MovieChat Forums > Notorious (1946) Discussion > Bad acting by Cary Grant

Bad acting by Cary Grant


Cary Grant just seemed to read his lines off cue cards or something. His facial reaction and gestures are the same throughout the entire movie. He doesn't look in love with Alicia. He is just a handsome man, that's all he was hired for. He didn't make his character Devlin anything rememberable or anything. Anybody could have played that role. At least Bergman tried to act, Grant just showed up to work and read his lines. This movie is over-rated. Grant's performance was weak. Bergman and Grant had no on-screen chemistry in this film.

If CTU would let Jack Bauer do his job, the show would be called 12.

reply

I'm going to have to agree with you. Cary Grant just looks bored all the way through, and not in the cool "don't give anything away" sense.

Ingrid Bergman was much better, but it seems like her passion isn't returned in the scenes with Grant. The real acting heroes in this film were supporting players Claude Rains and Madame Konstantin. This is decent entertainment, but as far as Hitchcock goes, this is solidly in the middle in my book.

reply

Jeeze. Grant is superb and the relationship between him and Bergman--which is the real subject of the film, not the Nazi McGuffin--is fascinating.

reply

Grant isn't bad, but he's playing a really unlikeable character who lets his jealousy get in the way of his spying, even to the point of endangering Alicia with his caddish remarks about her lack of virtue. She's suppose to go back to the house of Hitler with his kind of pep talks?

But Grant does better with his role than it deserves, thanks mainly to his fabulous chemistry with Bergman, which gets across a sense of affection the lines seem to blunder past. Weak link, yes; bad acting, no.

reply

It's called 'nuance'. Dev can't look at her in most of the scenes and he's cruel to her because his heart is breaking. He hides his pain behind a cold exterior.

They're both putting their duty ahead of themselves, and it's honorable, but it also almost destroys them. It's the ironic touches of both the story and the performances that make this a great film.

I'm afraid modern audiences are so used to being hit over the head that they don't recognize really 'good' acting anymore. If it's not in-your-face, they can't see it. Sad, because the really good stuff is often under the surface.

reply



It's called 'nuance'. Dev can't look at her in most of the scenes and he's cruel to her because his heart is breaking. He hides his pain behind a cold exterior.

They're both putting their duty ahead of themselves, and it's honorable, but it also almost destroys them. It's the ironic touches of both the story and the performances that make this a great film.

I'm afraid modern audiences are so used to being hit over the head that they don't recognize really 'good' acting anymore. If it's not in-your-face, they can't see it. Sad, because the really good stuff is often under the surface.




I completely agree with you!

reply

You are so right.

reply

I disagree. Cary Grant is playing the role as it is in the script and as Hitchcock directed him. His character is a "handler" for the spy, Ingrid Bergman, and it's his job to get the best results from her. To achieve that, his character must manipulate Bergman by pretending not to love her, so she'll be more realistic in her spy's role as Claude Rains's wife. Love her? Of course Grant loves her. But he can't tell her that until the end, when her role as a spy is over.

Difficult assignment, playing the role of a character playing a role.

reply

I thought his performance was great. He's supposed to be cold and unemotional and sometimes downright heartless to Alicia. It's a subversion of the typical Cary Grant role - the charmer. He's not charming at all. He's good but not nice. And, it's a contrast with Sebastian, who's a nice guy but a villain. Plus, as part of being not a nice guy, he's in love with her, but fighting it because he doesn't approve of her. Of course he doesn't act like he's in love with her when he's around her. He's not supposed to. He's fighting it every inch of the way. Not just there to be handsome but be a jerk around her. But, he does show he's in love with her in other scenes. When he first hears about her assignment and starts protesting. And in the scene where he tells his bosses that Alicia is definitely not a lady - but that she's someone who's risking her life which is something their wives wouldn't do. One of the best moments of acting from him in the film is after Alicia says Sebastian is one of her playmates now. Devlin's entire demeanor changes. There's no big display of emotion of expression (again, that minimalist approach is what the role called for) but it's clear he's seething with jealousy -and he takes it out on her by being hateful.

I would say this performance is memorable, because it shows that he can play something other than his typical role. And it's a role that's designed to be under appreciated, because he's sort of the straight man, stoic type, which is seen as not acting especially in contrast to the more personable characters. Plus, for most of the film he's not the least bit likable. Which is really impressive, considering he's Cary Grant.

Life: An STD with 100% mortality rate
I Gave Up Trying to Find Intelligence on IMDB

reply

I agree with OP. Cary Grant is much better in comedies or playboy roles like his characters in Suspicion and North by Northwest. I don't think his acting here is nuanced - it's just flat, and his character was boring. I think.



reply

How can you say that? He is ice cold here, and really bad, but not in an over-dramatic way. I like him in this, although he's been better in other films.

"Of course it's me, who were you expecting?"

reply

But, what people don't seem to get is Cary Grant is supposed to be ice cold for most of the movie. I'm afraid I can't give the character the credit that some of the other supporters do -it's not just the job forcing him to be cold and sometimes hateful. That's also part of who he is. T.R. Devlin is one of the most unlikable characters Cary Grant ever played. If he had been warm and friendly and personable, that would have been bad acting in this movie. If you're playing someone who is unemotional (or rather keeps his emotions hidden) then it would be bad acting to play it any other way. He's not playing charmer Johnnie Aysgarth (Suspicion). He's playing a cold, often heartless, SOB - who just happens to be the good guy.

