Was he LOOKING for someone to shoot that night?
Well?
share
If he was, he played it brilliantly where it didn't appear so.
No the only people who were blood thirsty were the dudes who tried to kill him.
shareYou have to be stupid and very low-information to believe that he was.
shareThere is no evidence to support that. He didn't walk through indiscriminately shooting people. He only shot three (of many) people who first attacked him. Which also tells us how terminally stupid they were, to attack a man with an AR15.
shareSo by your logic you can walk around aiming your gun at people, and claim self defense when they retaliate? Big brain much ðŸ§
shareHe didn't aim his rifle at anyone that was not a threat. Fact, evidenced by the video. No idiot liberal wishful thinking applies. Sorry the jury didn't tell you what you wanted to hear.
shareno one was a threatening him tardo, you can’t just walk down the street aiming yer gun at people for the lolz since you apparently want to compensate for something. I mean, I guess you can but yer still a POS who also happens to resemble a tranny
shareThat's not what he did and the evidence doesn't support your fictional story. He pointed is rifle and fired at the three people that tried to assault him. One with a pistol in hand. It was justifiable self defense, sorry about your luck.
Funny how the libtards always take up for the wife beaters and pedophiles. Why is that?
There was drone/security footage of him pointing his rifle at people before anyone even approached him.
shareWell, that's the crux of the issue. Only he knows for sure. If the answer is truly yes, there's no way to prove it unless he says so. If the answer is no, there's no way to make everyone believe it. So you just have to come to your own conclusion. Also, it's worth taking into account that most people and many situations are more gray than black and white, and teenagers are not the best decision-makers, and it was a heated situation. I won't even say what my opinion is, just think these are all factors worth noting
shareAs a rule, teenagers are not the best decision makers but in this case, his behavior was textbook perfect. He only shot the three peopel he needed to, hence the jury's decision.
share