MovieChat Forums > Imitation of Life (1934) Discussion > The notion that this movie is racist sho...

The notion that this movie is racist shows just how sick our society is.


Delilah is presented as a paragon; a great person; the creator of the idea behind a great fortune, who would nevertheless rather be devoted to her best friend than live by herself in luxury. Love and friendship mean more to Delilah than material things.

Delilah's relationship with her daughter is blighted by the conventions of a racist society. "Imitation of Life" is still after so many years a powerful indictment of racism. And it is noteworthy that the actress who played Delilah's daughter was herself a light-skinned black woman who refused to try to pass for white, which she could easily have done. When asked why she didn't pass for white Fredi Washington answered "because I'm honest and because you don't have to be white to be good." You don't have to be white to be bad either.

reply

If you had an idea that made millions of dollars, would you want financial credit for having the idea in the first place? It is nice that she would rather stay friends with Bea Pullman than be rich, but the social cost was was that Bea got all the money, including the percentage of Delilah's and lived at the top while her and her daughter lived meagerly at the bottom using Bea's financial assistance if they needed it. But that just covers money.

Socially, Delilah is made to look like a stereotypical idiot who lives to serve and nothing else. Everything she does is not for her, but for her white boss.

That is what makes the movie racist. What makes it not racist is the friendship between the two ladies and the fact that the film is the first mainstream looks at racism.

reply

My take on Delilah is that she was a wonderful person more interested in doing for others. Her daughter, her employer, etc. She was not a materialistic person. She hob nobbed with the rich & famous via her employer, but her true interest was her church and lodges. She had impeccable character. She was everything a good person is. A generous spirit. What a wonderful world it would be if everyone was that way. Is it racist that Delilah was above it all?

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Late to the game here, but I will offer this - Delilah is a simple and uncomplicated woman. What would she do with all that money? She doesn't want a mansion with servants. She has all she needs right there except her daughter.

It's like if I gave you 100 million dollars. What are you going to do with it? Really. Most people will just waste it.

And some people like to 'do' for others. There's more to many lives than just riches.

I think she should have gotten a bit more in the profits, but then her greedy ass daughter simply would have blown it before or after her Mother passed.

reply

[deleted]

^^^^^This! :)

reply

The movie isn't "racist", but the story is blinded by the author's white privilege.

1) There is no nuance or critique to the race relations. I was stung by Delilah's weary lament that Peola must accept the abuse and mistreatment from simply because she is black, as though it was all the fault and responsibility of black people.

2) Even though Bea and Jessie's backstories were not fully fleshed out, the fact that they are white, speak well, and have manners filled in their "characters" good enough for the plot (and for audiences), whereas Delilah and Peola are simply what they are--a dark-skinned black woman and her white-looking daughter.

3) Black life is completely ignored. I was left dismayed by Delilah's lavish, elaborate funeral. If she was that well known to the black community in New York, and that involved in their society, why in the world was Peola so tormented? There were plenty of black people in upper-class black society who looked like Peola--why didn't she meet those people? Why was so she agonized over attending a "colored college" when colleges like Howard or Fisk were incredibly prestigious HBCUs. And for that matter, Peola was written with no desires but to be white...

4) Passing is simply a plot device exploited for white audiences. Compare the topic in this story to the topic in Nella Larsen's "Passing" and the plot just glosses over what it means to pass, what it means to be white, etc etc in 1930s American society.

I can see why many black writers and such were offended by the book and the movie--it's about black characters created by and for the eyes of white people.

(In parting, it's ironic that blacks are seen as super religious, yet white "Christians" were the ones perpetrating the abuse, bigotry, and racism.)

reply

Very interesting points you bring up. I'd love to know what you think of The Blind Side.

reply

I really enjoyed your comments and analysis, so thanks; your opening sentence seems true of so many properties. Only point 2 wasn't completely clear to me, but I haven't ever seen the whole '34 IMITATION OF LIFE. Is it simply that the characters of Bea and Jessie are more fully formed, while those of Delilah and Peola don't get the background or depth? It almost sounds like you're saying that neither pair is very fleshed out, but perhaps that Euro-heritage audiences would somehow create (mentally, imaginatively) more depth for the one pair than for the other, just because of "race," playing into that 'white-is-default' dynamic that's so pervasive. No--that doesn't sound quite right. Well, I'd welcome a bit more on point 2, and thanks again for your post.

reply

Hi ciocio-2,

I think the issue of race in "Imitation Of Life", most especially the original production, is quite complex. The Fannie Hurst novel was a huge hit in 1933 but a source of tremendous controversy at the time. Hurst, a liberal with a number of African American friends, was taken to task by African American intellectuals for having the Delilah character speak in dialect - Langston Hughes, a friend of Hurst's, went so far as to stage a parody with a white actress playing the Delilah part and speaking in dialect.

In addition, in the novel, Peola does marry a white man, abandons her mother and moves to South America. Joseph Breen, the man who was most responsible for the Production Code, tried to halt production of the film using the anti-miscegenation clause in the Production Code.

