Unlike many others, I didn't pop Bambi into my VCR very often when I was younger. If I remember correctly, my mom didn't even want me to see it for quite some time, because she remembered how much it devastated her when she saw it at 5 years old. I think I finally saw it when I was about 8, and I don't remember it leaving much of an impression on me. I watched it a couple times over the years here and there with other people, and I was usually left with the same general impression: I thought it was a slow movie with very little story where not much happens.
Well, I just watched it again the other day, and wow, it's amazing what a little perspective can do. I no longer see a slow movie with very little story where not much happens; I now see a beautiful piece of animated impressionism that pointedly encapsulates the ebb and flow of life. While there may not be much dialogue, the film is constantly moving - the world and its characters constantly evolving. Where I used to find myself somewhat bored by the various sequences of seasons changing and "nothing happening," I now find myself enraptured not only by the gorgeous animation, but also by the rich symbolic undercurrents that many of the dialogue-free scenes carry. I think that Bambi is a bold example of "pure cinema," in that so many of the ideas and emotions in the film are conveyed purely through imagery and sound. There are so many poetic and thoughtful moments in the film that left me awestruck during my latest viewing, and their cumulative effect was undeniably powerful. Where I used to find the film to be about nothing of consequence, I now find it to be a lean and focused cinematic meditation on the circle of life. Interesting that I had to become an adult before I could truly appreciate an animated Disney film, but even if it took me 24 years, I'm glad it happened.
Anyway, I know I'm probably late to the game on this one, but I just thought I'd share my revelatory excitement with others. What a wonderful little piece of animated art!
"I grew up watching TV and I turned out TV." - Homer Simpson
Actually I'm really glad to hear you say that because I just went through the same experience of awe, wonderment, and emotion as you did. I'm still reeling from the revelatory thrill of seeing it as an adult too. Our stories are slightly different...Bambi was the first movie I ever saw, so I always held it in a special place in my heart. I was only 2 years old when I saw it, I watched it over and over again for years to come, and I even got a huge plush doll of Bambi for my 3rd birthday that I'd bring with me to preschool almost every day. Like you, I hadn't seen the movie in years when I bought the Blu Ray, but I still considered it to be the movie that represented my early childhood at its most innocent.
What you say about the movie's richness, symbolism, and beauty is absolutely true, and it left me completely gobsmacked. I knew I'd love the movie as a nostalgic favorite, but I never remembered it being that artistic, meditative, and lovely. I think what's most incredible is this: As little kids, we probably remember the scenes of the animals as carefree children playing in the forest, because that's what we related to and understood as a kid audience. Now as adults, we get drawn into the scenes representing the passage of time and the changing of seasons. The shifting of responsibility and discovery of romance and challenges in life, because that's what adult life means. In essence, we've grown older right along with the characters.
In any case, even as someone who loved Bambi more than you did as a kid, this was a revelatory experience for me. The story is beautiful, the animation is beautiful, the music is beautiful. It's just amazing to see this movie through new eyes. I'm glad to share your joy.
"The price of originality is going up faster in Hollywood than the price of oil." - Roger Ebert
Thanks for the response, andy! Great to know that the film affected you in a similar way, albeit through a different lens of "Bambi experience." That's so cool that you could love the film so dearly from two entirely different perspectives. I think it speaks highly of the artistic integrity of the film. It's unfortunate how often we return to films we loved as children only to find ourselves shaking our heads in dismay. That you could love Bambi both as a child and as an adult for uniquely different reasons is a pretty neat (and dare I say uncommon) experience.
I also think you hit the nail on the head about how our experience changes. It's amazing how, even though the film never actually changes, we change, and therefore, the film changes with us, because our perception of the film changes. I've had that happen with a couple of films before, and it's always a startling thing to behold. "This is the same film, right? It feels so different now that I'm an adult!" I've found myself thinking that on a number of occasions. I completely agree with your thoughts on our perceptions of Bambi. I think the reason I wasn't that taken by the film when I was younger is because I just wanted more talking animals. That was what I could identify with and relate to, and the film didn't offer enough of that for me at that time. What can I say, I was a needy kid. :-) But as you say, watching it again now, I see the film from a broader perspective, thanks to my broader life experience. And heck, I'm only a young adult at this point in time, so I still have a lot of experience to gain. Who knows how much more my perspective will change? If I love the film this much now, who knows how much more it has to offer as I grow older!
