The direction, yes, from minute to minute, blows my mind. Hitchcock's manifold deployment of technique might be unmatched. Each scene promises new glimpses into this director's understanding of cinema. And in addition, he gets fine performances from his actors. Quite unlike anybody else.
But, for me, nothing about this film is close to perfect.
My rating: 8
After watching this, The Lady Vanishes and Vertigo (which I do consider a masterpiece), I can't help but wonder how Hitchcock viewed himself during these earlier (30's and 40's) periods of his career. Did he consider himself an artist? Or merely a highly skilled craftsman? I ask because while Notorious overflows with the highest pedigree of filmmaking, frequently weak plot points tarnish the whole for me. Take Alicia's diminutive note of sadness after learning of her father's death. The paucity of depth supplied by Hitchcock in relating this seismic event leads me to believe he had no illusions about his creation: An entertaining thriller.
I also find the film's score interesting. Hitcock uses the swelling music sparingly, which I am thankful for because these early film scores sicken me, but at the same time I can't help but wonder how Hitchcock feels about the music? It's as though he cues the music to cue the romance, and then goes a step further by having his actors utter sly lines while the syrup plays (likely misquoted):
"Why do you like the song?"
"Because it's a love song, and love songs are always silly."
He's laughing at his film's bad taste, right?
reply
share