MovieChat Forums > Modern Times (1936) Discussion > Modern Times is a 'Silent Talkie'

Modern Times is a 'Silent Talkie'


Modern Times was made well after the invention of the talkie. It was Charlo's last "silent" film, and his last as the true Little Tramp.

But anyone who watches it knows it really isn a silent movie. It's a talkie with silence.

I think it's ingenius how he injects the spoken word into Modern Times. He refuses to use dialogue, unless it is dialogue spoken through a machine of some sort (a television, a radio, a record player). He uses song, and incomprehensible speech (e.g. the Tramp's gibberish song).

1. The factory owner speaks when the Tramp is having a cigarette in the men's room. But he's speaking from a television-type screen on the wall, and his voice is somewhat distorted as though an old radio broadcast.

2. The salesmen who bring the automatic feeding machine to the factory owner switch on a record player which speaks the benefits of their machine.

3. The factory owner tells the shirtless motor operator to speed up the assembly line Charlie's working on, again via a television in the wall.

5. Charlie and the preacher's wife are drinking tea in the prison waiting area. Her dog begins to bark audibly.

4. A voice reads a commercial over the radio in the prison waiting area.

5. The four singing waiters in the cafe who perform before Charlie does, as well as clapping and the crowd noise afterward.

6. The jibberish song Charlie sings and dances too at the cafe.

Charlie's reluctance to give into the talkie phenomenon whole-heartedly makes this movie a hybrid, a silent talkie. And the way he only allows dialogue to be spoken through indirect, mechanical means is metaphoric of his disappointment with the technology of modern times, as he knew it.

reply

[deleted]

I never cease to be amazed by the genius of Charlie Chaplin. He was a perfectionist who spent years developing the greatest of his films. And he was driven to make movies that have meaning, social, political, and artistic. They're about universal humanity, they speak the truth. I think that's why so many of his films stand the so called test of time; even in these modern times, when, as you point out stargazer, "we talk to machines instead of each other."



••• "IGNORANCE OF THE LAW EXCUSES NO MAN UNLESS HE IS A JUDGE." ...Edgar Lee Masters •••

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

"City Lights" is also a "silent talkie," and it came out before "Modern Times." Although there is no spoken word in "City Lights" (unlike "Modern Times"), he uses a lot of sound effects, such as the whistle Charlie swallows (he gets hiccups and it keeps whistling.) Also, the important slam of the car door which makes the blind flower girl believe that Charlie is a rich man.

Kat

When was the last time you heard these exact words: You are the sunshine of my life?

reply

Charlie's reluctance to give into the talkie phenomenon whole-heartedly makes this movie a hybrid, a silent talkie.
People may compare this to reluctance to move into color or even the more recent reluctance for directors to embrace the 3-D craze (this fad is far more recent than when your original post was made).

However, while I enjoyed the film, I couldn't stop thinking about how the film was, even by the standards of the day, a relic already years out of date. His fears that the Tramp could not survive in the era of "talkies" was unfounded. Considering his character never "talked" (or rarely) in the silent films, I could have easily have seen Modern Times adopt sound and embrace it fully (instead of partially in just a few scenes), allowing all the characters except Chaplin's to talk.


I'm not comparing the styles or quality here, but the above method method has been pretty successful with Rowan Atkinson's Mr. Bean. While each episode is largely silent, the character of Bean utters perhaps one or two lines an episode (occasionally remaining silent the entire episode).

"You've shown your quality sir. The very highest."

reply