I just purchased the Blu-ray myself, and it's a wonderful release. Gorgeous visuals, rich sound, and a plethora of quality special features (I've already watched them all). The commentary composed of original story meetings is such a neat idea and offers wonderful insight into the creative process. As an amateur filmmaker myself, I'm always yearning to learn from the experience and wisdom of others, and I find those types of extras to be invaluable.
I thought I'd share one particular detail I found to be illustrative of Bambi's streamlined genius. As I mentioned, when I was basking in the glory of watching the film with fresh eyes, I was constantly struck by various details and standalone moments. During that one moment when the two leaves break from the branch and fall to the ground, I was struck by the symbolic gravitas of that image. I not only felt moved by the whole circle of life idea at play, but I actually saw the leaves as an old couple exiting the world together. I can't entirely explain why, as it's never explicitly stated in any way, but the direction of the scene had that guided me in that direction, and it carried with it a powerful emotional resonance. It wasn't until I watched the special features that I realized how brilliantly realized that moment was: that scene was initially intended to be a dialogue scene between two leaves as an old couple exiting the world together! I couldn't believe it when I saw that. Ultimately, I found the deleted dialogue to be distracting and unnecessary, and the image of the leaves falling for ten seconds was able to give the exact same impression that the dialogue gave in two minutes. The image encapsulated it all for me. I found it truly impressive that images and music alone were able to communicate the very idea that they initially wrote into the scene. Now THAT is powerful filmmaking.
And that's just one example of countless bits of cinematic poetry that can be found in this film. I look forward to watching it more in the near future, as I've only had the chance to watch it once since I bought the Blu-ray. I'm even about to do something I've never done before: watch a Disney sequel. The trailer for Bambi 2 on the Bambi Blu-ray actually peaked my interest due to the fact that it fills in that huge ellipsis after Bambi's mother dies. It seems like an interesting approach to complement the original film. I don't have high expectations for it, but I'm curious to see it nonetheless.
Thanks again for sharing your story with me, andy. I'm glad to know that we've shared a similar experience in our recent viewings of Bambi. :-)
"I grew up watching TV and I turned out TV." - Homer Simpson
One note about that sequence of the falling leaves: I agree that the dialogue between the leaves would not have worked in the context of the final film and that the short, silent version gets that exact emotion and image across. But I think you have to admit that on its own, it is a very beautiful, haunting, and touching exchange. It really does sound surprisingly genuine. Apparently the dialogue between the leaves was actually from the original Felix Salten novel, and the scene in the film was a visual homage to it. The dialogue wouldn't have worked in the movie, but it probably could in its own context, maybe as a short film.
And as you say, I'm now fascinated to wonder what the film will "change" into 20 years from now, when I'm a middle-aged parent, perhaps watching it with my children. I'll have come full circle just as the characters do at the end. I found myself getting very choked up at the final scene of the film. Nostalgia, or maybe awareness that that's where I'd be heading some day?
"The price of originality is going up faster in Hollywood than the price of oil." - Roger Ebert
Oh, definitely. It's a beautiful scene on its own, and especially bold in an animated children's film. However, in the context of the film as a whole, I personally think it would have come off as a little too on the nose, seeing as everything else is largely left abstract and impressionistic by comparison. That being said, taken as a standalone scene, it's quite lovely. In the special features, it sounds like Disney really wanted the scene to be in the film, but ultimately, it distracted too much from the central story, so as you said, he just left the leaves as an homage in the final film. I was just so impressed by how concisely that homage conveyed the same idea. Great stuff!
"I grew up watching TV and I turned out TV." - Homer Simpson
>>>Apparently the dialogue between the leaves was actually from the original Felix Salten novel
From what I recall, the conversation between the leaves is an entire (very short) chapter in the book. I always felt that it was one of the most poetic conceits of a book that is full of poetic melancholy.
The one downside to the film, I'm afraid, is that in some parts of the world the Salten novel has now become impossible to get, because Disney have the rights and don't choose to have the original version available. As a result I stockpiled second-hand copies a few years ago, in the event of my wanting to lend a copy to anybody in the future.
(It was the first full-length book I ever read, hence my obsession)
>>>I'm even about to do something I've never done before: watch a Disney sequel. The trailer for Bambi 2 on the Bambi Blu-ray actually peaked my interest due to the fact that it fills in that huge ellipsis after Bambi's mother dies. It seems like an interesting approach to complement the original film. I don't have high expectations for it, but I'm curious to see it nonetheless.
