MovieChat Forums > Fort Apache (1948) Discussion > the ambiguous Clues to the Fictional Dat...

the ambiguous Clues to the Fictional Date


"United States Army" can mean AMY army of the several armies the United States had and has, such as the United States Volunteers in the Civil war. But it can also mean the regular army, the standing professional army, which is referred to as The United States Army. Thus a general in the United States Volunteers could have the initial USV after his title and a general in the regular army could have USA after his title to distinguish regular army generals from volunteer generals and distinguish both from militia generals.

O'Rourke was in the 69th New York Volunteers and also in whatever fictional regiment of regular army cavalry was in the movie. That leaves his statement that he was in the US Army for fifteen years ambiguous. He could have meant he was in the regular army for eleven years and in the volunteers for four years for a combined total of fifteen years and possibly served in a foreign army.

Or he could have meant that he served in the regular army, one possible definition of "the United States Army" for fifteen years, and in the volunteers for four years, making a total of nineteen years in US service, and was possibly in some foreign army earlier. Being old enough to have a son old enough to graduate from West Point (and thus usually twenty two) means that O'Rourke senior should have been an adult capable of being a soldier for some years longer than fifteen or nineteen years.

I'm not sure the creators of the film knew enough to appreciate the ambiguity of O'Rourke's statement.

If Fort Apache happens during the Civil War of 1861-1865 almost all of O'Rourke senior's regular army service would have been before the Civil war. If Fort Apache is set any time after 1876 all of O'Rourke senior's service in the regular army would be after the Civil War. If Fort Apache is set between 1865 and 1876 some of O'Rourke senior's service in the regular army would be before the Civil War and some of it would be after the Rebellion.

The break between the Collingwoods and the Thursdays could have happened in the Mexican war 1846-48 or in the Civil War 1861-65. 19 year old Philadelphia Thursday was already born when the break up happened but too young to remember Mrs. Collingwood. If the break between Collingwood and Thursday was fifteen to seventeen years before, the movie could be about 1861-1865 or 1876-1882.

The dress uniforms seen at dance indicates the movie is before new dress uniforms were adopted in 1873. The rifles used by the Apaches indicates the movie should be in the 1880s when many Apaches had repeating rifles.

The last year when the hostile leaders Cochise, Geronimo, Satanta, and Alchesay were all alive, free, and hostile to the United States was in 1869. In that year the White Mountain Apaches made peace and Alchesay went on to be sergeant of Indian Scouts and earn the Medal of Honor. Thus some may suppose that the film opens on Washington's Birthday in 1869 and the battle is a few months later.

I trust this shows that we don't know when when Fort Apache fictionally happens.

reply

Seemed to be Post Civil War by banter.



Can you fly this plane?
Surely u cant be serious
I am serious,and dont call me Shirley

reply

The epilogue to Fort Apache (1948) happens several years after the main action, since Lt. O'Rourke and Philadelphia Thursday have married and have at least one child, Michael Thursday York O'Rourke, who looks like he is a few years old. And York has been promoted at least one step.

If there are any shots of York in the epilogue clear enough to show his shoulder strap insignia, two leaves on each shoulder strap would make him a major or a lieutenant colonel, while one eagle on each shoulder strap would make him a colonel. York is addressed as "colonel" in the epilogue, so viewers should look for two items or one item in a shoulder strap to tell his rank. Anyway, years must have passed between the main action in Fort Apache and the epilogue.

So if York and Yorke are the same character, Lieutenant Colonel Yorke in Rio Grande (1950) should look older than Captain York in Fort Apache (1948). But then the question would be whether York in the epilogue to Fort Apache (1948) looks older than Yorke in Rio Grande (1950) and what their ranks are. We can hope that the one who looks older will have same rank or higher rank than the one who looks younger.

The ranks and apparent ages of York in the epilogue of Fort Apache and Yorke in Rio Grande should determine which comes first, the epilogue of Fort Apache or Rio Grande. Since Rio Grande should happen in 1879 or 1880, if the epilogue of Fort Apache could happen a few years later that would put it in the 1880s, and the main action of Fort Apache could be in the early or middle 1870s. But if the epilogue of Fort Apache happens before Rio Grande it could happen in the mid 1870s and the main action could happen in the early 1870s or late 1860s.

But if York and Yorke are two different characters comparing their apparent ages gives no clue to the fictional date of Fort Apache.

reply

Post civil war . Thursday, Yorke and O'Rourke had all been higher ranking officers during it.

reply