, Clark Gable,even Chaplin.
Why Bogey? For me, the criteria is generally what was left behind and Humphrey Bogart appeared in more classic films than just about anyone I can think of.
"Petrified Forest"
"Maltese Falcon"
"Casablanca"
"To Have and Have Not"
"The Big Sleep"
"Key Largo"
"Treasure of Sierra Madrea"
"African Queen"
"The Caine Mutiny."
And these are just the all time classics. The list does not include "High Sierra," "In a Lonely Place," "Sahara," "The Roaring Twenties" and on and on.
Can anyone name an actor who left behind a stronger body of work?
>Why Bogey? For me, the criteria is generally what was left behind and >Humphrey Bogart appeared in more classic films than just about anyone >I can think of. > >Can anyone name an actor who left behind a stronger body of work?
An inarguably stronger body of work?
No.
But an arguably equal or stronger body of work ...... I think there are probably several in that list.
Of course, when you start doing things like listing the "all time classics" that someone appeared you get into a secondary area of opinion as to what all movies count as "all time classics" .... as opposed to just being excellent movies.
I think that in the discussion of "greatest movie star based on cumulative body of work" you have to include such people as:
Cary Grant (Topper; Gunga Din; His Girl Friday; The Philadelphia Story; Bringing Up Baby; Arsenic and Old Lace; Notorious; To Catch a Thief; North by Northwest)
Jimmy Stewart (Mr. Smith Goes to Washington; The Philadelphia Story; It's a Wonderful Life; Harvey; Rear Window; Rope; The Man Who Knew Too Much; Vertigo; The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance)
Henry Fonda (Jezebel; The Grapes of Wrath; The Ox-Bow Incident; Fort Apache; Mister Roberts; The Wrong Man; 12 Angry Men; Fail-Safe; On Golden Pond)
One might not consider some of the movies in these lists to quite be "all time classics" (although I certainly think that the vast majority of them are), but neither are they exhaustive lists of those men's high quality work. (For example, Grant's list does not include such movies as Suspicion, An Affair to Remember, or Operation Petticoat.)
Note that two of these three men's lists benefit from a relatively extensive number of collaborations with Alfred Hitchcock.
Great anlaysis PillowRock. For me it would be impossible to pick a greatest actor. For me Spencer Tracey would be up there and has the film work to back it up. Gregory Peck - perhaps not, but he had great screen presence. Marlon Brando, to me, seemed overrated (especially towards the end of his career).
Today we have Jack Nicholson and (for me) Gary Oldman (who can transform himself so well into a character). Many others will probably spring to mind when I close this response.
Jimmy Cagney. He could do it all--funny, heartbreaking, scary, lovable, song and dance, and an impressive body of work from Public Enemy, Roaring Twenties, Yankee Doodle Dandy, Midsummer Night's Dream, White Heat, One Two Three, etc.
I am new to Humphrey Bogart. I came discovered him through James Cagney movies. So far I like what I have seen. I do have an actor whom I believe can not be touched as far as starring in classic films. JOHN WAYNE You offer... The Petrified Forest ...I offer Stagecoach You offer... Maltese Falcon ...I offer Red River You offer... Casablanca ...I offer The Searchers You offer...To Have and Have Not ...I offer Sands of Iwo Jima You offer...The Big Sleep ...I offer She Wore a Yellow Ribbon You offer...Key Largo ...I offer Fort Apache You offer...Treasure of Sierra Madre ...I offer The Quiet Man You offer...African Queen ...I offer The Man Who Shot Liberty Valanc You offer...Caine Mutiny ...I offer Rio Bravo
Let's go for more... They Were Expendible, Hondo, Long Voyage Home, 3 Godfather, True Grit, Rio Grande, The Comancheros His last film... The Shootist... I can not think of an actor who made a better or more poinent last film. I do not have his numbers in front of me, but if you look it up you will find his name in the Hollywood top ten for over 25 years. If you count for inflation... his movies have grossed more than Bogart. 25 years after his death he is still listed as an all time favorite... He's the only dead guy in the top 10. Go to a Suncoast... look at their catagories... They have a drama section, a horror section, a comedy section and among the many others... a section devoted to John Wayne.