I felt much the same way (I went to see the sequel in the cinema), and was agreeably surprised, because this one was made with care, and isn't the usual cash-in-on-a-hit, sub-par made-for-video Disney sequel. It's short (barely over an hour), and while the animation isn't quite at the level of the original, it is in that style. As you've mentioned, it fills in the gap in the original and thus seems very much of a piece with it. I'd recommend it, from one 'Bambi' fan (both of the book and the film) to another.
P.S. And as combat pointed out, the dialogue between the autumn leaves is indeed one full chapter in the book and is the transition between the end of autumn and the beginning of winter.
combat and ffeff, fancy meeting you two here! I was pleasantly surprised to find responses from you upon checking out the thread again. I hope life is finding you both well.
It sounds like I should definitely check out the novel at some point (albeit in what will probably end up being a bastardized version it sounds like). Bambi is probably one of the many examples of how literature and cinema are two very different artistic mediums. The scene between the two leaves is indeed a great scene, and I could see it being wonderful to behold in its proper context. While I don't really feel it would've fit in the context of the film, I'm sure it is beautifully realized in the novel. As such, I would love to read it in its original form some time, though it sounds like that may be difficult to do based on combat's insights.
As far as the Bambi sequel is concerned, I did end up watching it, and honestly, I was ultimately rather lukewarm about it. I'm very happy that they were indeed respectful to the original by keeping a similar art style and musical accompaniment. Their decision to make a "midquel" was rather inspired, but I felt it was somewhat underutilized. I guess I was (perhaps unfairly) hoping for more of a dramatic coming-of-age story as Bambi struggled with the death of his mother. I kept thinking of The Lion King while I was watching the film, but then again, The Lion King owes a lot to the original Bambi, so maybe it's just that whole creative circle of life thing. :-)
I think what I found most strange was moving straight from the original film, with its elliptical structure and its bold impressionism, right on to the sequel, which is much more of a traditional animated film. I enjoyed it enough for what it was, and to be honest, I don't think I've ever even seen another Disney sequel to compare it to, but I just felt a bit underwhelmed because of that disparity in cinematic approach. That being said, I'm still glad I watched it, and I daresay if I watched it again having not seen Bambi immediately preceding it, I'd probably like it more. Out of curiosity, is any of that stuff from the book? Or does the book have a giant ellipsis like the original film?
P.S. Hey ffeff, this is totally unrelated and O.T. and probably a strange board to mention this on but: Have you seen LMI yet? :-)
"I grew up watching TV and I turned out TV." - Homer Simpson
Glad you didn't think my recommendation was entirely off-base. I went in to the 'Bambi' sequel expecting the worst, frankly (and as good as many Disney features have been, that's how awful the crassly commercial sequels are) so it would have had to be bad indeed for me to be disappointed. Which is another way of saying that perhaps I was overrating it a bit... but I still think that it is a worthy addition to the original story in the sense that it was clearly made to try and match it as far as possible (from what I remember reading at the time, the budget was also fairly small, at least by Disney standards). If you'll give me a few minutes, I'll send you a transcript of the chapter. The book is definitely worth a read, for various reasons.
Last week I finally saw a trailer for 'Let Me In' while at the cinema, so I'm hoping that it might open next week! I can hardly wait... I have of course seen 'Let the Right One In', which I liked and found interesting, so I'm very much looking forward to the remake. I'll let you know as soon as I do!
