Other people would be better served just suggesting someone watch a film without to much glowing praise. I agree that great expectations ruin many a film.
Personally I liked the film a lot but then again it was one of those childhood early teen experiences when sneaking downstairs to watch the late movie with a sibling and having no expectations. it just snuck up on me and left an indelible impression.
Seeing it again now some 20 or more years later it seems more a vignette of old Alfred hitchcock presents episodes or Twilight Zone episodes.
In regard to historical context, its easy to see how if one acculturates to more modern thriller or horror films that you may not find an older film as scary/ thrilling/ original, as one may have seen the archetype of story remade since then. As an example, Agatha Christie's famous novel And Then There Were None (book not movie) has been redone in one form or another on TV shows. Criminal Minds had an extremely well done episode (Joe Montegna returns to Long Island to investigate multiple murders) using the same plot construct as Agatha Christie. The ventriloquist vignette was also covered somewhat in a Twilight Zone episode with Cliff Robertson as the ventriloquist. So, if one sees Twilight Zone or Criminal Minds episodes before seeing the Dead Of Night and reading Agatha Christie they may say, "not so startling" or innovative.
Still find this movie to be top notch.
reply
share