Has anyone read the book?


if you have, can you give me a summary of what its about please?

If quizzes are quizzical, what are tests?

reply

Although I've never seen the movie, the book was excellent. It was the coming of age story through Francie Nolan's perspective. It told of the difficulty living in Brookland during the early 1900s-1920s.
It begins with a quick summary of how Katie and Johnny met and then, once Francie is born, she takes over the story.
The books tells of Katie's love, which is divided between the three people in her family. She favors Neely (Francie's brother), then Johnny, after him it's Francie. Thus, Katie is hardest on Francie.
As Francie grows, she comes into her own by developing a mind of her own. The struggle of poverty still remains, however by the end of the book, Francie, Katie and Neely manage to overcome it. (The author killed off Johnny towards the beginning of the book, so needless to say, not much was said about him.)
I recommend this book to any girl/woman. It will make you cry and laugh.

reply

I've been reading this book for a week, I'm on chapter 47. It's so good I haven't been able to put it down.

Laugh often Live simply Love much

reply

I'm currently reading & thoroughly enjoying the novel. Needless to say, it contains much more detail about the characters than the film, which is a favorite of mine. This passage wonderfully describes Katie and her sisters:
"Those were the Rommely women: Mary the mother, Evy, Sissy and Katie her daughters and Francie, who would grow up to be a Rommely woman even though her name was Nolan. They were all slender, frail creatures with wondering eyes and fluttery voices.

But they were made out of thin invisible steel."

The Nolans were much poorer than my impression from the movie, subsisting largely on stale bread bought for pennies.

I'm reading my grandmother's copy which I recently discovered in my bookcase.

Dale

reply

Periodically I try to get the book from the Brooklyn Library and it's never on the shelves. Always out with either interested readers or class assignments. I'll break down soon and get a copy from Amazon.

I'm particularly interested because I live in Williamsburg, the Brooklyn neighborhood where it's set (that's the Williamsburg Bridge at the end of the opening credits) and I've read that Betty Smith describes Williamsburg so carefully in the book, using local landmarks, that Brooklyn readers could easily follow Francie's wanderings through the neighborhood. I am looking forward to reading it very much.

reply

I just finished this book yesterday (but have never seen the movie). It is so wonderful! Everyone should read this book. If you must have a summary rather than read for yourself, Sparknotes has excellent summaries and there is a very short one on wikipedia that is decent.

reply

This is my favorite book of all time.

Every time I taste peppermint I think of that one part where she has her cracked peppermint candy and ice water and book and tree.

reply

The movie was excellent, but it was nowhere as good as the book. There was a personality about the book that the movie was unable to capture. If you haven't read the book, do yourself a favor and read it.

reply

I'd say that the film is very much in the spirit of the book, but the book has a lot more detail. It's an obvious autobiography and honest in its grimness and gayety. You get to find out what happened to Francie, Neely and Annie after their mom married Mr. McShane.

I'm all right, I'm alllll right!

reply

Flat out this is the best book ive ever read, and the best movie i have ever seen. I love both so much. I was glad to see it on TCM yesterday. I taped it and will watch it again.

reply

This book was required reading in my freshman English class in 1987. I have read at at least once a year since then. I have watched the movie a few times.The movie is really good but it stops long before the book ends. When you are reading the book it takes you along with Francie and her hardships, you see things through her eyes. I flinch when her cheek gets pinched for the penny the junk man gives her and my heart breaks when the pinch is no longer on the cheek on her face. I suggest this book to anyone, not just girls and women. Betty Smith wrote another simalarly styled book called Maggie-Now, I highly suggest any one that love "Tree" read that also.

reply

Yes, I've read it several times, and even recently purchased an unabridged audiobook of it on CD. It's a very rich coming-of-age story, with lots of flavor of the early 1900's. Parts of it are sad, ugly and brutal, but the family's struggle for survival manages to remain optimistic. I was just fascinated by it as a teenager and even now find myself referring to parts of it in conversations with friends.

reply

I only recently found my late grandmother's hardback copy(1944) buried in my book shelf and am very eager to read it. The movie is one of my favorites.

Dale

reply

I LOVE the book and will buy the DVD at some point. I never want to be out of touch with this wonderful film. I understand the need NOT to take Francie as far as in the book, but I do miss the Neely/Francie relationship as described in the book.

Dale

reply

Why not read it yourself, you won't be sorry it's a great book.

Siri

Don't Make Me Have to Release the Flying Monkeys!


reply

It's a very good book. I read it last month for the first time. My folks were from New York City, only a couple of decades more recent than the book so they took the book and the story to heart, but it was antique to them. If you understand the times it makes the book, which is excellent in itself, even more interesting. The period of the book is pre-war (WORLD WAR I!) Williamsburg, a section of Brooklyn in an era of intense fresh immigration to the area, the first people to get their feet on the ground in America, so to speak, and their kids who are first generation Americans for the most part. They came with nothing, they are hard-scrabbling for an existence, and taking a lot of pains, and even a lot of joy, from the experience. The book is frank about money and sex, although the sex was soft-pedaled by our standards. The other period to consider is the mid to late 30's when the book was actually written, marketed, and published. It was the Roosevelt era of the "New Deal" and there are attitudes in the book that are derived from the 30's much more than the teens.