Now, if people want to talk about how he portrayed that coldness is one thing. To say he did a bad job acting as a cold unemotional person (even though I disagree) is something. But, to say it was a bad job simply because of the fact of his coldness just doesn't make sense, when it's exactly what the part called for.

Life: An STD with 100% mortality rate
I Gave Up Trying to Find Intelligence on IMDB

reply

Oh, I need to update my post- I meant his character is really bad, even though he's meant to be good. I think Grant portrayed that excellently- you could tell he wasn't being flat, he was definitely putting effort into it, but he wasn't overdramatic or anything.

"Of course it's me, who were you expecting?"

reply

My opinion is that Devlin's coldness is too emphasized throughout the film. It's overstated and lacks subtlety. But I'm guessing that's what Hitchcock wanted so he would be to blame for this. (Obviously I'm not in the camp that thinks Hitch was near-godlike, incapable of making mistakes.)

reply

In the office with the other government guys, one of them refers to her as something like "THAT kind of woman" and you can see Dev's head's going to explode. I think it's the sexiest thing in the movie (except the end when he rescues her) when he defends her. You can just see him seething at the remarks they made about her. You can see how much he loves her.

reply

Bravo Angela-35! Gary Grant's acting here was spot on for Devlin. Grant could be charming, urbane, sophisticated, serious, funny, and downright goofy in the many characters he's played; one of the most underrated actors of his time IMO.

reply

^This


Give to Causes For Free: http://theanimalrescuesite.com

reply

One of the best moments of acting from him in the film is after Alicia says Sebastian is one of her playmates now. Devlin's entire demeanor changes. There's no big display of emotion of expression (again, that minimalist approach is what the role called for) but it's clear he's seething with jealousy -and he takes it out on her by being hateful.


I agree with this completely. His acting is superb in this scene, and throughout the movie in general.

reply

I will have to vehemently disagree with you there. Grant is actually superb in this role, for the reasons you state--he is completely unmoved by almost anything, which is because his character is fighting between doing his job and his love for Alicia. But Devlin is so cool and collected, he can't let that show, so he needs to overcompensate.

Grant's performance is in fact one of the great understated performances in any film. He lets subtle things--such as the way he moves his eyes or the way he tilts his head--convey more than words could ever do. Indeed, Premiere magazine rated it one of the best of all time. And he and Bergman actually have an extremely erotic chemistry together in this film, and that's because it is indeed so subtle. Less is definitely more.

reply

Exactly.

Grant's performance in Notorious is one of my favourite male performances of all time. His restraint is so bloody compelling! The combination of that restraint and his electric chemistry with Ingrid Bergman is enough to drive a person crazy (in a good way)! I've seen Notorious many times and he only gets more compelling with each viewing.

I'm not always the biggest fan of subtlety in performances because there are very few situations in which it really works. However, in Notorious, it really works for Grant. It's too bad he didn't get more opportunities to do that kind of work because he was marvelous at it. In fact, the only other high-profile role I can think of in which he got to do a similar thing was in The Philadelphia Story (another wonderful performance from him).

(Eric Clapton on Jimi Hendrix) "He just plays blues things and he freaks out occasionally."

reply

Please, Cary Grant was never a great actor. He's just given the benefit of the doubt by those who worship all from the "Golden Era" of Hollywood. He played Cary Grant (as usual) but played it more flat (in line with the "role"), which is why it looked so rubbish.


Bergman was great (as usual). I disagree with you about the overall result of the movie; I thought it was great.

reply

Some of these posts are unbelievable...but then why even care what one anonymous IMDB poster thinks when he/she thinks completely opposite to decades of film fans and critics...Grant was superb in this film which is one of the greatest ever made.

reply

Please, Cary Grant was never a great actor. He's just given the benefit of the doubt by those who worship all from the "Golden Era" of Hollywood. He played Cary Grant (as usual) but played it more flat (in line with the "role"), which is why it looked so rubbish.


He is far better actor that people usually think and easily better than most his contemporary "movie stars".

He is great here. Not so great in Suspicion.

Might have been at his best in Only Angels Have Wings out of those that I've seen, not counting comedy performances.

reply

Next time you see this, watch Cary Grant's EYES. He is showing his emotions through them....watch when they sparkle and when he blinks - very intent and focused - and how black the pupils get when he's upset about what's happening. Don't forget the scene at the top of the hill.... He looks away from her until he can't hold back.

reply

That's how Hitchcock directed him. The focus was to stay on Bergman. You have heard of directing?

reply

Agree with the OP. If Grant's wooden acting was on purpose to show that he could manage his private life and business, then it should all have fallen away in the movie's finale when he came clear and declared his love to Alicia. But it was the same stiff acting as before. It let me to believe he didn't love her after all and just wanted her attention to stay awake.

__________
Last movie watched: Notorious (7/10)

reply