Professor Susan Courtney has written about the film. Will Hayes, head of the Production Code, felt the material was too explosive for the screen and Joe Breen ,the man who may have added the miscegnational clause to the Code, tried to stop the movie from being made before the cameras rolled. Per Courtney, "Soon after discussions of the project began in Hollywood, Will Hays voiced his own concern from New York in a single sentence letter to Breen: "Dear Joe: I note your worry about the possible miscegenation angle in the Universal proposed picture The Imitation of Life and know you will watch this carefully." Continuing this tone, letter after letter from Breen, Hays and other members of the PCA is riddled with their "grave…concern" over the script's "very dangerous," "definitely dangerous," "extremely dangerous subject."

reply

It isn't too surprising Langston Hughes, or other black intellectuals, would have a problem with "Imitation of Life". Fannie Hurst seemed to base Delehla on Aunt Jemima; a fictional character made up to sell pancakes and the very embodiment of the black mammy stereotype. Certainly she must of heard of C.J. Walker and other successful black women who were well spoken and certainly not washing the feet of their white business partner or lived in their home on a long term basis. What the didn't have were children who wanted to pass for white even if they could. Far from rejecting her background Walker's daughter was a major figure in the Harlem Renaissance.

In a real sense the the 1959 version was closer to real life. It is hard to imagine the light skinned black daughter of a maid, during the fifties trying to pass for white, at first to be more socially acceptable and, after being beat up by her boy friend who learns about her background, decides she wants to pass full time.

There seems to be a odd arbitrariness to Joe Breen's enforcement of the anti-miscegenation clause. He not only demanded a change in the ending, but also any scene Peola appeared to be involved with a white man. The only scenes Fredi Washington appears in is when her mother catchers her passing for white instead of going to a black college, Peola tells her mother she's leaving and not to acknowlege her presence and when she shows up at her mother funeral. A referencer to a near lynching, Peola had witnessed as a child, was also removed from the script leaving the audience to wonder what was the cause of her self hatred.

In 1937 Universal did their version of "Showboat" based on the Broadway show derived from an Edna Ferber novel. Not only was the character of Julie a light skinned black women passing for white but she was married to a white man. Some how the studio managed to get all of the past the Hays Code. The only major change from the Broadway show was the changing of lyrics "N-words all work on the Mississippi" to a supposedly less offencive (?) "darkies all work on the Mississippi" in one of the songs.

Perhaps it all came down to who was playing the character who was passing for white. Fredi Washington, who played Peola as an adult, was really a light skinned black women. Helen Morgan, who played Julie in "Showboat" was unquestionably white. The casting of white actors as passing characters in major Hollywood films,would continue till the "Cotton Club" was released in 1984.

It is significant that when MGM wanted Lena Horne play Julie, in the 1951 remake of "Showboat" not only did the Breen office object but tried to have the miscegenation theme removed. While that didn't happen Ava Gardner, not Lena Horne, was cast as Julie. The black character, other then Joe singing a sanitized version of "Old Man River" were all but eliminated. It could be MGM only wanted a light musical but it is all but certain Joe Breen had something to do with the dumbing down process.

TAG LINE: True genius is a beautiful thing, but ignorance is ugly to the bone.

reply

Hi andrewwjohnson,

Fannie Hurst had a number of black friends and even made a trip to Canada with Zora Neale Hurston. I'm sure she thought her friendship with black intellectuals would excuse the use of dialect in her novel. It didn't. To be honest, I'm not a fan of the second "Imitation of Life" film so I don't necessarily agree it was closer to real life. Both films are period pieces in my humble opinion.

I've always questioned the veracity of Ms. Horne's claim that she was going to play Julie in the 50s version of "Showboat". She did sing one of the songs from Showboat in a 1940s segment of an MGM musical; however, the Code would have prohibited the studio from using a real woman of color as Julie in the 1950s.

There were a few very provocative plays written in the 1920s and 30s that had miscegenation as a central theme. In nixing the cinematic adaptations of these works, the Hayes office avoided disgruntled audiences reacting to a woman of color in a romantic scene with white actor. I always wondered if Irving Thalberg had played to film the play "Lulabelle" (which was filmed decades later as with Dorothy Lamour as the lead) and cast Nine Mae McKinney when he signed her to a long term contract. We'll never know but it's an interesting thought.

reply

The Second version of "Imitation of Life" was superior to the first only Sarah Jane's character had a back story; something the Hays office didn't allow Peola to have in the original. Beyond that the remake was a soap opera having little to do with the Fanny Hurst novel it was supposedly based on. Most of the plot and even the names of the characters were changed. It shared the Hayes office dictated ending with the original movie but little else.

Whether or not either version of "Imitation of Life" , or most of the other "tragic mulatto" movies reflect the reality of light skinned blacks, in the past when racism was acceptable, is questionable. Far from rejecting ones family the act of passing for white was enabled by relatives. Sometimes an entire family, or at least the parents, would hide their background in order to achieve social and professional success.