His acting range WAS limited. His politics were sometimes silly. He made more than his share of bad movies... probebly twice as many as Bogart. With all this said... I do believe John Wayne to be the greatest movie star of ALL TIME
As I said in my initial reply in this thread ..... as soon as you mention rating "movie stars" according to how many "classics" they had to their credit you immediately open the can of worms of needing to decide what all counts as a "classic".
What I think that you'll find though is that, across large sample spaces, you'll find less consensus of "classic" status for more of the Wayne films listed than for the Bogart films listed. Some of the Wayne films are certainly "classics". It's just that I think that more of the Bogart films will attain a wide consensus of having that status.
For example, if you go to the American Film Institute web site and go back to their "100 Years, 100 Films" poll and the list of 400 nominees, you'll find that:
Bogey has 7 films among the 400 nominees while Wayne has 5 (not that this is by any means definitive; neither Key Largo on Bogart's side nor The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance on Wayne's side is in that list, and I think that you would find a broad consensus in favor of both films being "classics").
Possibly more to the point, especially in terms of the impression that gets made on people, is what you see in the final top 100 rankings. Wayne has 2 films in that list: Stagecoach at # 63 and The Searchers at #96. By contrast Bogart has 4, all in the top 30: # 2 Casablanca, #17 African Queen, #23 Maltese Falcon, and # 30 Treasue of the Sierra Madre. It's that clustering right near the very top, where basically *everybody* agrees that you are talking about an "all time classic", that makes the big impression on people in favor of Bogart.
For what little it may be worth, the AFI also did a "100 Years, 100 Stars" poll a few years back. They chose a top 50 of each gender. According to their poll (whoever all they asked, I'm not sure who they were, other than having been in the business one way or another) Bogart got their #1 and Wayne got their #13. Again, I do not consider that to be definitive, but it is the collective opinion of one knowledgable and decent sized group.
>You offer... The Petrified Forest ...I offer Stagecoach >You offer... Maltese Falcon ...I offer Red River >You offer... Casablanca ...I offer The Searchers >You offer...To Have and Have Not ...I offer Sands of Iwo Jima >You offer...The Big Sleep ...I offer She Wore a Yellow Ribbon >You offer...Key Largo ...I offer Fort Apache >You offer...Treasure of Sierra Madre ...I offer The Quiet Man >You offer...African Queen ...I offer The Man Who Shot Liberty Valanc >You offer...Caine Mutiny ...I offer Rio Bravo ............ ___________________________________________________________
I think that most people, even if they aren't knowledgable of the filmography of both stars, would recognise more names on Bogie's list than Wayne's. e.g. the Maltese Falcon and Casablanca. All you did is stick in a Wayne film beside each of Bogart's. They are not necessarily as good . While some of them are the best of John Wayne's, some of Humphrey Bogart's are the best ever made (this I can vouch for as I have seen 7 of his 9 mentioned).
Well, you make a reasonable point about John Wayne, and didn't even mention what I think is one of his best roles & best films: "In Harm's Way".
Of course there was the downside: "The High and The Mighty", a bizarre piece of work from Wayne's production company.
But no matter, John Wayne is certainly one of the greatest Hollywood stars of all time. It is not important to proclaim 'the greatest'--it is all a matter of opinion, and will change with the times and as actors come & go.
I am new to Humphrey Bogart. I came discovered him through James Cagney movies. So far I like what I have seen. I do have an actor whom I believe can not be touched as far as starring in classic films. JOHN WAYNE You offer...
You offer...mostly westerns, with a few war films, for Wayne. What if someone doesn't like westerns? That knocks most of Wayne's films completely out of the running for that person. What if that person doesn't think much of war films, either? There go the rest.
Look, Wayne was great at what he did, but if anybody was a great star while not being a very versatile actor, it was Wayne not Bogart.
My vote for best actor of all time goes to Jack Nicholson.
He can be the bad guy( his transformation in The Shining is impressive) as well as the good guy. He can make you smile (As Good as it Gets) and he can make you cry (well I did in One Flew over the Cuckoo's Nest). My point here is that he is the most versatile actor ever. He can handle ANY genre.
This is strong contrast with Humphrey Bogart. I doubt Bogart will ever make me smile. Well he didn't get a lot of chance because "in the old days" the most famous movie stars were all under contract with the big movie companies like Warner. They had little say in what movie they wanted to play in because the company told them: You're staring in this movie next. And that was usually final. This was the case in Casablanca. Paul Henreid didn't even want to be in the movie at first. But in my opinion, Bogart just isn't versatile enough to be called the best actor ever.