The leaves were falling from the great oak at the meadow’s edge. They were falling from all the trees. One branch of the oak reached high above the others and stretched far out over the meadow. Two leaves clung to its very tip. “It isn’t the way it used to be,” said one leaf to the other. “No,” the other leaf answered. “So many of us have fallen off tonight we’re almost the only ones left on our branch.” “You never know who’s going to go next,” said the first leaf. “Even when it was warm and the sun shone, a storm or a cloudburst would come sometimes, and many leaves were torn off, though they were still young. You never know who’s going to go next.” “The sun seldom shines now,” sighed the second leaf, “and when it does it gives no warmth. We must have warmth again.” “Can it be true,” said the first leaf, “can it really be true, that others come to take our places when we’re gone and after them still others, and more and more?” “It is really true,” whispered the second leaf. “We can’t even begin to imagine it, it’s beyond our powers.” “It makes me very sad,” added the first leaf. They were silent a while. Then the first leaf said quietly to herself, “Why must we fall…?” The second leaf asked, “What happens to us when we have fallen?” “We sink down…” “What is under us?” The first leaf answered, “I don’t know, some say one thing, some another, but nobody knows.” The second leaf asked, “Do we feel anything, do we know anything about ourselves when we’re down there?” The first leaf answered, “Who knows? Not one of all those down there has ever come back to tell us about it.” They were silent again. Then the first leaf said tenderly to the other, “Don’t worry so much about it, you’re trembling.” “That’s nothing,” the second leaf answered, “I tremble at the least thing now. I don’t feel so sure of my hold as I used to.” “Let’s not talk any more about such things,” said the first leaf. The other replied, “No, we’ll let be. But — what else shall we talk about?” She was silent, but went on after a little while, “Which of us will go first?” “There’s still plenty of time to worry about that,” the other leaf assured her. “Let’s remember how beautiful it was, how wonderful, when the sun came out and shone so warmly that we thought we’d burst with life. Do you remember? And the morning dew, and the mild and splendid nights…” “Now the nights are dreadful,” the second leaf complained, “and there is no end to them.” “We shouldn’t complain,” said the first leaf gently. “We’ve outlived many, many others.” “Have I changed much?” asked the second leaf shyly but determinedly. “Not in the least,” the first leaf assured her. “You only think so because I’ve got to be so yellow and ugly. But it’s different in your case.” “You’re fooling me,” the second leaf said. “No, really,” the first leaf exclaimed eagerly, “believe me, you’re as lovely as the day you were born. Here and there may be a little yellow spot but it’s hardly noticeable and only makes you handsomer, believe me.” “Thanks,” whispered the second leaf, quite touched. “I don’t believe you, not altogether, but I thank you because you’re so kind, you’ve always been so kind to me. I’m just beginning to understand how kind you are.” “Hush,” said the other leaf, and kept silent herself for she was too troubled to talk any more. Then they were both silent. Hours passed. A moist wind blew, cold and hostile, through the tree-tops. “Ah, now,” said the second leaf, “I…” Then her voice broke off. She was torn from her place and spun down. Winter had come.
Oh, and by the way, I stalk combat, which is why we're both here. :)
Wow, thanks for posting that ffeff! That was wonderful to read. I definitely preferred reading it to seeing it played out on-screen. I'm probably not being entirely fair to the deleted scene in the film; if it had been fully animated and performed by professional actors, maybe I would've liked it more. That being said, I still think the scene is probably much more appropriate in the book than it would've been in the final film, which is a very streamlined version of the story. A small detail, but I found it interesting that the the leaves in the book were both female whereas the leaves in the film were made out to be a male/female couple.
Also, I don't know if you saw my question earlier, but I'm curious, was some of the Bambi sequel taken from the book? Since the original Bambi was very pared down, I would imagine that there might not have been a giant ellipsis after the death of Bambi's mother. As such, just wondering if Bambi 2 drew more on the book, or if it was an original story.
And lastly, I remember you saying you stalk combat from the LMI board. He's a good one to stalk, and I was happy to run into both of you here. :-)
P.S. Speaking of LMI, once you finally get a chance to see it, I'd love to hear your thoughts. As such, please feel free to shoot me a private message when the time comes, if you feel so inclined!
"I grew up watching TV and I turned out TV." - Homer Simpson
>>>Wow, thanks for posting that ffeff! That was wonderful to read.
Yeah, she beat me to that - fortunately I read that far before going off to find the text online.
Actually, despite what I said earlier, you likely wouldn't have any trouble finding a copy of Felix Salten's book. I'm pretty sure it's easily available in the US - though utterly out of print in Britain. Mind you, with the internet and Amazon etc, this matters a whole lot less these days of course.
I have to make a confession here, which is that I haven't actually seen Bambi properly, and I went through a phase some years ago of sneering at the idea of it - rather in the manner of certain people prejudicially contemptuous of remakes and adaptations that I now thoroughly despise. At the time, as somebody who loved the book (or at least Whitaker Chambers' 'English Remake' of the Austrian novel) I had serious concerns about the material being handled by Disney. Of course I was being selective in my view of Disney, and slightly alarmed by what I'd seen of the coochy-coo stuff with Thumper and Flower etc etc.