"Lost Boundaries" (1949),based on William Lindsey Whites book about Dr. Albert Chandler Johnston who really did pass for white in a small town in New Hampshire,is the only movie I can think of about the subject. True, the family members were played by white actors and some might quibble with how the children react when they learn about their background, all though finding your black after assuming you were white would have really been a jarring experience during the forties, but it remains very good, if little known film.

Anatole Broyard first passed for white when he entered the military, during World War Two, in order to escape the bad treatment and lack of opportunity in the then segregated armed forces. He continued to pass after the war because he feared being pigeon holed as a "Negro" writer and, much later, a black literary critic. His wife and his close friends knew his secret but he didn't let his children in on their background until shortly before his death. Philip Roth, who knew Boyard personally, was inspired to write the "The Human Stain" by his story. Unfortunately his story got into the same tragic mulatto rut with Colman Silks completely rejecting his family and his identity.

Another passing story that would make a good movie is that of Anita Florance Hemmings who entered Vassar in 1893; forty years before the first acknowledged black student was admitted into the well known women's college. She did so with the help of her parents who falsified her birth records. Her roommate became suspicious of her background and had her father hire a detective investigate Ms. Hemmings background and uncovering her background. Since graduation was a few weeks away college administration decided to let her graduate with the rest of her class.

This wasn't the end of Ms. Hemming and passing for white. In 1903 she married Dr. Andrew Jackson Love, a New York City physician who had passed for years, and they continued to live as whites. As seems to be the pattern in these situations they chose to not "burden" there children with the knowledge of their background

Lena Horne appeared as Julie, or to be more exact a actress playing Julie, in "Show Boat", during an opening scene in "When the Clouds Roll By" where Jerome Kern, the subject of the film looks in on the production. While she sings part of "Can't Stop Loving That Man" she doesn't really appear in a scene from the play and she is in too much "light Egyptian" make up to be a passing character. Helen Morgan, who originated the part, never did very little to change her appearance. Oddly, during what is supposed to be tribute to Jerome Kern at the end, Ms. Horne sings "Why Was I Born" in minimum make up.

With all of the speculation, on the Dorothy Lamour discussion board, about possible African American ancestry, "Lulubell" may well have had black women in the title role. That is Wild Speculation of course but, given the treatment and restriction telented people like Fredie Washington, Lena Horne and other light skinned actors went threw, during the thirties and fourties it wouldn't be surprising that those who could would pass as white. Carol Channing talked about passing in her biography. Meyel Oberon kept her East Indian ancestry secret with the help of her mother. Most who decided to move their racial identity to "The Sunny Side of the Street" will never be known.

TAG LINE: True genius is a beautiful thing, but ignorance is ugly to the bone.

reply

Thanks to DigitalDiva and andrewwjohnson for such interesting, informative posts. BTW, I haven't gotten to read Ms. Channing's bio, but thought I read in an interview that she found out much later in life about her African heritage. Am I misremembering?

reply

I haven't read the biography either or anything about when Carol Channing found out about her background on any Internet site. One thing I did find was her obviously black grandmother had sent her father to live with light skinned (white ?) relatives so he would have a chance at life when he grew up. She also minimize her contact with him for the same reason. That would seem to indicate Ms. Channing's parents were not exactly talking about black ancestry at the kitchen table in fact they didn't tell her till she was sixteen.

As I noted, far from the "tragic mulatto" stereotype of children denying their identity and their parents, it was often one or both parents their racial identity from their children. It is not hard to understand why, in the past, those, who had struggled with looking white but being classified as black, would want to protect his or her children from facing the same struggle.

TAG LINE: True genius is a beautiful thing, but ignorance is ugly to the bone.

reply

I don't think this movie is all racist but I thought it ridiculous how Delilah seemed to love her employer more then herself or her family. I don't know any black person who would give up their riches to their employer for something they created. But in those times blacks were portrayed as being very submissive to their boss.

As for Peola, the movie showed how a girl in her position might feel. Fredi Washington who played Peola, fought with the directors and producers over the script, she didn't want to say things like "I want to be white." Fredi said that the movie shouldn't be about someone hating to be black, it should be about someone hating the racist society and being forced to pass.

reply

Let me present this question to you: Would you under any circumstances prefer to serve as a menial in someone's home? Or would you prefer to have a home of your own and design your own life? Of course, any sane person would want to have his own home. Deilah is devoid of normal human wants and desires to make her acceptable to the white audience.

Poor Delilah is concerned only with having an ostentatious funeral. She has left the delights of this world to the white folks. Even a dog will try to escape when he can get the chain from his master's hand. You are fooling no thinking person with your tissue paper agrument that Delilah loves Miss Bea so.

In real life black actress Louise Beavers did a nightclub act with Mae West in the l950s. Word got to Mae that Miss Beavers had a white boyfriend off stage. Mae let her know she didn't like it. Miss Beavers told Mae to "Kiss my big, black ass." Now that's a real, three dimensional person standing up for herself.

reply

@Doug7347


Dude,please-----this movie is outdated as hell and racist---there's nothing remotely progressive about it. It basically just plays up the "mammy" stereotypes that were so popular at the time---given that it was written by a Southern white woman, that's no big surprise. It basically just shows you how racist the world was back then,plain and simple.

reply