My thought is this...Sam (and others) have no control over the features they were born with any more than people have control over their height or hair/eye color. To penalize someone for that, in an industry that that celebrates beauty, seems a bit disingenuous. Second thought is that studios, whether movie or tv, aren't going to waste the big bucks on someone who can't do the job and do it well. All done! 🤔🙂
You're more or less saying that being handsome isn’t a liability. Agree! A person just is. Like having blue, green or brown eyes. Although often it is even considered an advantage, it doesn’t mean per se that this is the person’s only asset, and hasn’t anything else to offer. It’s exactly as you express in your second thought. If he hadn’t anything to offer and couldn’t do his job well, they wouldn’t engage him. As simple as that. :)
reply
share