MovieChat Forums > Dracula (1931) Discussion > Interesting cast trivia

Interesting cast trivia


Despite the film being a horror classic, it didn't do much good for the creators:

Bela Lugosi enjoyed making the film and playing the character, though he later referred to it as a "blessing and a curse" and disliked the typecasting that occurred after the film. He spent his later years making B-films (at best) and battling drug addiction.

Director Tod Browning did not enjoy making the film, since his original choice for the film, Lon Chaney, had died, and the film was being made on a much lower budget than he wanted. The cast complained about Browning being a hands-off director, and showing no enthusiasm for the project whatsoever.

Dwight Frye (Renfield) was also typecast as crazy loons after the film, and he was not happy about it. His career never recovered, and he died of a heart attack in 1943 at the age of 44.

Helen Chandler (Mina) wanted to play Alice in a film adaptation of Alice in Wonderland and wasn't happy being stuck in a horror picture instead. Her career never got off the ground, and she battled alcoholism only a few years later, and nearly burned to death in a fire 15 years before her death at age 59.

David Manners (John) didn't have it as bad as his co-stars, but he disliked being a Hollywood actor and making Dracula, and in an interview shortly before he died in 1998, claimed to have never seen the finished film.

reply

[deleted]

Maybe Todd Browning wanted Lon Chaney, but it's hard to believe he wasn't happy with Bela Legosi. He was perfect for the role.

reply

[deleted]

With any famous film, there's a lot of trivia that follows it everywhere and Dracula is no exception. While even casual fans are aware of Lugosi's low salary or Lon Chaney's original consideration for the main role, I thought I'd offer a couple of facts involving Bela Lugosi's participation in this movie that are not often talked about:

- Despite the image of Lugosi being indelibly identified with that of The Count, Lugosi is actually wearing a frontal toupee in the film version.

Lugosi was far from balding, but this was presumably a choice by Universal to make the almost 50-year old Lugosi look a little younger. However his conveyance of the character's essence with just his face and eyes is so successful that in most publicity photos taken at the the same time he isn't wearing one and anyone who doesn't know about it can rarely tell the difference.

- There is also a photo of Dracula where you can see Lugosi's temporarily discarded cigar in the far corner:

http://www.pinterest.com/pin/143059725633470358/

- Lugosi's own opinion of the Dracula film was that while he was proud of his own performance, he was not fully satisfied with the end product and as late as the early 50's campaigned for a remake (with himself as star).

- The most common criticism leveled against this film is the liberties it takes with the original book. Lugosi was actually quite aware of the differences between his interpretation and Stoker's original creation, and was always proud not only that his Dracula was his own creation but that his version usurped the original in the public consciousness.

reply