MovieChat Forums > Ronan Farrow Discussion > NY Times: Is Ronan Farrow Too Good to Be...

NY Times: Is Ronan Farrow Too Good to Be True?


https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/17/business/media/ronan-farrow.html

Mr. Farrow may now be the most famous investigative reporter in America, a rare celebrity-journalist who followed the opposite path of most in the profession: He began as a boy-wonder talk show host and worked his way downward to the coal face of hard investigative reporting. The child of the actress Mia Farrow and the director Woody Allen, he has delivered stories of stunning and lasting impact, especially his revelations about powerful men who preyed on young women in the worlds of Hollywood, television and politics, which won him a Pulitzer Prize.

Because if you scratch at Mr. Farrow’s reporting in The New Yorker and in his 2019 best seller, “Catch and Kill: Lies, Spies, and a Conspiracy to Protect Predators,” you start to see some shakiness at its foundation. He delivers narratives that are irresistibly cinematic — with unmistakable heroes and villains — and often omits the complicating facts and inconvenient details that may make them less dramatic. At times, he does not always follow the typical journalistic imperatives of corroboration and rigorous disclosure, or he suggests conspiracies that are tantalizing but he cannot prove.


reply

They put him to use. Now they're getting rid of him.

reply

Jews don't get it when others are relevant, successful, both in media.

reply

I have no idea what point you're making with this post. "Jews don't get it when others are relevant..." ---what kind of statement are you making about "the Jews"?

reply

It means what it says. The NYT is not respectful of others in major media. The statement by the Times was arrogant.

reply