One of her main ideas was that humans require using reason in order to live, that force negates your reasoning mind, and therefore it is immoral to initiate force against anyone. Thus, the main purpose of government should be to protect individual rights. How is that fascist or statist in any way?
http://www.forbes.com/sites/harrybinswanger/2013/11/13/statism/
Consider learning directly about the actual ideas held by the target of your smears firsthand rather than relying secondhand on smears made by others.
"Man cannot survive, as animals do, by the guidance of mere percepts. A sensation of hunger will tell him that he needs food (if he has learned to identify it as “hunger”), but it will not tell him how to obtain his food and it will not tell him what food is good for him or poisonous. He cannot provide for his simplest physical needs without a process of thought. He needs a process of thought to discover how to plant and grow his food or how to make weapons for hunting. No percepts and no “instincts” will tell him how to light a fire, how to weave cloth, how to forge tools, how to make a wheel, how to make an airplane, how to perform an appendectomy, how to produce an electric light bulb or an electronic tube or a cyclotron or a box of matches. Yet his life depends on such knowledge—and only a volitional act of his consciousness, a process of thought, can provide it."
http://aynrandlexicon.com/ayn-rand-ideas/the-objectivist-ethics.html
Championing reason is a hardly a recipe for controlling, manipulating, or using force against anyone.
reply
share