People rave and rave about Chaplin. I watched about half a dozen of his films and they did nothing for me. Left me cold. But I decided to try "City Lights" because it's the one everybody raves about.
NOW I get it!
This was fantastic! He really pulled me in, took me by surprise, had my heart in my throat. And the deliberately ambiguous ending was sheer genius! Leave everybody talking and wondering -- does she still love him? Just pity him? Is she ashamed of him? She's disappointed, but doesn't pretend not to recognize him... there's hope... is there?
Something has to click to "get" Chaplin, but when you do you see a whole new way. The way with great artists. He is so funny and touching. I like the way he is a tramp, and buys the flower from the girl in the beginning, and does not even get his change because the girl thinks it was the rich guy in the car that bought the flower, and then gets a face full of water as a further reward for being nice.
is what is called art! it often takes time, and suddenly everything becomes clear, the artist delivers us his message has its way; and we must adapt to his way of speaking. picasso, chaplin ou rodin... a story, an emotion
People rave and rave about Chaplin. I watched about half a dozen of his films and they did nothing for me. Left me cold. But I decided to try "City Lights" because it's the one everybody raves about.
Which films of Chaplin's are you referring to, Chrissie? If you're talking about the ones he made under Mack Sennett or some of his initial Essany Studios pictures, then it's understandable that most of them wouldn't grab you because those were Chaplin in his formative years as a screen artist, made while he was learning his craft, warts-and-all. But most of his later work, especially the feature length pictures, are universally hailed as silver screen masterpieces.
What's not to like about "Easy Street," "The Kid," "The Pilgrim," and "The Gold Rush?"
Glad you got yourself a treat out of "City Lights," though!
Secret Message, HERE!-->CONGRATULATIONS!!! You've discovered the Secret Message!
I forget which ones I saw, except that he cross-dressed in one and mugged a lot for the camera while he was in drag. Very un-memorable. But "City Lights" blew me away.
I forget which ones I saw, except that he cross-dressed in one and mugged a lot for the camera while he was in drag. Very un-memorable. But "City Lights" blew me away.
Yep! That was DEFINITELY Chaplin, circa 1914-15! Many of his earliest works are as crude and "unmemorable" as all get-out to modern viewers (and the "men-in-drag" shtick was an old staple that, from time immemorial, virutally every comedian has dabbled in, only falling into virtually total dis-use in the last 50 years); however, there are occasional glimpses into the promise he showed as a comedian and artist, and into the greatness that was later to come. One must also bear in mind that Chaplin had little creative control during his earliest days onscreen. The same is true of the great Buster Keaton: neither his nor Chaplin's initial efforts are much to rave about because both men went on to do much better work, later in their careers, when they were free of studio constraints to write, produce and direct their own pictures.
One worthwhile thing in viewing both "early Chaplin" and "early Keaton," though, is to see how both artists began and evolved into the screen icons they would later become.
Secret Message, HERE!-->CONGRATULATIONS!!! You've discovered the Secret Message!
I don't mind the men in drag per se. Arbuckle did it to good effect in Coney Island, Good Night Nurse, and The Butcher Boy. (I think Roscoe made a better looking woman than he did a man!) I also liked Buster's cross dressing in His Wedding Night. That whole scene, where Alice asks him to model the dress, and since he's drunk from the beer Roscoe gave him he starts stripping right in the middle of the room and Alice has to chase him behind the screen. I love that moment.
and the "men-in-drag" shtick was an old staple that, from time immemorial, virutally every comedian has dabbled in, only falling into virtually total dis-use in the last 50 year
Obviously you've not heard of tyler perry? (lucky you!)
I totally, completely agree, although I do *like* Chaplin enough but never really was hooked - until I saw "City Lights". It's the only film of his I come back to again and again.
And yes, I'm a huge fan of Buster Keaton as well -
Please nest your IMDB page, so you respond to the correct person.