It was a notable book for the frankness, for the subject matter (few if any heroes of the time were common people) and for being written by - a woman! Betsy Smith became a celebrity of the time. The book was printed in a 'combat edition' and sent to the troops in large numbers. Think of dogfaces in foxholes whiling away their downtime by reading about a young girl's predicament in New York City. The movie came right after the war, and a successful Broadway musical not long after that.

reply

Just finished it yesterday. What an experience. I was utterly flattened by the intense poignancy of emotion that was reached in the final pages. Betty Smith perfectly balanced the positives and negatives throughout the book without making the narrative seem too choppy or overly episodic. The dialogue and events tend to be somewhat more hard-boiled, rough and unrefined than in the film - readers beware.

Although, as mentioned, the ending's fierce emotionality laid me waste, as I'm sure it was meant to, I still would humbly suggest a slight alteration (please, no flames if you disagree):

SPOILERS

SPOILERS

Francie is packing up to go to college in Michigan. It is her final Saturday - her final day - in her old familiar flat, in her neighborhood, in Brooklyn. She knows that very shortly there will be no neighborhood to return to, because when the war ends, the City plans to demolish the neighborhood and replace it with more modern housing.

Francie looks out her window and sees a little neighbor girl across the way sitting on the fire escape, just as Francie used to do so often, watching "the big girls" dressing up for their dates. Francie just now is dressing for her own date, and she sees the little girl watching her, just as Francie had watched "the big girls" so many years ago.

Francie yells across to the little neighbor girl, jokingly calling her "Francie," because of the resemblance to Francie's younger self. The little girl corrects Francie, shouting back her real name. Francie then shuts her window, murmuring to the little girl, "Goodbye, Francie." This is, among other things, a moment of supreme heartbreak: Francie is saying goodbye to her old self, and she knows that she has left her childhood behind just as surely as she is leaving the little neighbor girl, her home and neighborhood behind.

I am tempted to want to mitigate the heartbreak of this scene because it is the YOUNG Francie that we have known and loved through four-fifths of the novel. It is the CHILD and ADOLESCENT Francie who provides most of the narrative. Therefore ending the story JUST on the note of the Adult Francie saying goodbye to the Child Francie conveys an unnecessary sadness, especially at the moment of Francie's and her family's triumph. To me, it seems a bit callous for Francie to simply turn away that younger self who has sustained and nourished the narrative - and who most readers have by the novel's end, come to love, admire and want to protect. Yes, she is saying goodbye to her childhood and to her young self, but there is a finality in this goodbye that I find overly sad.

Therefore I tend to imagine a slight addition to the ending as written, namely: Francie notices the little girl, and acknowledges that the girl is a symbol of Francie's own youth. Then Francie whispers "Goodbye, Francie" to the little girl and she closes the window. Francie, as we know, has been sprucing up for a date. She turns to the mirror, where she sees the "new," adult Francie. A slow small smile curves her lips, and she whispers, "Hello, Francie."

Acknowledging and greeting her new self, just after acknowledging and saying goodbye to her old self, would round out the emotional tone of the final scene. "Both" Francies would have achieved a bond and a link, and the narrative assures the reader that Francie, though "new", is still "our" Francie and is carried in her heart.

Again, you're welcome to disagree, but please - no flames. There's no improving perfection, and most readers view the novel to be near-perfect. I intrude my changes only out of my own love for Francie and her home, and am simply saying that I would have enjoyed a less definitive and abrupt farewell to the young Francie and her old neighborhood.

reply

I finished this book today and immediately started crying. I am not exactly sure why, but I think the ending was so beautiful, and also because I was sad it was over. Amazing book.

reply

It is indeed a great book. Always reminds me of how dangerous it was/is to be a woman or girl in poverty...

reply

I like your imaginative alternate ending.

I don't think I want to go to the pictures. Oh?Why not? I've seen everything worth seeing.

reply

Thanks much, just1Hitch :)

reply

It's one of the best books I've ever read!

reply

I have read the book and can confirm it is brilliant. Lot's in it that couldn't make it into the film, loads more back story about Jonny and Katie and theres a whole 1/4 of it that happens after the film has ended!

reply

Betty Smith did an amazing job.She wrote with so much detail but it it enriched and layred the character.The detail never drags the story as it's told.

Sissy is a far more colorful character in the book than in the movie.As much as I liked Sissy in the movie adore her in the book.

Katie is also better rounded out.Her outlook is beter explained and therefore better understood.Yet it doesn't let her off the hook either.She and Francie still have a that tension between them but it's more like it comes and goes in the book.

It's worth reading no question.

reply


I have a first edition of the book and have read it many times. I also have listened to the audio version of the book. I also, have the biography of Betty Smith. I put this book right up there with "To Kill a Mockingbird." The film is excellent, although dated. It was one of Elia Kazan's first movies as director. Although I absolultely love the movie, I wish they would do a remake using new technology. I think they haven't put it out in DVD because the quality is so poor. Still, in all, it is one of my favorite movies.

reply