MovieChat Forums > The Letter (1940) Discussion > That Famous Opening Sequence

That Famous Opening Sequence


THE LETTER is one of my favorite films, but one of the disadvantages of modern technology is that it often shatters the myths we’ve been raised on:

The film's famous opening sequence – a long tracking shot beginning with a rubber tree and ending at the Crosby bungalow, where a shot is heard and a man lurches out of the door, followed by Bette Davis pumping bullets into him – has often been praised over the years, and justly so. Davis wrote in MOTHER GODDAM: “This long opening shot in THE LETTER is, in my opinion, the finest opening shot I have ever seen in a film. This was due to the genius, and I used the word advisedly, of William Wyler, our director.”

“I felt this opening shot should shock you,” Wyler later related. “To get the full impact of the revolver being fired, I thought everything should be very quiet at first. I also wanted to show where we were, give a feeling of the dark, humid jungle atmosphere of rubber plantation country. We had a nice set. The day before we started, I laid out the shot. The camera started in the jungle, went on to the natives sleeping, showed the rubber trees and ended on a parrot awakened by the shot and flying away, all in one camera movement that took more than two minutes. This was the first day of shooting and since none of this was really in the script, we would end up with a quarter of a page in the can. You were supposed to do three or four pages a day. On the first day of shooting, I had one quarter of a page...the whole studio was in an uproar, but it became a famous opening scene.”

"...all in one camera movement that took more than two minutes."


Wyler himself apparently encouraged the idea that this scene was one long continuous take, but when the sequence is examined more closely, it becomes obvious that this wasn't quite true. On Warner Home Video’s DVD of THE LETTER, this opening sequence begins 59 seconds into the film – then, at 0:02:05 (two minutes and five seconds into the film) as the camera passes over the thatched roof of the natives’hut, a dissolve joining two separate shots is visible – it’s extremely well-done, and probably went un-noticed by film audiences at the time, and it certainly doesn't take anything away from the brilliance of that opening sequence...9 seconds later – at 0:02:14, that first shot is heard, and immediately we are caught up in Leslie Crosby's web of deceit...


Those of you who think you know everything should politely defer to those of us who actually do!

reply

well... both can still be true. Maybe they DID shoot the sequence in one continuous shot and the dissolve was added later to join two different parts of the shot because the quality if what was in-between was unsalvageable.

You have to remember that most of the movies that are being NOW released on DVD after 60 or even 70 years are painstakingly restored from very old celluloid versions or not much better VHS "masters". I'm not saying that's what happened there but it's possible the dissolve was not part of the original shot.

For every lie I unlearn I learn something new - Ani Difranco

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

Excuse me...

Dodsworth
The Best Years of Our Lives
The Heiress

Do these mean anything to you. Anyway, I love Wyler. Possibly my favorite director. Many of his films are dated, but they still move me more than the films of any other director. It's difficult work to make an audience cry, and Wyler does a good job of it. In my opinion, if a film makes its desired emotional impact, it has succeeded as a work of art. It seems like you don't really go in for films that produce the "sappier" emotions, so maybe that's why we disagree on this. How do you feel about Capra?

reply

[deleted]

I'd like to hear which ones. I just love a sentimental tearjerker to tell you the truth, even while aware that many of them lack serious cinematic value. I'll take gushy World War II propaganda any day, even with the cliches, overblown melodrama and dated stereotypes. Nothing gets to my like Teresa Wright bleading to death during a German bombing raid, or Claudette Colbert defending a team of courageous American nurses from the encroaching Japanese. I'm a relentless fan of both actresses too, but I will admit that what Hitchcock did with Wright in "Shadow of a Doubt" was much better than anything Wyler got out of her. Anyway, I also love the directors you listed. I just happen to love Wyler also. Thanks for being respectful of my opinions even if you don't agree with them. I love Wuthering Heights by the way, but I have trouble keeping a straight face at that cheasy death scene, and since I'm obviously a softy for Korny melodrama, I think that's a telling sign. I still think it has a few up on Cukor's Camille however. That film is visually beautiful, but dramatically it did little for me. Garbo was much better in Grand Hotel and others.

reply

[deleted]

I love all three of the films you list - but especially Dodsworth. What a gem of a film.

"You must be the change you seek in this world."

reply

The Letter is one of my fav movies and probably fav Bette Davis film. That opening sequence is certainly one the best ever, after watching that who can forget how your attention is instantly held as you quickly go from the stillness of the hot night to the cracking sound of a gunshot, or should I say barrage of gunshots!

reply

That beautiful dame could pump bullets into me ANYDAY.

reply

[deleted]