I'm older and wiser, and now planning to get the DVD asap - not least because I saw the new Blue Ray playing in an HMV the other night and was seriously impressed by the movement of the Deer - just the images struck me as having great fidelity to the animals being depicted. Although Salten's novel can be seen as anthropomorphic he's actually very good at using the conceit of talking animals to try and convey a non-human perspective on the world, and so tries very hard to be like a wildlife documentary.
I should warn you, though - if you think that Bambi has harrowing moments, there are moments in the book that are positively apocalyptic. Salten's world is beautiful, full of life, but also full of death and cruelty. In retrospect the sense of persecution and danger in the book is interesting when you realise that Salten was actually Saltzman, an Austrian Jew writing in a time when persecution was far from on the wane for people like himself.
Now, I confess to knowing almost nothing of the Bambi sequel, but perhaps it's worth mentioning that Salten wrote several novels featuring Bambi. There is a direct sequel, 'Bambi's Children', which is far less stark and beautiful than the first novel (written about ten years after) and thus much more suitable for kids - and possibly better for adaptation.
Bambi makes guest appearances in a number of other stories, though. 'Fifteen Rabbits' actually takes place at the same time as Bambi, so the rabbit characters witness some of the events of that novel - such as one of the major deaths of a deer character (mostly implicit in 'Bambi', wildly explicit in 'Fifteen Rabbits'). Fifteen Rabbits is actually at least as harsh and poetic as Bambi, taking an aggressively realistic approach to life for the rabbit characters - which is to say, if you start the year with fifteen baby wild rabbits, how many do you think will be alive in a year's time? Actually, Jaze, it's like that TV series 'Holocaust'. Starts with a wedding, ends with a lone survivor. Well, almost. Either way, Fifteen Rabbits is not a book I'd give to kids in a hurry. Baby Rabbit Death by having eyes stabbed out by crows is something that isn't necessarily obligatory in any childhood.
Anyway, I'm sure I've been selling Salten's books as a huge bundle of laughs. But seriously, I'd advocate anybody giving 'Bambi' a try, because it's criminally under-recognised, and all-too-often forgotten in the shadow of its animated offspring.
>>>if it had been fully animated and performed by professional actors, maybe I would've liked it more. That being said, I still think the scene is probably much more appropriate in the book than it would've been in the final film
Perhaps it would have belonged in a different version of the film? I mean, if they'd approached the tone of it in a different way? I haven't seen it, but it's difficult imagining the leaf scene working in most films, because its a particular conceit that is liable to work better on the page - or if you have strong narrating voice, perhaps.
>>>Also, I don't know if you saw my question earlier, but I'm curious, was some of the Bambi sequel taken from the book?
Hmm. Well, I just looked at the synopsis and it sounds like it was extrapolated from the broad shape of the book's second half. After his mother disappears, the book dwells on Bambi's first winter, his growth to maturity, and so on (including the Gobbo plotline that I won't mention in case it constitutes a spoiler) but the story is mainly about the development of his relationship with the Old Stag. Eventually, Bambi is shot and wounded, and the Old Stag guides him through the woods, shows him how to hide, how to conceal his path, how to lose his pursuer, what herbs to eat... and it's very much the last lesson the father has to teach his son - and it's only at the very end of this sequence that the stag confirms what the readers know; the old stag's last words in the book are something "goodbye my son". The stuff in the Bambi II synopsis about Bambi learning from his father, but also teaching him a few things, seems to stem partly from the relationship in the book, and partly from a hundred billion cheap sitcoms. I love you dad even though I can't always say it, etc etc.
Now, if we want to look at other Disney films that borrow from Bambi, there's always 'The Lion King'... Though that also borrows (inadvertently) from Hamlet, of course.
>>>I remember you saying you stalk combat from the LMI board. He's a good one to stalk
Actually, despite what I said earlier, you likely wouldn't have any trouble finding a copy of Felix Salten's book. I'm pretty sure it's easily available in the US - though utterly out of print in Britain. Mind you, with the internet and Amazon etc, this matters a whole lot less these days of course.
Well, after all this talk, I just might have to go find myself a copy. It's embarrassing how little I read these days, so it'd do me some good to pick up a fine piece of literature for fun again.
