MovieChat Forums > Lost Horizon (1937) Discussion > So aggravating that I stopped watching.....

So aggravating that I stopped watching...


...for a few minutes, was the scene where Wyatt is leading a group of Tibetan children in a refrain of 'Lullaby and Goodnight.' A number of antagonisms about the film had built in me until that moment, when suddenly the class reminded me of the cultural imperialism practiced on native cultures like the Native Americans, the Hawaiians, the Maori, the Aborigines, and many others. I was infuriated, and needed a moment.

I'd already been annoyed by the "ninety white people" that Conway was sent to save, and how he and his party had put their foot in Chinese faces, closing the doors against them more than once. Robert Conway the would-be future Foreign Secretary was really just an old fashioned, racist British Imperialist. I can't imagine what the High Lama and Sondra saw in the man, apparently choosing him for a single utterance in his writings, completely incongruous with his life as a whole. (I much prefer the diplomat Richard Conway from LH '73. Peter Finch's portrayal of the character convinced me that he was the right man for Shangri-La!) But since the High Lama was already engaged in cultural imperialism with the inhabitants of the Valley of the Blue Moon, perhaps Robert Conway was not unsuited after all!

Another thing which struck me as most ill-advised in the context of 1937, was Robert's conversation aboard the plane with his brother George, where he says that, if made Foreign Secretary, he would disarm England. That one, too, made me pause the DVD, considering what we know happened immediately after 1937. Better for England and for the world that Robert Conway departed for Shangri-La!

§« The Sleep of Reason Produces Monsters. »§

reply

It was a different time. It was considered to be "normal" at that time to
glorify white, adult, male Christians. Everyone else was considered to be
"inferior". I was alive then. I remember.


Marge

reply


It was a different time. It was considered to be "normal" at that time to
glorify white, adult, male Christians. Everyone else was considered to be
"inferior". I was alive then. I remember.


Agreed: in order to enjoy this film, you have to be able to suspend your 2009 sensibilities and view it the way someone seeing it in 1937 would. Otherwise, you are not going to enjoy it and there's little point in doing something you won't enjoy.

Things are pretty awful right now, and if people can escape to Shangri-La for a couple of hours by watching this film, there's nothing bad about that: the world is as far away from Shangri-La as it has ever been.

I'm sorry you didn't enjoy it and I hope you were able to find another film that you could wring some pleasure out of.

reply

Didn't you see the part were Bob was talking to his brother about the report they were suppose to send ... he asked if he told them about saving the 90 white people but did you hear the part when he said did you also said that we left 10,000 natives to be slaughtered? He had empathy for them ... and he didn't like the imperialism if you pay attention to what he says when he is drunk ... he didn't care for it at all ... go check out what he said ..

reply

[deleted]

Hmmm....Dragon really has a point.
A Dragon after my own heart!

reply

>>when suddenly the class reminded me of the cultural imperialism practiced on native cultures like the Native Americans, the Hawaiians, the Maori, the Aborigines, and many others. I was infuriated, and needed a moment.
<<


Barrack Hussein Obama is a horrible president

reply

You're a very delicate flower. Your loss.

reply

Agreed.

I'm glad the OP hasn't commented on any of the Mr. Moto films. He'd probably have a stroke.


Conquer your fear, and I promise you, you will conquer death.

reply

[deleted]

Dragon, I just watched the film tonight, and some of your points crossed my mind.

At the opening, where the scrolling book described how Conway had been sent to Baskul to rescue the "white" people, I actively wondered how people would read such wording in the modern apolgise-for-being-white climate. But two things occurred to me: firstly, that the wording was a necessary shorthand, to keep the reading time down -- I guess they could have used a word like "Westerners", but they simply didn't; and secondly, I dothink any culture, anywhere in the world, would have behaved the same way, to evacuate its own nationals, leave the locals to fend for themselves, and not risk a diplomatic incident.



You might very well think that. I couldn't possibly comment.

reply