If there has been a worse movie made before or since this one I have not heard of it. The only good parts are good because they are so laughably bad, like the river scene that goes on forever, I am still watching it a year later, yeah it is that long.
shareI concur. Even at a skimpy 65 minutes this film managed to drag on and on for what seemed like an excruciatingly protracted eternity.
"We're all part Shatner/And part James Dean/Part Warren Oates/And Steven McQueen"
hehe. Yeah the "special effects" of the two men lurking through the river was priceless! ;-)
shareI was interested in the scene with the dancing girl, credited to Sana Rayya. I was wondering if there was any actual choreography… probably not. Most likely, the director had wardrobe dress her up in whatever was available in the studio, they found something Tebitan-like, and she was instructed to improvise.
Smoke me a kipper. I’ll be back for breakfast
this wasn't that bad,, honestly I didn't care for the ring,, 1927 . thought it was utterly boring.
are you going to bark all day little doggie,, or are you going to bite
[deleted]
Yeah it's bad but I have seen worse
shareMovies sucked in general during the 30s because they couldn't really do any action scenes because of primitive technology
share