There are just a couple of things that bug me about this film.
One is Fred Murrys narration. While it is pretty noir, like ultimate definitive noir, it's pretty over the top. Its just so hard boiled. Two is how this whole film is like a lesson in some new gimmick called insurance and how is how it all works and oh by the way we found this loophole no one else knew about where you could get away with murder. It's so crazy. Like, you all have this insurance but you didn't realize you could get away with MURDER!. It's all just so obvious and over done. It feels like the writers thought they discovered this loophole and couldn't wait to make this film. Look what we found!
But man the camera is brilliant in this film. Wilder was a genius with the camera. Stanwyck is super sexy. McMurray is so noir he is like the prototype for every comedy sketch that has ever lampooned noir. That is kind of how this is a definitive noir. I really prefer Out of The Past but the value of this film is still pretty obvious, if less subtle.
...and oh by the way we found this loophole no one else knew about where you could get away with murder.
There isn't any such "loophole" depicted, either in terms of insurance coverage or the plot; it's simply a matter of contriving a murder to look like an accident.
The only difference between this and a hundred other "perfect murder" stories is that the investigative body involved is the insurance carrier rather than - as is usually the case - the police (ever noticed, btw, there's not a single cop in the film?). And there's nothing extraordinary, at the time of the novel, the film or since, about people trying to defraud insurance companies (a point the film itself makes with Mr. Garlopis, the man who torched his truck for the claim money).
it's simply a matter of contriving a murder to look like an accident.
And there's nothing extraordinary, at the time of the novel, the film or since, about people trying to defraud insurance companies
Because no one would get away with anything so obvious from then on. This is so clearly a case of some writers happening upon a plot device that was inventive for the time, but passe from then on. After the industrial revolution the person insurance industry exploded. This film is basically based on "current" events. That's why it is so dated. It was a novelty at the time.
It doesn't seem likely in any event that a murder planned to fit such a specific set of circumstances would be cooked up by anyone else, let alone spawn any sort of "copycats." But something that was "a novelty at the time" sounds more like a recommendation than an indictment.
As it happens, the novel's author, James M. Cain, had already used the idea - without the insurance angle - of a murder staged to look like an accident in his earlier book, "The Postman Always Rings Twice" (filmed two years after Double Indemnity), in which a drifter plots with the young and sexy wife of an older man to get him drunk and push the car he's in over a cliff.
And in the decades since, there's been no shortage of killers who plotted murders that wouldn't look like murders. In '02 for example, a respiratory therapist in Glendale, CA (where I lived at the time) was sentenced for multiple murders committed over a 10-year period by injections of a paralytic drug that caused cardiac arrest in patients. He was nicknamed "The Angel Of Death."
And here's something interesting: in the "Double Indemnity" novella, this is an identity that Phyllis herself has adopted. Several earlier murders when she was a nurse are referred to, and she tells Walter:
"There's something in me that loves Death. I think of myself as Death sometimes. I'm so beautiful then. And sad. And hungry to make the whole world happy, by taking them out where I am, into the night, away from all trouble, all unhappiness."
Fascinating parallel.
Anyway, I doubt people will ever stop trying to dream up ways to commit undetectable murders, by whatever means. Nothing outdated about that.
The only difference between this and a hundred other "perfect murder" stories is that the investigative body involved is the insurance carrier rather than - as is usually the case - the police (ever noticed, btw, there's not a single cop in the film?).
It was accepted as an accident by all the authorites, even Keys initially.
Walters mistake, which I find unbelievable, was not having Phyllis file a claim for the doctors bills for the broken leg.
He was an insurance salesman, that never crossed his mind?
Yeah, that's where Walter tripped up, because it got Keyes' "little man" working.
But a couple points about the "unbelievable" factor: as Walter says in his confession, "I was trying to think with your brains, Keyes, because I wanted all the answers ready for all the questions you were gonna spring as soon as Dietrichson was dead," but he is a salesman, and doesn't possess Keyes' instincts or experience.
When I worked in the insurance business back in the '70s, everybody had their niche, and the sales force didn't worry about the problems of the rating, underwriting, accounting or claims departments any more than we in the accounting department did about any of theirs. If there was anything that didn't ring true for me, it was Walter saying, "In this business, you can't sleep for trying to figure out all the tricks they could pull on you." I never knew anyone in sales who gave things like that the slightest thought; as Keyes says, "they'll write anything just to get it down on the sales sheet."
The other point is that Walter had it, as he tells Phyllis the night the application was signed, "all worked out for a train" before Dietrichson broke his leg. The injury necessitated some late-in-the-day improvisation, to which Walter had apparently not given much thought: "I tried to keep my mind off her and off the whole idea. I kept telling myself that maybe those Fates they say watch over you had gotten together and broken his leg to give me a way out."
And then Phyllis called to tell him the trip was on for that evening, and it was in those final hours that he slipped up.
The story would possibly have been better if they had planned to kill him in some other way for the 50k, but the broken leg and him deciding to take a train to the reunion, brought the opportunity for double indemnity.
"No baby, this changes everything, there is a clause in that policy that allows double indemnity, If he gets killed on the train we can take the company for twice the money"
Needing to hastily change the plan might imply that Walter's mind was too preoccupied to remember to make a claim for the broken leg.