What lies or contradictions did you notice in Oprah interview?

🙄YIKES

You watch this nonsense? You really like the media huh? I just got some snippets of it but it's a good distraction from what really matters. I think the continuous take away is she is still Duchess and she is still 8th from the throne and outranks every jealous bitch here.

Yeah, she seems like a bit of a nightmare. I feel bad for the Royals, who actually do a lot of good charity work both at home and abroad, as well as give the English people something to be proud of. Who the hell is Markle to interfere with that? Poor Harry. He seems absolutely whipped.

Congratulations on deciphering her lies. Unfortunately, in the eyes of the media, because she is representing herself as black that makes you a racist and all your points are nothing more than hate speech.

She invoked all the prejudice, didn't she? Racism, mental health, sexism, etc. She knows what crowd she's playing for. Next we'll hear Archie is non-binary, like his father.

They were offered the title that the rules allow, which would be 'child of a duke'. Harry was 'Duke of Sussex', so I believe the title would be Archie, Marquess of Sussex.

They chose 'master archie' instead.

Only when Charles becomes King would he become 'Prince Archie' according to the rules.

I'm sure they know all of this and by not stating this they are creating a false narrative, or letting the audience fill in the gaps with their own imaginations (oh no that's racism!)

Why would someone who hated being a working princess get angry because her kids weren't given titles? She hated the life that came with the title!

I don't think Harry's inheritance from Diana would be enough to cover a lifetime of the kind of security they would need, so I'm not surprised they made deals with Netflix etc. One thing that confused me, however, was that she mentioned before they married that there had been comments from the RF about whether she would be able to keep acting after they married to fund their security because there were concerns in the RF that there wouldn't be enough money for all their security. So then why was it such a big deal to the Royal Family that she wanted to work after they married? If there had been these discussions before marriage about how to pay for security, then how did it come as a surprise to her that paying for security was going to be an issue? Did Harry also not pick up on that problem, with all his experience in the Royal Family? There were a lot of things in the interview that I thought did not make sense.

Also, the issue with Archie not being given security, didn't Eugenie and Beatrice have similar issues? There has been discussion for years about Charles wanting to slim down the monarchy. I always thought that would include Harry and Harry's kids but Harry is in the same position as Andrew, so it does not seem realistic that Harry's kids would get security forever, you know?

I'm not doubting security was a problem but it all seems a bit vague. Lots of extended Royal Family seem to live in the palace. How do they fund their own security?

I did not like that the incident with Kate and the flower girls was the one thing she chose to elaborate on. Kate is not exactly the powerful person in the room here, as, although wealthy, she's a commoner who most likely ALSO does not have official custody of her own kids. Kate is only protected as long as she follows protocol and pleases the Queen. It came off as very petty to be so specific about Kate and then so vague about who made the racist remarks. It was as if Kate is the one person whose status within the Royal Family is low enough that she can be criticized by name.