I'm older and wiser, and now planning to get the DVD asap - not least because I saw the new Blue Ray playing in an HMV the other night and was seriously impressed by the movement of the Deer - just the images struck me as having great fidelity to the animals being depicted.
The animation truly is quite stunning. I recently purchased the Blu-ray as well, and everything from the impressionistic backgrounds to the jaw-dropping character animation is worthy of frame-by-frame appreciation. While I won't deny that Bambi has cute cuddly animals (indeed, I think it may have been the film to start the trend), don't let that deter you from seeing it, as it really has so much more to offer. I can't comment on how it compares to the book of course, and it sounds like it's most likely a sparsely rendered version of the material (the leaf scene being a case in point), but whatever the case may be, I think it's very much worth checking out on its own terms.
Perhaps it would have belonged in a different version of the film? I mean, if they'd approached the tone of it in a different way?
I think that's definitely a possibility. The film version of Bambi is sparsely written (in dialogue terms), and the filmmakers usually opt for symbolism and impressionism in conveying their ideas rather than dialogue. The dialogue that IS there is relegated solely to the central characters of the film. These are the main reasons why I feel the leaf scene wouldn't have worked in dialogue form. That being said, a different take on the material could very well have resulted in that scene working just fine. However, as you so aptly put, it might invariably be a scene that is better suited to the written word.
Hmm. Well, I just looked at the synopsis and it sounds like it was extrapolated from the broad shape of the book's second half.
Interesting. That's pretty neat that the filmmakers saw fit to draw some more from the book. Yet another sign that, regardless of what one thinks of the final product, it wasn't the usual Disney sequel rush-job. As you mentioned, some of the father/son stuff felt a bit like warmed over leftovers to me, but I can't fault their intentions. It's funny you mention The Lion King, because I had never noticed the antecedent qualities of Bambi until I rewatched it just recently. The whole time I was thinking, "Wow, talk about a precursor to The Lion King!" Then, on the special features, I was happy to find the producer of The Lion King going on and on about how inspired they were by Bambi. I decided to watch Lion King again after that. It was my favorite Disney film growing up, and I still liked it quite a lot. Granted, its inspirations are a bit more obvious to me now (with regards to Hamlet, Bambi, and even the controversial Kimba the White Lion parallels), but I still find the mix of all those elements to be rather inspired and well-realized. It's always nice when we can come back to films we loved growing up and still find them to be of artistic value. After all, nostalgia is a powerful thing, but it can only take you so far.
P.S. Picking up a copy of LMI soon, Combat? I heard it just came out in the UK. I think you even get an extra 20-minute TV special on your disc. You'll have to let me know how it is. As for me, I've already given my Blu-ray copy many a spin in the last few months. The film only continues to reveal new layers and details for me to enjoy. Gotta love it! :-)
"I grew up watching TV and I turned out TV." - Homer Simpson
reply share
>>>I was happy to find the producer of The Lion King going on and on about how inspired they were by Bambi.
I have to say, I had no idea that the connection had been confirmed. I was going out with a girl in 1995 who was basically a massive fan of The Lion King, and when its video release was announced I had to put up with her going on about Hakuna Matata and impersonating Jewish Meerkats and so on. I was a little underwhelmed by the film, but it had things I definitely admired and I've come to appreciate the strong parts of the flm a lot. However, back then I was tutting and saying "Yeah, yeah, this is lifted from Bambi though isn't it?" I then shifted to a more tolerant position on the grounds that The Lion King was explicitly made to be generic, following Joseph Campbell's teachings about the structure of story... many stories are similar without there being deliberate intent. So I'm very interested to discover that Bambi was definitely an influence.
Actually, much good came from The Lion King. Girlfriend introduced me to the music of Hans Zimmer, and I got her to watch the Star Wars films based on James Earl Jones connection. Though I hadn't predicted that she would start to fancy Darth Vader in a disturbing, Freudian way (he reminded her of her dad).
>>>Granted, its inspirations are a bit more obvious to me now (with regards to Hamlet, Bambi, and even the controversial Kimba the White Lion parallels)
No mention of Hugo The Hippo?
In fact, I once sat in a lecture about an Old English narrative called 'Horne Child', which was notable for sharing components with Hamlet, and it was made very clear that the story of Hamlet is just such a fundamental expression of an ancient story that most things end up looking like Hamlet, one way or another. So, sure, The Lion King is very Hamlet - but I always figured that this was because they built the story on broad concepts. At the time I seem to remember them claiming it was the first Disney feature to not be based on an existing story, but built from scratch.
