But the point is, hallucinations do look real to the people having them. If we as a movie audience are seeing a hallucination that a character is supposed to be scared by, it's not going to be scary to us if it looks fake, and I'm sorry but that bat looks totally fake when it first appears - it's particularly noticeable because the mouse is so obviously real (in fact for me the first appearance of the mouse crawling out of the apartment wall is the creepiest part of the scene, because it's unexpected and does look real).
yeah, the initial sighting of the bat in the window is particularly awful. it looks like, and may well be, someone holding a cardboard tube with two flaps on it on the end of a stick. because of the obvious contrast with the (real) mouse your initial reaction is that it's SUPPOSED to be fake. which obviously doesnt make sense, and throws you off.
i can understand why they would have had to use a fake bat for it actually devouring (or whatever) the mouse, but for the earlier shots surely they could have got the central park zoo to loan them a bat for a few hours?
the scene still works very well, but it's an annoying misstep.
reply
share