What is happening with the Three Of Us?

This message has been deleted by the poster

This message has been deleted by the poster

This message has been deleted by the poster

He should act more? Clearly you've been living under a rock for at least the past year or two. The man is currently the lead actor in a television series. How much more acting does he need to do? Good grief.

Wearing my 'fro as high as it will go

Why do you attack me?

Yes, I am aware of George being a lead actor in Versailles (I'm following his career for a couple of years now so no deifinitely I'm not living under a rock).
But the facts are as following:
a) Versailles is not as successful as it supposed to be (the only winner is Vlahos)
b) George is having a very poor filmography for the actor his age (I think still his most well known and beloved character is Grantaire - so far the first and only time Blagden acted in a high budget Hollywood movie)
c) his movies are either postopned (After The Dark) or never released in theater(Blood Moon) or no one ever seen them (Blight)

I really wish him well and I'm not writing all this to insult him. I think he is a great human beaing and a good actor who deserves more recognition, but he needs to work more and focus more on his acting if he wants to be acknowledged. Versailles is quite dissapointing on this field. I'm not demanding 10 movies per year, but I think one movie (besides a tv show like Versailles) would me nice. Or maybe a role in a tv show other than Versailles.

Oh YAWN...attacking you? Grow up. I merely responded to your comment. Stop being a drama queen and acting like a special little snowflake. UGH...

Secondly, pray tell, how is Versailles not as "successful as it supposed to be"? By what authority do you make such a statement? The show only recently aired its first season for the first time in a few countries (Canada, France etc.) six months ago, it is just NOW airing season one in the UK and hasn't even yet begun airing in the US (which is a huge market) as it will in the coming months. Just because you find it to be "disappointing" doesn't mean sh*t. You don't speak for the masses. And how is the only "winner" Vlahos? I wasn't aware that Versailles TV show was a game with winners and losers.

George Blagden's career is absolutely fine. As one of the former main characters on the mega-successful tv show, Vikings (one who still appears in some scenes), his character Athelstan remains one of the most popular characters, even though George is no longer on the show. Furthermore, Blagden is still a very young man. Stop talking about him as though he's in his late 40's or 50's...the man isn't even out of his twenties yet, for heaven's sakes.

You talk a lot of nonsense and not much else.

Wearing my 'fro as high as it will go

Oh YAWN...attacking you? Grow up. I merely responded to your comment. Stop being a drama queen and acting like a special little snowflake. UGH...
You;re rude lol. And the style of your response suggests who a real drama queen is.

Secondly, pray tell, how is Versailles not as "successful as it supposed to be"? By what authority do you make such a statement? You don't speak for the masses. And how is the only "winner" Vlahos? I wasn't aware that Versailles TV show was a game with winners and losers.

Of course I'm not authority here, but I'm simply basing my opinion on what I'm seeing. And I don't see many Versailles gifsets, edits etc. on tumblr, I don't read many posts about it here as well. As for Vlahos many says he's the only saving grace of the show. Of course it's their opinion not mine (I think both Alex and George and equally great, and Blagden's Louis is an underestimated a masterpiece).

Furthermore, Blagden is still a very young man. Stop talking about him as though he's in his late 40's or 50's...the man isn't even out of his twenties yet, for heaven's sakes.
Of course he's very young and I don't demand from him to have an Oscar. I just want him to have for example Aneurin Bernard type of career (he's only 2 years older than George) - he's curently filming a couple of interesting stuff (and he's not that great as an actor IMHO), while Blagden still focuses on the one TV show for 2-3 years (Vikings, now Versailles). That's my main complain.

You;re rude lol. And the style of your response suggests who a real drama queen is.

So because your fragile little feelings couldn't handle the direct delivery of my reply to your comments you resort to the whole, "you're attacking me..." spiel? Spare me the passive-aggressive drivel. I'm a straight-shooter. If you can't handle that, perhaps you shouldn't be attempting to hold a conversation with the adults.

Next...

Of course I'm not authority here, but I'm simply basing my opinion on what I'm seeing. And I don't see many Versailles gifsets, edits etc. on tumblr, I don't read many posts about it here as well. As for Vlahos many says he's the only saving grace of the show. Of course it's their opinion not mine (I think both Alex and George and equally great, and Blagden's Louis is an underestimated a masterpiece).

If you're silly enough to base the popularity of a television show on how many air-headed fangirls are creating and posting gifs of said television show on tumblr, that HARDLY qualifies as a credible indicator of how successful a show is or isn't.


Of course he's very young and I don't demand from him to have an Oscar. I just want him to have for example Aneurin Bernard type of career (he's only 2 years older than George) - he's curently filming a couple of interesting stuff (and he's not that great as an actor IMHO), while Blagden still focuses on the one TV show for 2-3 years (Vikings, now Versailles). That's my main complain.

Yes, because Hollywood is literally beating Aneurin Bernard's door down, right? Please...the average person hasn't yet even heard tell of Aneurin Bernard. Aneurin Bernard is barely even known outside of the UK and isn't anywhere close to becoming a household name yet.

And that you consider what Aneurin is currently filming to be "interesting stuff" is hardly a measuring stick for how much more "successful" his acting career allegedly is compared to that of George Blagden's.

You're one of those people who thinks simply appearing in Hollywood movies makes one a successful actor, when in fact it doesn't. This isn't the 1980's anymore. Roles on television shows were once frowned upon by actors since television was once seen as a medium for washed-up, has-been actors. Newsflash...in case you missed it, we're now living in the 21st century and in the digital era where along with television, the likes of Netflix, other streaming mediums, the act of binge-watching television shows is all the rage: With the success of many television shows featuring prominent actors, roles in television are highly sought after these days by all types of actors, both A and B list alike, so there goes that argument out of the water.



Wearing my 'fro as high as it will go