Actually, one of my hobbies is wilfully interpreting things as being a Hamlet variant - or a Fisher King variant, which is especially fun as Hamlet IS a Fisher King variant. Stone's JFK is, frankly, an amazing variation of Hamlet if you have a little bit of imagination - Magic Snake theory, etc etc.
On the special features for the Lion King DVD (which came out in 2003, I think), they have a few brief story featurettes that cover a lot of those things (Joseph Campbell, ancient stories, archetypes, Hamlet, etc.). The way they tell it, The Lion King was indeed created and intended as their first original work. As they shaped the story, they started to see the Hamlet connections and got really excited by them. Ultimately, they decided to embrace them as much as would be appropriate for their story. They said they went back and forth on how far to go. For instance, they even played around with pulling lines right out of Hamlet (such as "Good-night, sweet prince"). Ultimately, they felt that was being a bit too self-conscious and opted not to do that. As the story was developing and they started pitching it to others, it was often pitched as "Bambi and Hamlet with lions in Africa." So it sounds like they were definitely aware of (and embracing) those parallels at an early stage. Assuming their timeline is correct, that is.
Honestly, the special features on the Lion King DVD aren't that great by today's standards (aside from those brief looks at the story which only amount to about 10 minutes of screen time), but it's coming out later this year in a Blu-ray "Diamond" Edition, so I'm very excited to pick that up. The Beauty and the Beast Diamond Edition had a 3.5 hour making of documentary, commentaries, and more, so I hope The Lion King gets the same treatment. I'm very interested to hear more about the development of the project and get further details on specifically where they drew their inspirations.
It's funny you mention "a fundamental expression of an ancient story," because I was really struck by that when I watched Lion King again. I realized that I really like it when fundamental stories are re-dressed, re-purposed, and re-interpreted for a new audience. I think these stories are indeed fundamental (and, dare I say, primal) for a reason. We've been telling them for hundreds of years in every culture, there must be some reason why we continue to tell them, right? Interestingly enough, I've never actually read into this stuff beyond my high school literature course on Joseph Campbell, so I've recently decided that I need to do some more research on the subject, as I find it rather fascinating. If you have any suggestions are good reading material, I'd gladly take some notes from my resident IMDb literary connoisseur.
"I grew up watching TV and I turned out TV." - Homer Simpson
>>>The way they tell it, The Lion King was indeed created and intended as their first original work.
Or at least their first 'generic' work, I guess..! Actually, at the time it prompted an article about Campbell's postulated narrative structure in a Sunday magazine, and they analysed four very different films (including Four Weddings and a Funeral) to demonstrate the validity of this contention.
>>>I think these stories are indeed fundamental (and, dare I say, primal) for a reason.
Certainly. I suspect also that there may be a simple inevitability to the internal engineering of a story that makes certain structures all but unavoidable once certain types of story are set in motion.
>>>I've never actually read into this stuff beyond my high school literature course on Joseph Campbell, so I've recently decided that I need to do some more research on the subject, as I find it rather fascinating. If you have any suggestions are good reading material, I'd gladly take some notes from my resident IMDb literary connoisseur.
Hmm, well, I must confess that while I'm full of observations on this subject, I'm not necessarily well-researched on the theme. I'll look into the matter and get back to you... but at the same time, I think your own common sense is a good place to start. Once you start looking for the inter-relatedness of certain stories, they become increasingly apparent all around us.
For a good recent example, have a look at 'Inception' and try deconstructing the component parts of that story. You can find a certain debt to The Matrix, but also to the things that The Matrix in turn owes a debt to, such as William Gibson's Neuromancer. You can see elements of the Spy genre, and in particular there is a real sense of 'Mission Impossible' to the team pulling a complicated scam on an influential man... which isn't actually so far away from The Sting either. There are deliberate echoes of the stories of journeys into the depths of hell, with the central crisis of Di Caprio's character journeying to the bottom level of the dream world to try and retrieve the shade of his lost love, in true Orpheus style. This is before we even look at other 'Dream' stories, like Dreamscape - or indeed waking-dream stories like 'The Coma' by Alex Garland.
