MovieChat Forums > The Lost Weekend Discussion > Jane Wyman's Character --- Enabler

Jane Wyman's Character --- Enabler


I know that we are supposed to see Helen St James as loyal and loving and good, but frankly, she gives me the creeps.

In the film, three years had elapsed since Helen learned that Don was a drunk. No woman in her right mind would give three years of her life to a penniless drunk. Her constant babying of him, the excuses she always makes for him, the refusal to make any demands of him... And that creepy speech she make when she learned of his alcoholism. She bragged of her strength and determination, as if she could will Don to sobriety. He is her construction project, a shining reflection of her goodness.

Dedicating your life to trying to change someone is a fool's enterprise. Beneath its seeming humility is an incredibly arrogant assumption about your power to influence others. Even if Don sobered up for good, he will view her as a medicine. Something that was helpful when he was sick. You stop taking medicine when you are well. He will feel guilt/pity about it but he will demand a fresh start in a relationship with a woman who won't baby him and whose willingness to make demands of him he will respect.

reply

That's a rather cynical and pessimistic interpretation of Wyman's character

"That was refreshing. I'm refreshed. I'm refreshing."

-The Weather Man (2005)

reply

What kind of understanding of the nature of alcoholism was Helen supposed to have?






It's an interesting psychological phenomenon.

reply

After three years it should become clear to you that this is not YOUR problem and you can't fix it.

Since the dawn of time women have selected men who could bring home the bacon. Since the dawn of time women have chosen men for their strength, not their helplessness.

reply

Many women have done exactly what Wyman's character did and for alot longer than 3 years. If you don't believe me, than I suggest you attend some AA meetings and find out the truth for yourself.

reply

A drunkard's dream, if I ever did see one...

reply

Very true my friend.

reply

Then that makes her an enabler, doesn't it ?

reply

Yes Tarasicodissa - Good observation.

reply

[deleted]

Hang in there, Friend....

reply

Yeah, hang in there. No matter how many times you stumble never lose faith in your ability to get up and try again. I seem to be blessed with a non-addictive personality and I consider it just that, a blessing. I lucked out. I don't believe that I have more character than you, I believe that you have an affliction that I don't suffer from. Believe in yourself.

reply

[deleted]

I totally agree with you. In fact, I don't think that her character was unrealistic or unbelievable, but I dislike the fact that she was portrayed as a "heroine," and that the film honored her for her loyalty, support, and understanding, but failed to acknowledge that her enabling (along with Don's brother -- who's even worse) contributing significantly to his deterioration.

Having said that, it was still a great movie. And, Ray Milland looks a little bit like David Lynch, especially the hair.

reply

Very well disected Tarasicodissa. She is very naive; even stupid. Also, I refuse to buy into the "this was made in 1945" justifications either - people are not more or less intelligent now as opposed to then.

My vote history: http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=29746361

reply