Is it me or does he just look like you could snap him, Bane style, over your knee. I don't take him seriously as a leading man. Looks wimpy. I'm probably wimpier but I'm not an actor either.
shareThis message has been deleted by the poster
shareI like Ben the way he is. There's no law that says actors have to have a certain body type. Not all of us are into huge muscles.
shareIf you say so.
He's an actor, not a prizefighter or WWE wrestler. I buy him as a leading man when his performances are great (By the Gun -- in which he was totally convincing as a street thug -- and Killing Bono for example). And to each their own, but if you want to talk leading man good looks, well then hell, he's goddamned gorgeous. *shrug*
He is extremely good looking and NOT a tiny little man. He is tall and although his build is slender he is muscular for his body type. I think he makes a great leading man. Not all women like big muscle bound guys.
shareHe's like 6' tall or taller. I'm dating a guy 6' tall. That isn't tiny.
***
A world of nothingness, blow me away . . .
What the hell? Ben didn't look wimpy even when he had longer hair and no facial hair, so I have no idea what you're talking about. He's always come across as dignified and regal, and if you want to be stereotypical, even more "masculine" in recent years. He's buffed up more and grew out his facial hair.
Leading men don't have to be weightlifters...
WIMPY?!!... Hell I have him in my list of top three candidates for the next James Bond.
BTW, IMDB lists him as 6'1".
I find too much muscle on anyone super gross...
share