Wow! Keaton showed himself as a bad looser unable to recognize the merits of others. Redmayne's performance is so subtle and drenching at the same time... so memorable, unique and catching. IMO he was the best BY FAR among all the nominees, if Keaton is unable to recognize this... bad for him. He's just proving he's not leftover of talent to just let his performances speak for himself, he has to attack his colleagues. On the contrary there are actors out there full of talent who actually lost an Oscar undeservedly (like Cate Blanchett who made a once in a lifetime performance in "Elizabeth" in 1998, and lost to the now forgotten performance of Gwyneth Paltrow in "Shakespeare In Love". And Blanchett NEVER SAID A BAD WORD ABOUT PALTROW'S PERFORMANCE. Blanchett's talent spoke for herself and now she has two Oscars for another two roles... and it's just about time she will get a third one).
Keaton now just does not deserve respect about his performances so... I'm going to say what I was thinking all the time (but I was keeping to myself due to respect): I've always considered Keaton a good but forgettable actor, nothing special (and of course nothing above "the lot" of good but humdrum actors)... and he continues with that pattern in "Birdman".
He wasn't terrible in "Birdman"... he just did his part decently, but he was playing himself. ANY ACTOR CAN DO THAT!! I (unlike with Redmayne in "The Theory of Everything") didn't get hooked to Keaton's character in "Birdman" at all.
So don't be so full of yourself Keaton!! you've played also a very ill and troubleled man (actually in terminal stage) in "Desparate Measures" and the performance didn't manage to even catch any attention becuase it was humdrum.
Keaton's lack of class saddens me since I'm such a fan of Tim Burton's films and I absolutely love "Jackie Brown" (not because of Keaton of course, Pam Grier, Robert DeNiro and Samuel L. Jackson overshadow Keaton with their performances).
reply
share