Why was the plot so unbelievably overcomplicated . What was the point of having so many interlocking and overlapping characters ? This was a tale which could have been told much easier without all the total screen confusion .
Well, to be honest, you're missing the point of the movie and the, even better, novel by Raymond Chandler. Chandler was not Agatha Christie, and plot was probably the least important element of his novels. The pleasures of Chandler are in character, dialogue, and atmosphere. The film is a surprisingly faithful adaptation of the novel both in style and plot; except for a major enlargement of Lauren Bacall's character, and a bit of juggling with the actual ending, the two are quite similar. The thing is that the novel (Chandler's first and he stitched together elements from two or three earlier short stories, which exacerbates its complexity) is also pretty confusing on a first read. Since the movie was obliged by the Production Code to omit the motivations for several of the murders (a pornography racket and a gay relationship) it is even more difficult to follow. You might not like this sort of thing, which is fair enough.
Oh, and the girl in the bookshop is Dorothy Malone. It's a great scene and quite well known by film buffs.
reply
share