And of course now you can argue and say: wait wait, Cary Grant is as versatile as Jack Nocholson if not more. I would have to agree with you on that one but I think Nicholson is more special and energetic as Grant.
To conclude I guess I could say that it's nigh impossible to compare the very old stars like Grant and Bogey with the guys that are still around like Pacino, De Niro and Pacino. These are just different times.
Of course, the only problem is that you're making an argument that has nothing to do with the original post. The orginal poster states up front that they do not mean "best actor", and the Bogart is not the best actor ever ..... being somewhat limited in his range.
However, I will take issue with the statement that "I doubt Bogart will ever make me smile." There are points in many of his best movies where Bogart absolutely cracks me up. Watch The Maltese Falcon and pay attention to the scene where he basically throws a temper tantrum at Gutman, then he leaves the room and as soon as the door is closed he staightens up, relaxes and smiles at his own (Spade's, that is) performance ..... or when he's making snide comments such as "You're not going to go around the room straightening up again, are you?". In Casablanca there's a great moment when Renault has just announced the closing of the bar and the roulette spinner comes up and says "Your winnings, monsieur." and Renault says "Oh, thank you." On first viewing, most people are too focused on those lines to notice Bogart; but his reaction and then approach to his employee behind Renault is the funniest bit in the scene. He also has great funny dialog with Claude Raines' Renault. In both of the aforementioned movies, Bogie's dialog with Sidney Greenstreet is filled with smiles and chuckles for the audience. Of course, for funny banter between Bogart and another character, it's tough to top his chemistry with Lauren Bacall. Key Largo doesn't have many laughs, but both To Have and Have Not and The Big Sleep have plenty of them.
"In Casablanca there's a great moment when Renault has just announced the closing of the bar and the roulette spinner comes up and says "Your winnings, monsieur." and Renault says "Oh, thank you." On first viewing, most people are too focused on those lines to notice Bogart; but his reaction and then approach to his employee behind Renault is the funniest bit in the scene. "
I noticed that too. I laughed my ass off, I swear!
I agree with you on Nicholson. What a great actor he was and still is!
"Bogart. I doubt Bogart will ever make me smile."
I suggest you watch 1941's All Through the NIght. Bogie was absolutely hilarious in this! He had me rolled on the floor laughing. That movie was fun. It would do you more than a smile. If one watches only his serious genre, one would think he has no acting range which is not true.
Funny to see the word 'versatile' come up after someone was praising John Wayne...
I say anyone who doesn't think Bogart was versatile hasn't seen enough of his movies. The Caine Mutiny would be one that I would recommend to such a person--if you haven't seen it, you aren't qualified to judge if he was versatile or not.
When the script said for the camera to move in on Bogey to catch his reacton to something, it was often not the best part of the picture. This is evident in Key Largo in the scene where the sheriff announces he has just killed the Oceloa Brothers, thinking they'd murdered Sawyer. The camera closes in on Bogey and rather than being offended, he looks like he's about to be sick, which I don't think was the intention.
I think that his intent WAS to look sick because on the one hand, he couldn't rat out the mobsters who were the real killers because he'd risk the lot of them ending up with Sawyers fate but on the other hand his sense of justice was eating at him and he was sick with his inability to air the laundry then and there.
reply share
I think that his intent WAS to look sick because on the one hand, he couldn't rat out the mobsters who were the real killers because he'd risk the lot of them ending up with Sawyers fate but on the other hand his sense of justice was eating at him and he was sick with his inability to air the laundry then and there.
Yep. "Nauseated" is precisely the word needed there.
The problem with a Greatest Actors list is that it's limiting. What about non-white actors like Sydney Poiter or Courtney Vance? Foreign actors like Toshiro Mifune or Daniel Auteil, or Hammer stalwarts like Christopher Lee or Peter Cushing? Character actors like Lionel Barrymore or Sydney Greenstreet?
