MovieChat Forums > To Have and Have Not (1945) Discussion > Dialog Similarities with 'Only Angels Ha...

Dialog Similarities with 'Only Angels Have Wings' (1939)


I was watching "Only Angels Have Wings" (1939) the other day, and a couple of bits of dialog caught my attention, because I had heard them before in "To Have and Have Not" (1944); one of my all-time favorite movies.

I don't know if this was part of Faulkner's script, the actors improvising, or on-the-set last-minute rewrites, but I thought it was pretty cool. I'm pretty sure this was the result of a tip-of-the-hat, or a tribute, to the previous movie, "Only Angels Have Wings."

Has anybody else noticed dialog similarities in, "To Have and Have Not," with a previous movie?

This dialog was exact:

OAHW:
Bonnie Lee: I'm hard to get, Geoff. All you have to do is ask me.

THAHN:
Slim: I'm hard to get, Steve. All you have to do is ask me.

And this dialog was pretty close:

OAHW:
Bonnie Lee: What was she like, anyway?
Geoff Carter: Who?
Bonnie Lee: That girl that made you act the way you do.
Geoff Carter: A whole lot like you. Just as nice, almost as smart.
Bonnie Lee: Chorus girl?
Geoff Carter: Only by temperament.

THAHN:
Slim: Who was the girl, Steve?
Steve: Who was what girl?
Slim: The one who left you with such a high opinion of women.

reply

Hawks would sometimes use certain scenes or similar dialog from his previous movies and use them in others. I've noticed this about To Have and Have Not. In Man's Favorite Sport, Hawks re-used the torn dress sequence in this film from Bringing Up Baby. I'm pretty sure Hawks also re-used past sequences or dialog in Rio Bravo.

"Dry your eyes baby, it's out of character."

reply

That makes sense. Thanks!

I'll keep this in mind when I watch movies by Howard Hawks from now on, and see if I can spot other instances of this.

Thanks Again,

--Pap

reply

I don't know if this was part of Faulkner's script, the actors improvising, or on-the-set last-minute rewrites, but I thought it was pretty cool. I'm pretty sure this was the result of a tip-of-the-hat, or a tribute, to the previous movie, "Only Angels Have Wings."

Hawks in his career loved re-using themes and motifs all across his films and To Have and Have Not and the later Rio Bravo form a loose trilogy with Only Angels Have Wings in that it's about a small group of men and what happens to it when a woman comes into it, in each case the results are different. The character played by Bogart is kind of like a relative to Cary Grant's Jeff Carter and both of them are probably descendants of John Wayne in Rio Bravo.

The sub-plot of Dolores Moran and her husband needing help from Harry and gang is also a repeat of a similar sub-plot in OAHW where Rita Hayworth and Richard Barthelmess come in all-of-a-sudden into their lives. In the initial draft, Dolores Moran was supposed to be an ex of Bogart's but that was rejected when people saw how well the chemistry worked between Bogart and Bacall.

More than Casablanca, To Have and Have Not is a re-working of Only Angels Have Wings from which Casablanca also seems to have stolen a few things from.


"Ça va by me, madame...Ça va by me!" - The Red Shoes

reply

"In the initial draft, Dolores Moran was supposed to be an ex of Bogart's but that was rejected when people saw how well the chemistry worked between Bogart and Bacall."

I'm glad they changed it. That would have been too similar to OAHW(I love both OAHW and THAHN).

Here's a funny clip called "The Howard Hawks Woman" which shows how Hawks would re-use(consciously? or sub-consciously?) similar dialogue and scenes


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0FXpfYQPSGY

reply

"The Howard Hawks Woman" video has been reposted on veoh:

http://www.veoh.com/watch/v1233306rektDx48?h1=Howard+Hawks+Heroines

reply

i just saw this movie a day after rio bravo - about 2 scenes were word for word, and each of them was still awesome and different

reply