The fact that Inception is such a complicated bundle of influences is interesting, but also a sign of its skill, because it assembles these components with skill, and it comes across not as a lack of imagination but an astute awareness of the family history of the story being told.
Once you start looking for the interconnectedness of stories, it's impossible to stop, I find. And once you do that, it becomes inevitable that you start seeing the same stories in broad outline, repeating in unlikely ways.
For example - much to my surprise, I find that Forrest Gump compares very effectively with the myth of Sir Perceval and The Fisher King. I have no idea how intentional this was, but it's not a vague similarity either. Gump himself is a veritable Sir Perceval, honest and decent and courageous and unprejudiced as much through his simplistic nature as through any learned virtue... and Lieutenant Dan is definitely a Fisher King - the crippled warrior king, who is healed by Gump's fool even though Gump has absolutely no idea that he's doing it... Dan even becomes a fisherman with Gump prior to his catharsis.
Like I say... I have no idea if this is intentional or just an ancient story resurfacing within the culture that has borne it for centuries... but it's definitely fun to speculate.
Oh, and to your other question - in fact, ffeff sent me a Region 1 copy of LMI a little while ago, so there's less pressure on me re last week's R2 release. I thought the extras were the same, but I'll have to double-check... I think I saw the TV special referred to though - it was shown in the middle of the night here in November. Actually it was pretty good as these promos go - some nice interviews. It certainly drummed up my interest sufficiently.
You're most welcome. Sorry I took so long to get back to you, but the truth is...
Also, I don't know if you saw my question earlier, but I'm curious, was some of the Bambi sequel taken from the book?
...my memory is rusty, and you inspired me to go on a nostalgia-laden 'Bambi' rampage, so I'll get back to you more fully when I've finished re-reading and re-watching both films.
I remember you saying you stalk combat from the LMI board. He's a good one to stalk
Naturally I stalk combat! Always worth reading and a thorough mental workout.
Speaking of LMI, once you finally get a chance to see it, I'd love to hear your thoughts. As such, please feel free to shoot me a private message when the time comes, if you feel so inclined!
Thank you! I do feel so inclined, and am hoping maybe next week... crossing my fingers! Will let you know as soon as I see it.
>>>my memory is rusty, and you inspired me to go on a nostalgia-laden 'Bambi' rampage
Actually, I was a big fan of 'Bambi Rampage', the notoriously controversial mid-80s comic book series. All rather Unreconstructed and naturally unpopular with feminists for its shameless 'Big Booms & Big Bazooms' philosophy, I can't help but find a certain charm in it nonetheless. I even have a rare copy of issue #17, "And Then All My Clothes Fell Off!!!" It's not actually very good in terms of narrative, but the eight-page 'Bikini SS vs Panzer Pussycats' Tank Battle/Bikini Carwash certainly has to be seen by any lover of fine art.
I've been maintaining for some time that Kristen Stewart should play 'Bambi Rampage' in a movie, especially now that Daryl Hannah is too old. Ideally Natalie Portman would also be cast as Bambi's mentor, Foxy Carnage.
N.B. Some of the above information may not be entirely true, and is instead the work of a crazed genius inclined to telling massive lies at short notice.
Also, there's an additional sense to the word 'romance' for your seriously excellent post explaining the nature of horror, romance and the Gothic... I forget the exact 'LMI' thread.
Always happy to contribute with my earth-shaking insights!
Actually, as you would know if you'd read any Bambi Rampage before presuming to comment, the heroine was modestly proportioned in a ludicrous attempt to pre-emptively assuage critics. It was the ranks of Bambi's enemies that tended to have ludicrously pneumatic figures. Some apologists have claimed that this means that the comic was an attack on body fascism. Critics have disagreed, and Camille Paglia briefly commented on the controversy with the memorable observation that it was "a load o' horsehockey that aint foolin no-one, ya gad-damn hippy".
Personally, after four films playing a sort of moody umber vapour, I think La Stewart would be well-served by a film in which she has to continually emote while waving guns at fascists, communists, nudists, and any other -ists who threaten 1950s morality.
Obviously this whole thing was a satire, but some people take the comics seriously I'm afraid.
I suspect many would have a similar story to yours. I know I do, and if the movie is ever mentioned (particularly with a negative slant), I usually encourage others to watch it again now that they are adults. Actually, that applies to some of the other older Disney movies too, but especially Bambi.