Anyhoo, I think Bogart was a great actor in a few ways that also made him a great star. Regardless of how he felt about an actor offscreen, he was generous in sharing the screen. Some people commented that Robinson dominates this film. That's intentional. Bogart got his biggest break when Leslie Howard insisted he be cast in The Petrified Forest. He seems to have remembered this when he wanted Robinson (whose career had floundered) in Key Largo. Bogart was good at understanding when it was time to take the foreground and when it was time to play the straight man to someone else's scene.
I also think he worked a lot better in tandem with actresses of his day than a lot of contemporary actors. Bogart seemed to appreciate a great actress as a foil and had good chemistry with a lot of his female costars. These things made his films more interesting and therefore his own roles more memorable.
Just picking up on the reaction shot when the sheriff announces he's killed the Osceolas. I can't recall the shot itself, but the whole mood of that scene seemed to convey something akin to guilt and nausea; the captives so wanted to speak but if they did the sheriff would've been killed too.
De Niro must have appeared in as many great films as anyone.
Although I am a huge Bogey fan in reality there is no BEST actor its all down to one's opinion......lots of great actors out there Bogey was certainly one of them.
I'm going to disagree with you only about Bogart's physical acting, particularly his reaction shots. Have you seen Dead End? Bogie's reaction when he finally realizes what Claire Trevor has become is one of the best I've ever seen. Other of his performances, including Casablanca and To Have and Have Not (as examples) are full of brilliant, subtle, understated reaction shots. I guess I think Bogart is even greater than you do! lol
The only problem with Bogie was that, frankly, he didn't live that long, dying at age 57. Who knows what great work he might have had in later years?
Fonda was in his 70's when On Golden Pond was made, Wayne was 69 when he made The Shootist, Cagney retired from films at a relatively young age, then came back with a memorable performance in Ragtime at the age of 82. They considered Grant for James Bond, he was in his early 50's at that time and made his last movie at 62 and could have made more, he lived another 20 years. Even Clark Gable was making films into his last years, with his final picture, The Misfits(also Marilyn Monroe's last) being released after his death in 1960. Bogie made his last film at the age of 56, The Harder They Fall, in which he is clearly dying. But there is no doubt he could have gone on for a long time if his health would have let him.
And tell me how many other actors have their own phrase in the American lexicon, "to Bogart", to borrow something with no intention of giving it or paying it back. Bogie "bogarted" cigarettes in every movie he ever made.
With apologies to Spencer Tracy, Claude Rains, Kirk Douglass, Montgomery Clift, et al or some of today's biggies, DeNiro, Nicholson(my favorite contempory actor), Eastwood, Hanks or Pacino, I believe the list of best actors ever begins and ends with those above, Cagney, Fonda, Wayne, Grant, Gable and, of course, Humphrey Bogart. I can't put one above the rest, so I'll chicken out and say they are tied for number one.
I'm going to disagree with you a little bit here. I think that Wayne and Gable played the same character in most of their movies, only occasionally stepping out of personna to really act. The same criticism can be leveled at Eastwood. I also think you're vastly undervaluing Spencer Tracy, he's one of the best to ever appear before a camera, and belongs right up there with Bogart, Fonda and Cagney. Your list also omits Marlon Brando, as powerful an actor as has ever been filmed, and Dustin Hoffman, who too often is left off lists such as this. To me, he belongs right up there with contemporaries like Nicholson, DeNiro and Pacino.
Oh, and Bogart has entered modern vocabulary in another way. Many younger people refer to cigarettes as "bogies." They don't even know where that slang term comes from, but they use it!
Several here have made the misstatement that Bogart does not react well or correctly in scenes. Well you could not be more wrong. Just off the top of my head I offer up the scene in Casablanca where Rick goes up to Sam to protest that he is playing "As Time Goes By" and sees Ilsa sitting at the table. Man the look of hate on his face is chilling to say the least. In The Desperate Hours when Mr. Hilliard (played by Frederic March) tells Glenn Griffin that his younger brother has been gunned down by the cops his reaction is right on cue as is his reaction when he hears his his cop nemesis' voice over the PA system and when Hilliard throws Griffin out of his house at the end of the movie. Bogie in The Caine Mutiny is another flick where he shines as well! And The Treasure of the Sierra Madre is another Bogie classic where his talents are at the forefront!
He's a bit younger than the Bogart-Robinson-Cagney-Fonda-Tracy group, but I think you HAVE to include Paul Newman in terms of body of work and skill as an actor.